Pictures of genitals as an avatar, yay, or nay?

  • Thread starter Deleted member 76481
  • Start date

Should pictures of genitals be allowed as avatars?

  • Yes, I don't see any issue with penises and vulvas as publicly visible avatars

    Votes: 355 47.7%

  • Yes, but only if it features both human and animal

    Votes: 22 3.0%

  • Yes, but only animal genitalia, since this is forum for zoophiles

    Votes: 134 18.0%

  • Yes, but only featured on animated characters

    Votes: 14 1.9%

  • No, photos of genitalia should stay in porn section

    Votes: 220 29.5%
  • Total voters
    745
TheZipper said:
I noticed that no one with genitalia avatars posted an opinion!🤣 (Maybe I missed a few) Also, we never found out how the author of this thread feels about it. @MishaCZ
Click to expand...
I'd preffer if people would keep it for themselves, or in porn section. I just find it distasteful and kinda stupid, honestly. On the other hand, it tells a lot about the person using it, so it may be useful to filter out individuals you don't want to interact with.
 
humananimal said:
A staff member writes as a fact that most members are non-zoos.
So my question was whether he/she really has the numbers, and then how was they acquired.
Click to expand...
most people are into bestiality, but not zoophilia, as in "being in romantic love with an animal".
They're right with that, just take a look at the posts. That's one of the reasons why I don't understand the insistence of so many people that this isn't a porn forum.
 
Sedirae said:
most people are into bestiality, but not zoophilia, as in "being in romantic love with an animal".
They're right with that, just take a look at the posts. That's one of the reasons why I don't understand the insistence of so many people that this isn't a porn forum.
Click to expand...
Well, then we could turn back into the endless discussion about the definition of bestiality and zoophilia. It is like in religions, some people insist on a totally pure conviction, while others (like me) have a more relaxed attitude.
To deny that someone likes zoosex when enjoying to look on a lady being fucked by a dog, is the same as denying that a human likes sex when enjoying to look on human - human sex.
I really don’t think that anybody will deny that.
Conclusion - it is pointless to discus this. It is all the same type.
 
Last edited:
humananimal said:
Well, then we could turn back into the endless discussion about the definition of bestiality and zoophilia. It is like in religions, some people insist on a totally pure conviction, while others (like me) have a more relaxed attitude.
To deny that someone likes zoosex when enjoying to look on a lady being fucked by a dog, is the same as denying that a human likes sex when enjoying to look on human - human sex.
I really don’t think that anybody does that.
Conclusion - it is pointless to discus this. It is all the same type.
Click to expand...

I don't think it is "all the same type". I'm not making judgement, because if everyone is willing and unharmed I don't care, but there is a difference between wanting to watch someone else have sex with a non-human and wanting to do that yourself. There's also a large distinction between the motvations for doing so.
 
egoldstein said:
I don't think it is "all the same type". I'm not making judgement, because if everyone is willing and unharmed I don't care, but there is a difference between wanting to watch someone else have sex with a non-human and wanting to do that yourself. There's also a large distinction between the motvations for doing so.
Click to expand...
It has been debated on an on in many threads both here on ZooVille and on the late BeastForum too.
To me it ends up in the same way as discussing religion and faith. People believes in many different ways, and will not call any one of them wrong.
I don’t want to discuss it, but just stand fast on my sentence, ’it is pointless to discuss this’
 
MishaCZ said:
I'd preffer if people would keep it for themselves, or in porn section. I just find it distasteful and kinda stupid, honestly. On the other hand, it tells a lot about the person using it, so it may be useful to filter out individuals you don't want to interact with.
Click to expand...
Thank you
 
humananimal said:
It has been debated on an on in many threads both here on ZooVille and on the late BeastForum too.
To me it ends up in the same way as discussing religion and faith. People believes in many different ways, and will not call any one of them wrong.
I don’t want to discuss it, but just stand fast on my sentence, ’it is pointless to discuss this’
Click to expand...
yes, fine, I don't care either way. I was just getting involved to explain why the mod said what he did. Or to be clear, to explain what I think they meant.
 
I don’t bother, but maybe it shouldn’t be allowed because it makes this site look like it just a porn site for any new user
 
I'm going with no, not human and not animal. The question meaning closeups I assume. If its a body shot with genitals showing I don't really mind, but just the genitals, no thanks. I'll go watch porn if I'm in the mood for that.

