Pictures of genitals as an avatar, yay, or nay?

  • Thread starter Deleted member 76481
  • Start date

Should pictures of genitals be allowed as avatars?

  • Yes, I don't see any issue with penises and vulvas as publicly visible avatars

    Votes: 355 47.7%

  • Yes, but only if it features both human and animal

    Votes: 22 3.0%

  • Yes, but only animal genitalia, since this is forum for zoophiles

    Votes: 134 18.0%

  • Yes, but only featured on animated characters

    Votes: 14 1.9%

  • No, photos of genitalia should stay in porn section

    Votes: 220 29.5%
  • Total voters
    745
I think you should put your dicks on your Facebook profile pictures too. Moreover, your driver's license photos should also be taken of your dick. Even when looking for a job, take a picture of your dick. And print it on your t-shirt too. Amen.

It should be agreed in the middle of the road that regulations are made against human genitalia, but animal genitalia are allowed. This is a zoophile site after all, right?
A perfect compromise.
 
Former I had a cows behind as Avatar.
But now it is a beautiful multicoloured cow. I mean, the avatar must show my interests right ?
EDIT now my T-shirt
 
Last edited:
if it is not prohibited in the forum for me is not a problem although I prefer avatars without genitals
 
UR20Z said:
I find dick-pics and twat-shots as avatars to be EXCELLENT --- indicators of assholes that aren't worth bothering to even speak to, let alone try to form any kind of relationship with. So sure - I say let 'em use 'em. Nothing else does a better job of saying "I'm an uncouth, pathetic, sex-obsessed, desperate, one-dimensional asshole you don't want to have anything to do with - don't waste your time, just put me on ignore" without saying a single word. So I do. (put 'em on ignore when I see they're using a dick-pick or twat-shot as an avatar, I mean)

The example I like to use goes like this: You wouldn't walk into a real-world bar/cocktail party, etc with your dick hanging out of your pants without expecting to get tossed, the cops called, take a beating, or similar negative results, so why would you expect anything different when you do what is essentially the same thing by using a dick-pic/twat-shot as an avatar on a forum?
Click to expand...
Couldn't agree more. A topless photo is meh, wouldnt immediately group that profile with the dick-twat avatar group, more of a "look at me"
UR20Z said:
I find dick-pics and twat-shots as avatars to be EXCELLENT --- indicators of assholes that aren't worth bothering to even speak to, let alone try to form any kind of relationship with. So sure - I say let 'em use 'em. Nothing else does a better job of saying "I'm an uncouth, pathetic, sex-obsessed, desperate, one-dimensional asshole you don't want to have anything to do with - don't waste your time, just put me on ignore" without saying a single word. So I do. (put 'em on ignore when I see they're using a dick-pick or twat-shot as an avatar, I mean)

The example I like to use goes like this: You wouldn't walk into a real-world bar/cocktail party, etc with your dick hanging out of your pants without expecting to get tossed, the cops called, take a beating, or similar negative results, so why would you expect anything different when you do what is essentially the same thing by using a dick-pic/twat-shot as an avatar on a forum?
Click to expand...
I Was about to vote no. But. After reading this reply I decided to vote yes. Because this is perfect
 
Don't really mind it, had one myself for years, it whas not ment to offend people just yeah i really don't know how to explain, maybe trying to share something of us with others.

Either way i think everyone has his own way to expres themselves and i would not be directly judgemental about it, the person behind the picture could be definitely different from what you think they are.
 
I hate genitals as avatars personally, I think they should be banned or a NSFW/SFW avatar switch be put in place so people don't have to stare at it while trying to have a conversation.

Have a little class, put pics in your profile page sure, but not your damn avatar, I can never take you seriously if your cock or boobs are all you think to show yourself as.
When I want to see your dick and or cookie, I'll go to the porn section, porn-art section, or look at your profile.

It definitely pushes away people who would join, if only they weren't bombarded with dick & pussy avatars making it look like a trashy wankfest.

We have a porn section, we are not a porn site.
 
I voted yes, since I don't have a problem with genitals as avatar pictures in general and in this forum in particular.
And there are a few reasons for it.
First reason is, there aren't that many genital pictures used as avatars around anyway, so maybe stop blowing this out of proportion?
Second reason is, this forum is a porn forum. You might want to believe it's all about the community and being together and sharing life, but, well, no. It isn't. There's a large pornsection and that turns this forum into a pornsite. Might not be its intended use or idea, but that's what it is. If you don't want that, get rid of the porn section.
Or lock the porn section behind a paywall or other gate, because that section's also one of the main ways for new people to find this site.
I sure as hell didn't search for "place to talk to likeminded people" when I found zooville and I bet that's true for quite a few others on here.
Third reason is, that the avatars are small pictures on the site of the threads and most who're against it make it sound as if the avatars are front and center in 1920x1080.


But, I also want to say that Valleyyotes argument is incredibly stupid. His whole reasoning is dumb.
 
I don't care as long as nobody is bugging me about not having any. I don't think someone is shallow or uncreative if they have a pic of their boobs/pp/pussy because they may think that particular photo turned out great and who am I to say otherwise. I used to have a dick pic as avatar (not here tho) and it didn't do much to help me (unimpressive pp).
 
I generally don't care, now when someone opens a conversation with their dick as though I should be impressed, THAT is a big turn off that results in that person being ignored.
 
There's no option for "I don't care but probably won't be friends or anything more with someone like that" so I'm casting my vote here. lol
 
I noticed that no one with genitalia avatars posted an opinion!🤣 (Maybe I missed a few) Also, we never found out how the author of this thread feels about it. @MishaCZ
 
humananimal said:
Is that a fact?
And how do you know that most members are non-zoos?
And if so, why are they on ZV at all?
Click to expand...
Makes sense as most comments are about how sexy the women look "with a knot in their cunt" and few about "move away that cunt obstructing the view of a nice hard doggy cock" 🤣

(and none about "I wish I got a glimpse at the dogs pleasure face while at it")
 
Goattobeloved said:
Makes sense as most comments are about how sexy the women look "with a knot in their cunt" and few about "move away that cunt obstructing the view of a nice hard doggy cock" 🤣

(and none about "I wish I got a glimpse at the dogs pleasure face while at it")
Click to expand...
A staff member writes as a fact that most members are non-zoos.
So my question was whether he/she really has the numbers, and then how was they acquired.
 
humananimal said:
So my question was whether he/she really has the numbers, and then how was they acquired.
Click to expand...
I do not because the forum does not have any way of realistically measuring this number. My estimate is based on years of daily interaction with the forum and the users.
You can see how much it reflects reality from various polls and threads which show how many people are actually zoophiles here and how many are here primarily to find a woman who they can watch having sex with an animal and so on.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top