140582
Last edited:
M
MrsShemon
Guest
140584
M
MrsShemon
Guest
140586
Surfing USA
Surfing USA
M
MrsShemon
Guest
140588
I am fascinated by my own shortcomings. Got really pissed that a thread is locked because I wanted to correct an extremely polite and friendly user (@knotjen ) for not using ö and ü when writing a band name.
But I still fully understand that her using the 'mericah alphabet is not wrong in any way, shape or form, I still have an erge to do it big enough to actually @ her here.
For information, @knotjen I still think you rock and are an amazing person, even if you skipped the dotts above the letters.
I am fascinated by my own shortcomings. Got really pissed that a thread is locked because I wanted to correct an extremely polite and friendly user (@knotjen ) for not using ö and ü when writing a band name.
But I still fully understand that her using the 'mericah alphabet is not wrong in any way, shape or form, I still have an erge to do it big enough to actually @ her here.
For information, @knotjen I still think you rock and are an amazing person, even if you skipped the dotts above the letters.
M
MrsShemon
Guest
140590
If everybody had an ocean across the USA
Then everybody'd be surfin' like California, yeah
You'd see 'em wearing their baggies, Huarachi sandals too
A bushy, bushy blonde hairdo, surfin' USA
?
If everybody had an ocean across the USA
Then everybody'd be surfin' like California, yeah
You'd see 'em wearing their baggies, Huarachi sandals too
A bushy, bushy blonde hairdo, surfin' USA
Phenix500us
Tourist
141593
Dogstudlover
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
141594
Homersimpson
Tourist
141596
YanchaOkami
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
140598
Hello again, floofs! ?
There was an unnoticed mistake in adding of 1000 to the counter.
@FloofyNewfie : You had edited the posting in which you quoted me, was it not that important?
Doesn't work for me, even less with a toothbrush. ?
But I like the fang clean and sharp. 
Hello again, floofs! ?
There was an unnoticed mistake in adding of 1000 to the counter.
@FloofyNewfie : You had edited the posting in which you quoted me, was it not that important?
Doesn't work for me, even less with a toothbrush. ?
But I like the fang clean and sharp.
YanchaOkami
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
140600
Don't worry, all is fine.
Don't worry, all is fine.
YanchaOkami
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
140602
You do? But it is no problem, my good DaneFloofer - after all 20 pages further to the beginning the counted numbers don't fit the counter anymore, as well, as postings got removed. It's the continuation which counts (and that one is somewhat self-correcting).
You do?
But it is no problem, my good DaneFloofer - after all 20 pages further to the beginning the counted numbers don't fit the counter anymore, as well, as postings got removed. It's the continuation which counts (and that one is somewhat self-correcting).
M
MrsShemon
Guest
140603
It is impörtänt tø nôt mëss üp thê cōûňť. Wę mūšt třÿ þœ be čõrræçt âboút thèm.
It is impörtänt tø nôt mëss üp thê cōûňť. Wę mūšt třÿ þœ be čõrræçt âboút thèm.
YanchaOkami
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
140604
Welcome to the devil! ?
It's quite cold in your country right now from what I've read? Around zero degrees °C?
Here it is rainy. Very extensively rainy. Unfortunate situation as in rain it's physically impossible to work with cement outside.
Welcome to the devil! ?
It's quite cold in your country right now from what I've read? Around zero degrees °C?
Here it is rainy. Very extensively rainy. Unfortunate situation as in rain it's physically impossible to work with cement outside.
140605
I'm going to spell it Mãh-lêê Krøö from now on, just to make MrsShemon's head spin! ??
Nah. I made a post stating that I appreciate all the smut, but also stated that by posting so many at a time it was using up all the newly posted material, which means that the next 69 becomes harder to find smut for, since new smut is often in short supply. But, then I opened up E621/E6AI and realized that the smut you had posted wasn't all brand new. So I'm like, eh, nevermind.
YanchaOkami
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
140606
Ahh, understandable - Yes, it was quite a bit of smut including new ones. ?
Mostly I am offline or busy on the 69-postings, as such it shouldn't limit other users selection of smut that much, hopefully.
But I know the struggle with specific interests, feral female canids with realistic proportions are unfortunately quite limited compared to the total amount. With the AI generation it's at least growing by a few pictures a day.
Ahh, understandable - Yes, it was quite a bit of smut including new ones. ?
Mostly I am offline or busy on the 69-postings, as such it shouldn't limit other users selection of smut that much, hopefully.
But I know the struggle with specific interests, feral female canids with realistic proportions are unfortunately quite limited compared to the total amount. With the AI generation it's at least growing by a few pictures a day.
140607
This would be an otherwise nice piece, but damn does that cookie ruin the whole thing! ?
But yeah, at least AI is making it a bit easier to find new smut, instead of having to post reruns of old smut that's already been posted in this thread 5 or 6 times in the past, when the newer ones dry up.