Maybe allow a few custom titles for those that want to put up those profile pics saying "I'm a giant dick/cunt/ass hole/boob"?
 
i dont want to say yes because i dont believe sex has to be pornographized to be respected. if sexually explicit avatars are not helping other peoples sexual persuits then there is no real freedom of speech value. turns out more like fighting words and hate speech.
so i cant say no because people can show what they are willing to respect or make available to others. doesnt matter if its human or animal.

i would say yes though because according to what ive seen, pornography shows a lot of sex people arent really good for. the way they are excluding and misrepresenting other peoples desires to be with animals is not speaking freedom. so the vibes i get from people and their pornography generally is that "this is only about so and so, not about sex or anyone else." cant say that i respect porn avatars when porn itself is speaking conceitedly.

i dont have an issue with people showing their genitals or animals genitals. as long as they are not doing it to tease people for not having it, and not doing it to imply that we should want the human theyre showing us instead of animals.
 
Last edited:
Look at all the comments saying no... Starting to look like the vocal majority IS the total minority 😁
 
Poll should really have an option for "no, but full body nudes should be allowed" cause that feels like the best possible compromise and also I kind of like seeing naked bodies, just not unflattering close-ups of genitalia. And before anyone says it, no, there is no possible way to do a flattering close-up of genitalia in a still image.
 
This is a porn site, not a place to take the high ground and get prudish. Allowing people to choose their own avatars gives others a chance to form a quick judgement of them too, so if you don't like dick pics and someone has one as their avatar, you know they may be best avoided.
 
Because the manifestation of sexuality is a part of the zoo community we have a designated area for titillating materials. Pornography however is far from the entirety of this community and we should separate NSFW stuff for the same reason that Reddit does. Because it allows for access to such materials in the absence of unnecessary pornographic encroachment on non-pornographic discussions.
 
I personally consider that genitalia in avatars are a little bit of bad taste. That kind of things deserve some privacy, and if you want to show yourself that's good too, but that is why a porn section exists, right? :3
 
I see both sides here... I honestly do. My view is... I have found many people here that truly love and respect the animals that they are having sex with. So let me use my avatar for example. I am a Human Animal that loves, adores and loves to have sex with, my Canine Animal lover. I am a truly romantic lover of dogs. This includes having sex with my dog(s). This is what I'm intending to communicate, with my avatar of choice. And please keep in mind that my avatar is truthfully a pic of me and my dog wife, taken just before sharing consensual love making. For me, this is about being honest, in a safe place here at ZooVille.

Thank you for listening
 
first of all, your response is admirable. Thank you for being so respectful.
I consider myself just as you. I truly love and respect the dogs that I've had. up to the point of falling into a severe depression when my first own lover passed away some years ago. It is such the fate of us who love our companions that much.
Don't let other opinions change nothing. I am an open minded person and I dont intend to do such a thing with my comments.
This is just a matter of personal convictions or tastes. I personally don't like seeing genitalia as profile pics for several reasons, but I totally respect that you want to have a picture of such a special, intimate moment with your lover shown to everyone.
Have a nice day!
:)
 
Alpha-Fox said:
first of all, your response is admirable. Thank you for being so respectful.
Click to expand...
It's who I am.
Alpha-Fox said:
I consider myself just as you. I truly love and respect the dogs that I've had. up to the point of falling into a severe depression when my first own lover passed away some years ago. It is such the fate of us who love our companions that much.
Click to expand...
I understand. I recently lost my beautiful lab on Dec 21st. She's the one in my avatar.
Alpha-Fox said:
Don't let other opinions change nothing. I am an open minded person and I dont intend to do such a thing with my comments.
This is just a matter of personal convictions or tastes. I personally don't like seeing genitalia as profile pics for several reasons, but I totally respect that you want to have a picture of such a special, intimate moment with your lover shown to everyone.
Have a nice day!
:)
Click to expand...
Thank you for your open-mindedness. Very appreciated.
 
I'm kinda on the fence about it but I am fine with the explicit avatars, however I do tend to avoid them or just not talk to them as much... but that leaves it to me and as it should remain with me and my decision, I can block/ignore on my own terms
 
Generally no, but there have been some really nice display pictures of animal dicks that have really made my heart skip beats. I'll give my seal of approval to those.
 
For myself I do not see a problem if somebody uses porn/genitalia as public profile picture, also here in this forum I do not mind. Generally Idc really. Sadly I get quite fast putting people in categories when I see their profiles like that. Generally having some prejudices of course but yeah
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top