The Floofy Moderator
You seem to use "natural" to justify "free" sex and dick pictures, do you not? The latter of which ironically enough, in itself is completely unnatural. Nothing in nature takes photography with electronic man-made devices. However, as I pointed out, the line of thinking surrounding justifying dick pictures being natural cannot hold up to scrutiny.You're argument has some merit, and I agree with most of it. However it's conclusion on hypocrisy does not justify the foundation of your argument of "natural vs. unnatural", all you have done is hint at me being hypocritical, which does not prove or support your argument on naturality.
I do not. As stated, if you want to live naturally you'd move to the barren planes of Africa, live off of the land, and run around as naked as you'd like to be, as nature intended for humanity. But this life wouldn't be ideal nor easy, would it? It's easier to live amongst the civilized populous and the creature comforts and protection that comes with it. But by doing so, you're expected to be modest. So when the people of said civilization calls you out for exposing yourself against their will, their vitriol is to be expected.Let me ask you something; do you believe modesty is natural? You have implication that it wasn't yet also implied your value for it. Do you consider modesty to be natural?