Pictures of genitals as an avatar, yay, or nay?

[pes]

So my question was whether he/she really has the numbers, and then how was they acquired.

I do not because the forum does not have any way of realistically measuring this number. My estimate is based on years of daily interaction with the forum and the users.
You can see how much it reflects reality from various polls and threads which show how many people are actually zoophiles here and how many are here primarily to find a woman who they can watch having sex with an animal and so on.

 

[MishaCZ]

I noticed that no one with genitalia avatars posted an opinion! (Maybe I missed a few) Also, we never found out how the author of this thread feels about it. @MishaCZ

I'd preffer if people would keep it for themselves, or in porn section. I just find it distasteful and kinda stupid, honestly. On the other hand, it tells a lot about the person using it, so it may be useful to filter out individuals you don't want to interact with.

 

[Sedirae]

A staff member writes as a fact that most members are non-zoos.
So my question was whether he/she really has the numbers, and then how was they acquired.

most people are into bestiality, but not zoophilia, as in "being in romantic love with an animal".
They're right with that, just take a look at the posts. That's one of the reasons why I don't understand the insistence of so many people that this isn't a porn forum.

 

[humananimal]

most people are into bestiality, but not zoophilia, as in "being in romantic love with an animal".
They're right with that, just take a look at the posts. That's one of the reasons why I don't understand the insistence of so many people that this isn't a porn forum.

Well, then we could turn back into the endless discussion about the definition of bestiality and zoophilia. It is like in religions, some people insist on a totally pure conviction, while others (like me) have a more relaxed attitude.
To deny that someone likes zoosex when enjoying to look on a lady being fucked by a dog, is the same as denying that a human likes sex when enjoying to look on human - human sex.
I really don’t think that anybody will deny that.
Conclusion - it is pointless to discus this. It is all the same type.

 

[egoldstein]

Well, then we could turn back into the endless discussion about the definition of bestiality and zoophilia. It is like in religions, some people insist on a totally pure conviction, while others (like me) have a more relaxed attitude.
To deny that someone likes zoosex when enjoying to look on a lady being fucked by a dog, is the same as denying that a human likes sex when enjoying to look on human - human sex.
I really don’t think that anybody does that.
Conclusion - it is pointless to discus this. It is all the same type.

I don't think it is "all the same type". I'm not making judgement, because if everyone is willing and unharmed I don't care, but there is a difference between wanting to watch someone else have sex with a non-human and wanting to do that yourself. There's also a large distinction between the motvations for doing so.

 

[humananimal]

I don't think it is "all the same type". I'm not making judgement, because if everyone is willing and unharmed I don't care, but there is a difference between wanting to watch someone else have sex with a non-human and wanting to do that yourself. There's also a large distinction between the motvations for doing so.

It has been debated on an on in many threads both here on ZooVille and on the late BeastForum too.
To me it ends up in the same way as discussing religion and faith. People believes in many different ways, and will not call any one of them wrong.
I don’t want to discuss it, but just stand fast on my sentence, ’it is pointless to discuss this’

 

[TheZipper]

I'd preffer if people would keep it for themselves, or in porn section. I just find it distasteful and kinda stupid, honestly. On the other hand, it tells a lot about the person using it, so it may be useful to filter out individuals you don't want to interact with.

Thank you

 

[Sedirae]

It has been debated on an on in many threads both here on ZooVille and on the late BeastForum too.
To me it ends up in the same way as discussing religion and faith. People believes in many different ways, and will not call any one of them wrong.
I don’t want to discuss it, but just stand fast on my sentence, ’it is pointless to discuss this’

yes, fine, I don't care either way. I was just getting involved to explain why the mod said what he did. Or to be clear, to explain what I think they meant.

 

[Huskow]

I don’t bother, but maybe it shouldn’t be allowed because it makes this site look like it just a porn site for any new user

 

[buttsnake100]

nay

 

[rawcotika]

Hmmm

 

[Steve1982nl]

I'm going with no, not human and not animal. The question meaning closeups I assume. If its a body shot with genitals showing I don't really mind, but just the genitals, no thanks. I'll go watch porn if I'm in the mood for that.

Maybe allow a few custom titles for those that want to put up those profile pics saying "I'm a giant dick/cunt/ass hole/boob"?

 

[K9Curiousgurl]

I'm not really for or against...

 

[francischarneau]

yah

 

[Theunis323]

Nope, I don't think that it's appropriate. It's a turn-off for me...

 

[widget46]

i dont want to say yes because i dont believe sex has to be pornographized to be respected. if sexually explicit avatars are not helping other peoples sexual persuits then there is no real freedom of speech value. turns out more like fighting words and hate speech.
so i cant say no because people can show what they are willing to respect or make available to others. doesnt matter if its human or animal.

i would say yes though because according to what ive seen, pornography shows a lot of sex people arent really good for. the way they are excluding and misrepresenting other peoples desires to be with animals is not speaking freedom. so the vibes i get from people and their pornography generally is that "this is only about so and so, not about sex or anyone else." cant say that i respect porn avatars when porn itself is speaking conceitedly.

i dont have an issue with people showing their genitals or animals genitals. as long as they are not doing it to tease people for not having it, and not doing it to imply that we should want the human theyre showing us instead of animals.

 

[Fun4uuuu]

Personally, I don’t enjoy them as avatars!

 

[gfad69]

Look at all the comments saying no... Starting to look like the vocal majority IS the total minority

 

[RainNyte]

Poll should really have an option for "no, but full body nudes should be allowed" cause that feels like the best possible compromise and also I kind of like seeing naked bodies, just not unflattering close-ups of genitalia. And before anyone says it, no, there is no possible way to do a flattering close-up of genitalia in a still image.

 

[OrangeGirl]

This is a porn site, not a place to take the high ground and get prudish. Allowing people to choose their own avatars gives others a chance to form a quick judgement of them too, so if you don't like dick pics and someone has one as their avatar, you know they may be best avoided.

 

[ninphettadog]

I prefer not