Indeed, realistic proportions are very rare to come by. There's been many times where a piece looks nice, but then something in them ruins them, like a cookie the size of a pancake.But I know the struggle with specific interests, feral female canids with realistic proportions are unfortunately quite limited compared to the total amount. With the AI generation it's at least growing by a few pictures a day.
This would be an otherwise nice piece, but damn does that cookie ruin the whole thing! ?
But yeah, at least AI is making it a bit easier to find new smut, instead of having to post reruns of old smut that's already been posted in this thread 5 or 6 times in the past, when the newer ones dry up.
YanchaOkami
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
140608
Exactly.. if I see such drawings I have to fight hard not to put a proper ICD-10 diagnostic code and treatment analysis below it. ?
In this case it would be ICD-10 CM-2024 N76.2 or N76.4. ?
Suggestion would be antibiotics, an inflammation-treatment and potentially a surgical removal and labor analysis of any abscess-related growth.
"Taking the whole thing in the mouth" would in this case result in possible secondary infections on the mouth-sided person or at least no improving of the illness. ?
It's probably no allergy as the cause as it is too clearly separated from the non-inflammated area.
Exactly.. if I see such drawings I have to fight hard not to put a proper ICD-10 diagnostic code and treatment analysis below it. ?
In this case it would be ICD-10 CM-2024 N76.2 or N76.4. ?
Suggestion would be antibiotics, an inflammation-treatment and potentially a surgical removal and labor analysis of any abscess-related growth.
"Taking the whole thing in the mouth" would in this case result in possible secondary infections on the mouth-sided person or at least no improving of the illness. ?
It's probably no allergy as the cause as it is too clearly separated from the non-inflammated area.
Last edited:
140609
Indeed, if either of my doggy girls had a cookie that looked like that, I'd be rushing them to the vet ASAP.
It kinda reminds me of that stupid post with the little brown chihuahua looking dog on her back with the cookie the size of a small fist. You can just tell she has some sort of infection going on, the poor thing. But every once in awhile you'll get some ignorant moron that'll post it and say "OmG dis is hawt!" probably not realizing that the dog in the photo is very much in danger and probably in quite a bit of pain.
Indeed, if either of my doggy girls had a cookie that looked like that, I'd be rushing them to the vet ASAP.
It kinda reminds me of that stupid post with the little brown chihuahua looking dog on her back with the cookie the size of a small fist. You can just tell she has some sort of infection going on, the poor thing. But every once in awhile you'll get some ignorant moron that'll post it and say "OmG dis is hawt!" probably not realizing that the dog in the photo is very much in danger and probably in quite a bit of pain.
YanchaOkami
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
140610
Absolutely.. No dog in heat gets a vaginal protrusion of this size without the reasons being either abusive BDSM measures of a mechanical sort or infection- / tumor-related health problems.
If a female dog has an uterine tract infection or one further upwards (kidneys, bladder, uterus itself => pyometra), the cookie can swell up to immense sizes, but it doesn't exactly look "healthy". Same goes for fungi- or bacteria-related issues.
In reality the most loosely visible outer area would be by a big size short fur dog like Great Danes, which were astray for years and had multiple puppies. Then you would've "stretched" tissue, that's normal. But even in this case not looking comparable to what some images present (or ill dogs which people post about.. without even thinking twice how unrealistic it is to have a healthy dog with this swelling size!).
Such strays could look interesting, but most just look "torn". Stressed, abused (even by other strays) and wishing for peace.. without having dangers 24/7 around them, without having to hunt in scrapyards and wastelands or human areas for remains.
With very small dogs (basically wrongly bred goals, as they're rarely healthy - same goes for giant breeds like Giant Alaskan Malamutes) the ratio of their in-heat or aroused cookie to the body can be bigger, that's normal. Same goes for the male dog's phallus size related to their body length. But it surely doesn't take 80% of the backside area. ?
Absolutely.. No dog in heat gets a vaginal protrusion of this size without the reasons being either abusive BDSM measures of a mechanical sort or infection- / tumor-related health problems.
If a female dog has an uterine tract infection or one further upwards (kidneys, bladder, uterus itself => pyometra), the cookie can swell up to immense sizes, but it doesn't exactly look "healthy". Same goes for fungi- or bacteria-related issues.
In reality the most loosely visible outer area would be by a big size short fur dog like Great Danes, which were astray for years and had multiple puppies. Then you would've "stretched" tissue, that's normal. But even in this case not looking comparable to what some images present (or ill dogs which people post about.. without even thinking twice how unrealistic it is to have a healthy dog with this swelling size!).
Such strays could look interesting, but most just look "torn". Stressed, abused (even by other strays) and wishing for peace.. without having dangers 24/7 around them, without having to hunt in scrapyards and wastelands or human areas for remains.
With very small dogs (basically wrongly bred goals, as they're rarely healthy - same goes for giant breeds like Giant Alaskan Malamutes) the ratio of their in-heat or aroused cookie to the body can be bigger, that's normal. Same goes for the male dog's phallus size related to their body length. But it surely doesn't take 80% of the backside area. ?
140612