Did you ever go through with it?

I remember reading some internet stories og people who were Zoo exclusive enjoying the thrill of being in stray dogs into their homes for a night session. Though I believe these story are fake, did anyone ever have the thought or even actually did it?
 
Several people here have fucked stray dogs.
The usual course of action is to ask whether they kept the dog or threw the dog back on the street.
If the dog was not kept but just used as a sex toy, those people are promptly scolded for their selfish behavior.
I dare to say a zoo exclusive would have more compassion towards animals to either not fuck a stray or to at least take the dog in, keep it and then maybe have sex wit him/her.
 
Several people here have fucked stray dogs.
The usual course of action is to ask whether they kept the dog or threw the dog back on the street.
If the dog was not kept but just used as a sex toy, those people are promptly scolded for their selfish behavior.
I dare to say a zoo exclusive would have more compassion towards animals to either not fuck a stray or to at least take the dog in, keep it and then maybe have sex wit him/her.
I agree with you that is total bs for someone to just pick them up and use them for a toy then just put them back where they found them those are the heartless assholes that shouldnt ever touch a animal its not just crule but beyond fucking wrong. But also I must ask and add to the now would it be wrong for someone to find a stray bring them in do a vet trip get them healthy n look to find them a good home. but if the time a moment comes arise where both want it and it happens would that still be the same thing as if you were to pick them up and drop them back off ?
 
I agree with you that is total bs for someone to just pick them up and use them for a toy then just put them back where they found them those are the heartless assholes that shouldnt ever touch a animal its not just crule but beyond fucking wrong. But also I must ask and add to the now would it be wrong for someone to find a stray bring them in do a vet trip get them healthy n look to find them a good home. but if the time a moment comes arise where both want it and it happens would that still be the same thing as if you were to pick them up and drop them back off ?

I personally wouldn't judge a person for taking in a stray with the intent of rehoming them, but enjoying one another's company in the meantime so long as the usual caveats (i.e. all willing, no harm, no coercion, etc). I perfer it when people are emotionally involved with their partners, but I don't feel that's mandatory to be ethical; one just needs to treat them well and respect them.

Some questions I would ask of someone who said this is what they were doing might be, "How long do you keep a dog?", "What happens when you can't find a home?", "What are you doing to help the dog integrate into a new home?", "What criteria do you use to evaluate the home you're putting a dog into?"
It's not enough to just pick them up and house them if we're not trying to get them into good homes with people who will care for a dog as we might; a poor home where they would be mistreated could be worse than doing nothing at all.

Edit: I've taken in dogs before; when I do they become my responsibility, not just to care for, but to ensure that level of care continues when they leave. I'm an active agent as I expect updates, I expect to hear about problems and am happy to provide behavioral support where needed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
One should never take a animal in and do that I feel kinda of the same as the saying out of the pot and into the fire. Without going into detail which I perfer not to personal reason I currently do this but with a different kind of animal. In which this does come to me from time to time have removed 3 dogs left to die to say, but all 3 where found loving warm homes with owners who love them dearly I check in once a month for the first year and demand updates if anything comes up or a issue arises in which I offer them to return and no questions ask do a screening no different then a job application vet referral the works and also I've been very good at watching people and try to feel out thier personality to be ensure they go to a good home but these 3 were all before my partner and I were fully open about our love of zoo to each other.so nothing ever came from it. I'm still really new to this world to say so many things to learn and understand as for I came from a world of commercial porn this place has shed new light to me and a peaceful world of love and what is not ok so still sorting out of what's truly wrong and what's ok
 
If someone has sex with a stray dog that is intended to be an enjoyable experience for the dog, and his lifestyle means he can use positivity from any available source.
That is very hypothetical, since the usual reason for these threads is "I want to fuck a dog and try what it is like or if I like it." Usually the person's desire for pleasure is first and then there is maybe some concern for the dog.
How often do you see thread saying "I have this stray dog that comes to me every other day who I feed and give shelter to and took to the vet + have sex with." Versus "How can I find a stray to fuck?"

 
There are no ethics covering fucking a stray and turning him out. If you cannot keep a dog, keep it in your pants. THE LAST DAMN THING anyone here needs is a dog thats been taught people are not just a source of a meal, but a source of sex. It doesnt matter that a dog is not capable of rape. If a stray approaches a human, man, woman or child, and displays an obvious need...the dog is going to be dead in 24 hours. If the dog is taken into another home, that might otherwise keep him, or her, it will be the worse for all concerned.

The ethics here is simple....Not your Dog, and not willing for him to BE your dog? Let him alone. Going without sex will not kill you, no matter what your fellow cubscouts told you.
 
Several people here have fucked stray dogs.
The usual course of action is to ask whether they kept the dog or threw the dog back on the street.
If the dog was not kept but just used as a sex toy, those people are promptly scolded for their selfish behavior.
I dare to say a zoo exclusive would have more compassion towards animals to either not fuck a stray or to at least take the dog in, keep it and then maybe have sex wit him/her.

