University of Saskatchewan Zoophilia Study

Status
Not open for further replies.
"To participate, you must ... currently living in Canada or the United States "

Aww, but I like taking part in scientific studies.
 
Did so, that was fun, and it actually seemed like there's some attempt to understand people like us. I liked it.

That first dog btw :gsd_love::gsd_love::gsd_love:
 
Done! It makes me ECSTATIC that more and more research is being done on this sexuality.
 
I'm not entirely certain what they intend to get from the type of questions asked.
To me the inclusion of small and very young animals was a tad disturbing. It's almost as if probing to see how many "animal pedos" or sadists we have among us.

Just my .02
 
Wow. This is the first time I've been offered money! I hope they take my request to donate it to a local animal shelter.
 
Gunslinger1X said:
I'm not entirely certain what they intend to get from the type of questions asked.
To me the inclusion of small and very young animals was a tad disturbing. It's almost as if probing to see how many "animal pedos" or sadists we have among us.

Just my .02
Click to expand...
That's most certainly what they are trying to do. I may be a young whipper-snapper in his mid-20s, but in my 7 year involvement in the zoophile community, I've already ran across several of these sick puppies so far. It's unfortunate, but these people do exist within our the zoo community, if one were to call it a community. I've permanently severed ties with a couple of puppy molesters, animal abusers, and one zoosadist. I do not stand for such crap! But these people are hidden among us, and they do unfortunately exist. Seeing that you are an old timer zoo, I'm sure you're more than well aware of that. I can only imagine how many of those types you've ran into so far?

It might be useful to know just how many, and what percentage of total zoos make up these vile scum-of-the-earth types. (Hopefully, they don't inflate the numbers to make us all look bad.) The amount of "OMG That's HAWT!" comments on abusive porn that's been uploaded to every singe forum that I've been apart of, is frankly disconcerting. But you can most likely chalk them up to being fetishists only interested in the taboo nature of zoophilic sex. They care very little about the well being of the animal in said abusive video.

I for one, welcome these type of questions on the survey. Hopefully, we can get a clearer picture of just how many malevolent zoos exist among us benevolent zoos. That's of course if everyone is to answer honestly.
 
Last edited:
FloofyNewfie said:
That's most certainly what they are trying to do. I may be a young whipper-snapper in his mid-20s, but in my 7 year involvement in the zoophile community, I've already ran across several of these sick puppies so far. It's unfortunate, but these people do exist within our the zoo community, if one were to call it a community. I've permanently severed ties with a couple of puppy molesters, animal abusers, and one zoosadist. I do not stand for such crap! But these people are hidden among us, and they do unfortunately exist. Seeing that you are an old timer zoo, I'm sure you're more than well aware of that. I can only imagine how many of those types you've ran into so far?

It might be useful to know just how many, and what percentage of total zoos make up these vile scum-of-the-earth types. (Hopefully, they don't inflate the numbers to make us all look bad.) The amount of "OMG That's HAWT!" comments on abusive porn that's been uploaded to every singe forum that I've been apart of, is frankly disconcerting. But you can most likely chalk them up to being fetishists only interested in the taboo nature of zoophilic sex. They care very little about the well being of the animal in said abusive video.

I for one, welcome these type of questions on the survey. Hopefully, we can get a clearer picture of just how many malevolent zoos exist among us benevolent zoos. That's of course if everyone is to answer honestly.
Click to expand...
While i agree with your reasons as to why, i have to be suspicious of the overall benefit to us as a whole.
Consider for a moment that the study finds many respondents are overtly, or even subtly attracted to young, or undersized animals, merely because of the way the rating scale was set up. They then publish the results and some overzealous lawmaker takes an interest in us.
Its bad enough the sadists and bumbling idiots give us a bad name, we don't need a study liking us to pedos as well.
 
Just finished mine, not a bad survey. Took about 20 minutes. Worth your time to get more research out there on our community.
 
KnotJacob said:
Also fun how they included questions related to furries and pet play folks, i assume its gonna be a lot harder for normie furs to deny that most like zoo after that study comes out, then again that won’t exactly shine a good light on the community since zoo stuff is frowned upon but we already get called zoos so why not.
Click to expand...
Nope. A study on zoophilia won't give any results about the prevalence of zoos among furries other than that it's not zero. This study can only determine the prevalence of furries among zoos.

If you wanted to know how many furries are zoos, you would have to invite furries instead of zoos to take part.
 
Surveys are great when done properly. Shows the scientific community are hopefully taking Zoo more seriously as a sexuality rather than a kink.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top