• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

Count to ∞!

117696

Oh yeah, they definitely know I love them, and I know they love me. There's no doubt about it, but still... I'd love to be able to express that in words with them. We're social creatures after all. Spoken language about the only thing our relationship is missing... that, and a lifespan to match mine. Otherwise it would be 100% perfect in my opinion.

71be87453649e2b3b43dbb85e55f96b2.gif
 
1176 Windows 98 SE (Smut Edition)

No reaction for that last one... I see how it is!

They understand some words/phrases/commands of course. And I definitely understand doggy body language as well. But it just isn't the same as being able to have a spoken conversation with them. It's something I'd like to have, but can't. But it is the way it is.

1680340143560.png
 
117700

Nah, I'm just bustin' your chops a bit! Lol

I definitely said this before on the forum. But the reason I don't consider myself zoo exclusive despite only being in a relationship with non-human animals for the fact that they can't have spoken conversations. So for me, the most ideal scenario would be getting into a relationship with a woman that's also a zoo as well. For the zoo side of things I'd have my female doggy gals, while she'd have a doggy boy of her own. I also wouldn't mind a sort of "zoo beard" situation as well, where the relationship is primarily to have someone human to mutually present to friends and family. We could be intimate with each other if we shall choose, and we could be intimate with our respective animal lovers as well. A win-win situation for all of us. But unfortunately such a situation would be a unicorn to actually have since the ratio of dudes to chicks on here is probably around 17:1.

There's still time for your post to get some traction! Nah, it's probably been long buried in a sea of new dick pics and "Wow ur smexy" posts. Lol
 
117701

Yes that is sadly a highly unlikely scenario.
Heck just finding a good non zoo partner as a non zoo is not easy. Where both are non exclusive zoo's and both straight? Very rare for such to happen, but not impossible.
Of the gals here many are in a relationship, many are lesbians and many are zoo exclusive. For the remaining single, straight and non zoo exclusive gals there is a huge competition among the guys wanting a zoo girl, way above the level of any actual dating site.
But a decent fellow that is both smart and funny should have a higher chance than most.


Yepp, that post is long forgotten. Unless some people make real of their threats about making the challenge more visible.
I am both relieved and disappointed that the number is not higher, expected more from how I thought people would think about it.
 
117702

It's definitely not impossible either, just kind of improbable. One of the regular posters on this very thread was kind of sort of in a similar situation for awhile, although ultimately things didn't work out. There's also a lot of barriers to entry like you've mentioned. Of the women users on here, the following would be out of the running...
-Women that are zoo exclusive and not interested in a "beard" relationship.
-Women that just aren't interested in human/human relationships.
-Women that are already in a human/human relationship.
-Women that are strictly lesbian, and not straight nor bisexual.
-Women that find the prospect of men having sex with female animals disgusting.
-Women that are not trustworthy. (As I've seen prior zoos get burned.)
-Women that are non-monogamous when it comes to human/human relationships. (although that's a me requirement.)
-Women that wouldn't be fine with years of chatting before a relationship would even happen.

So, that above leaves very few women on this forum that would be interested in such a situation. But I'm of the mindset that if it happens, it happens. But if not, then not. If not, then I'm more than happy to just continue doing what I'm doing. As pretty much the only things that aren't satisfied by a purely zoophilic relationship is spoken conversations and a lifespan that doesn't come close to matching mine. Otherwise I'm happy to just have what I have now. Unconditional love with my non-human partners, as pretty much every other facet for life/relationship quality is met.
 
Last edited:
117703

That is a good mindset, and the "requirements" are not too high.
I know that I should consider myself extremely lucky to have a partner that might not agree fully, but is sort of supportive and tries to understand me.
The chances of your significant other to accept something like this are slim to none.
I might know of a few that fits that description, and if it is meant to be you will probably stumble upon each other.
Do not start matching people up, Shemon! Bad girl!
 
Double 1 double 7 04 Chevy Aveo

Oops, had to make a couple of tweaks to this list above. Lol.
But yeah, you are definitely lucky to have someone that may not fully understand the appeal, but supports you. I've seen too many zoos on here in human/human relationships that also have a zoo relationship undenounced to their partner blow up in their face once they are found out by their partner. That goes for both women and men really. Although if you aren't honest about it with your partner and one decided to pursue it behind their partner's back it's, in my opinion, a form of cheating.

But I'll sort of play it by ear. You can really never know what life has in store for you, and I definitely don't know what life has in store for me in the future.
 
117708

The "would be like cheating" part I fully agree with. The reason why I took that leap of faith and cried hysterically while trying to be understood in incoherrent words in the first place. Might have been left right there on the spot, but witholding this information felt like I was lying.
Not a way to come clean I would recommend, but I did not know how else to do it. The hysterical crying was not something I planned, it just happened by itself.

You are never seen as someone who interrupts, Fox. Not in my opinion.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top