How dare you give that homeless man a Mcmuffin and not let him stay in your home with you forever
 
How dare you give that homeless man a Mcmuffin and not let him stay in your home with you forever

No no, your analogy is flawed; to be comparable to giving a McMuffin to a homeless person would be like giving food to a stray dog. Now if you were inviting random homeless men to pound you in the ass or hoping some homeless woman was desperate/miserable enough for a warm bed for the night to let some random guy fuck her, that would be a better anaology for taking a dog in for sex and turning them back out.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No no, your analogy is flawed; to be comparable to giving a McMuffin to a homeless person would be like giving food to a stray dog. Now if you were inviting random homeless men to pound you in the ass or hoping some homeless woman was desperate/miserable enough for a warm bed for the night to let some random guy fuck her, that would be a better anaology for taking a dog in for sex and turning them back out.

Ah so you're suggesting the dog has human intellect and might be only consenting to sex in hopes it will be adopted? Interesting train of logic
People who apply humans ideas of sex onto animals confuse me
 
Ah so you're suggesting the dog has human intellect and might be only consenting to sex in hopes it will be adopted? Interesting train of logic
People who apply humans ideas of sex onto animals confuse me

Where did you get that from? Dogs don't have ethics, at least not as humans understand them. My point, which you seem to have missed, was that giving food to a homeless human is comparable to giving food to a homeless dog and that having sex with a homeless human is equivalent to sex with a homeless dog. Neither of these is inherently unethical (or ethical) it is the intention that tends to define that. How you could get to that assumption from what I posted, I have no idea.


It doesn't seem like it would remove consent with a dog in the same way it might with a human. Dogs are more vulnerable to not having their signs of consent listened to or understood and tolerating the result (but that's much less likely with a stray). A stray would, without considering anything else, decide if sex felt right for them at that time. A male dog's consent is also way harder to misinterpret.

I want to remind everyone again that I don't want to go out and have sex with strays, despite this being an interesting topic for me to pick apart.

Consent in such a situation is a whole other issue above and beyond the ethics of taking in a homeless stranger (dog, human, chupacabra, or whatever) for the purposes of sex and sending them on their way once you've got what you've wanted.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Where did you get that from? Dogs don't have ethics, at least not as humans understand them. My point, which you seem to have missed, was that giving food to a homeless human is comparable to giving food to a homeless dog and that having sex with a homeless human is equivalent to sex with a homeless dog. Neither of these is inherently unethical (or ethical) it is the intention that tends to define that. How you could get to that assumption from what I posted, I have no idea.




Consent in such a situation is a whole other issue above and beyond the ethics of taking in a homeless stranger (dog, human, chupacabra, or whatever) for the purposes of sex and sending them on their way once you've got what you've wanted.

You're right they don't have ethics. So why are you comparing human sex ethics with how an animal views sex?
 
You're right they don't have ethics. So why are you comparing human sex ethics with how an animal views sex?

I didn't as I clearly stated twice.
Kindly walk me through your train of logic here on how you think what I posted would mean anythig you're claiming it does.
 
This sort of thing would be more location specific like say to a city as I live in the country and I don't think I've ever seen "stray" dogs running around. We have an issue with what we called "dump cats" where people looking to ditch their cats will dump them at farms at night so when you go out you find you have new cats eating with your old cats every now and then and some of the neighbors share cats as they go yard to yard looking for free food.

I look at the stray thing sort of like modern hook up culture in that you go to a bar/club to meet some one to bang and then probably don't see them again. With a dog, its a bit different as they are pack animals by nature and if you show them kindness (bringing them in for food before hand) they are going to look to attach to you (your pack) as a provider. This is obviously different from the next door dog who visits your yard now and then. Now if said stray is part of a group already (street pack) you'd better return them after.

Yes, it's a wonderful tale to hear some guy found a lone mutt in a park, handed her a sandwich and took her home and lived happily ever after. But not all stories have that ending.
 
>stray snuck into my yard to play with my girl
>i play with him instead
>we both cum all over my patio
>he keeps coming back
>he looks for me before my girl
>not my fault he likes cummies
 
No no, your analogy is flawed; to be comparable to giving a McMuffin to a homeless person would be like giving food to a stray dog. Now if you were inviting random homeless men to pound you in the ass or hoping some homeless woman was desperate/miserable enough for a warm bed for the night to let some random guy fuck her, that would be a better anaology for taking a dog in for sex and turning them back out.
I have no idea what a McMuffin is but I do understand what you are saying
You're right they don't have ethics. So why are you comparing human sex ethics with how an animal views sex?
You are turning this into another whole conversation,you might be misinterpreting what ego.. something said
 
I personally wouldn't judge a person for taking in a stray with the intent of rehoming them, but enjoying one another's company in the meantime so long as the usual caveats (i.e. all willing, no harm, no coercion, etc). I perfer it when people are emotionally involved with their partners, but I don't feel that's mandatory to be ethical; one just needs to treat them well and respect them.

Some questions I would ask of someone who said this is what they were doing might be, "How long do you keep a dog?", "What happens when you can't find a home?", "What are you doing to help the dog integrate into a new home?", "What criteria do you use to evaluate the home you're putting a dog into?"
It's not enough to just pick them up and house them if we're not trying to get them into good homes with people who will care for a dog as we might; a poor home where they would be mistreated could be worse than doing nothing at all.

Edit: I've taken in dogs before; when I do they become my responsibility, not just to care for, but to ensure that level of care continues when they leave. I'm an active agent as I expect updates, I expect to hear about problems and am happy to provide behavioral support where needed.
Thank-you for saying all this. That was real important stuff.
 
Back
Top