UR20Z
Dumpster Diver
Big cocks OK, dicks, not so muchI am glad I don't have a BIG cock on mine![]()
Big cocks OK, dicks, not so muchI am glad I don't have a BIG cock on mine![]()
Uhhhh, I should do that too. Never actually used the ignore button.I see a dick pic, I hit the ignore button.
Well, I see you have chosen another possibility “hey, look at my cleavage, do you like it?”"Hey, look at my pussy/dick, do you like it, babe?"
Boring and annoying.
Couldn't agree more. A topless photo is meh, wouldnt immediately group that profile with the dick-twat avatar group, more of a "look at me"I find dick-pics and twat-shots as avatars to be EXCELLENT --- indicators of assholes that aren't worth bothering to even speak to, let alone try to form any kind of relationship with. So sure - I say let 'em use 'em. Nothing else does a better job of saying "I'm an uncouth, pathetic, sex-obsessed, desperate, one-dimensional asshole you don't want to have anything to do with - don't waste your time, just put me on ignore" without saying a single word. So I do. (put 'em on ignore when I see they're using a dick-pick or twat-shot as an avatar, I mean)
The example I like to use goes like this: You wouldn't walk into a real-world bar/cocktail party, etc with your dick hanging out of your pants without expecting to get tossed, the cops called, take a beating, or similar negative results, so why would you expect anything different when you do what is essentially the same thing by using a dick-pic/twat-shot as an avatar on a forum?
I Was about to vote no. But. After reading this reply I decided to vote yes. Because this is perfectI find dick-pics and twat-shots as avatars to be EXCELLENT --- indicators of assholes that aren't worth bothering to even speak to, let alone try to form any kind of relationship with. So sure - I say let 'em use 'em. Nothing else does a better job of saying "I'm an uncouth, pathetic, sex-obsessed, desperate, one-dimensional asshole you don't want to have anything to do with - don't waste your time, just put me on ignore" without saying a single word. So I do. (put 'em on ignore when I see they're using a dick-pick or twat-shot as an avatar, I mean)
The example I like to use goes like this: You wouldn't walk into a real-world bar/cocktail party, etc with your dick hanging out of your pants without expecting to get tossed, the cops called, take a beating, or similar negative results, so why would you expect anything different when you do what is essentially the same thing by using a dick-pic/twat-shot as an avatar on a forum?
Do not forget that the majority of the forum consists of non-zoos.Consensus seems to say human nudes as pfp is ok so I guess it's ok.![]()
Is that a fact?Do not forget that the majority of the forum consists of non-zoos.![]()
Makes sense as most comments are about how sexy the women look "with a knot in their cunt" and few about "move away that cunt obstructing the view of a nice hard doggy cock"Is that a fact?
And how do you know that most members are non-zoos?
And if so, why are they on ZV at all?
A staff member writes as a fact that most members are non-zoos.Makes sense as most comments are about how sexy the women look "with a knot in their cunt" and few about "move away that cunt obstructing the view of a nice hard doggy cock"
(and none about "I wish I got a glimpse at the dogs pleasure face while at it")
I do not because the forum does not have any way of realistically measuring this number. My estimate is based on years of daily interaction with the forum and the users.So my question was whether he/she really has the numbers, and then how was they acquired.