• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

Count to ∞!

112352

FloofyNewfie said:
Just to make sure I'm not going crazy here, is everyone else still having intermittent loading problems with the forum?
Click to expand...
Not "still", again - yep. Main page (not list in https://www.zoovilleforum.net/forums/-/list , just the main page) is dead again, as well.

It was all fine for several hours, but I guess the attackers aim for the American (mostly) time zones with most visitors. At least a possibility.

Edit: Oh, right now it loaded the main page. Interesting. DDoS data amount seems to vary quite a bit.

MrsDogFantasy said:
There were so few likes in each post on that last page (only one I looked at) so I did not think it would be possible to reach 25, should have said 500 maybe.

But you must agree that it is a little fascinating that one of several DP threads have 139 pages!
Click to expand...
Definitely. It's fascinating that so many men are .. willing to post their dick picture in a Zoophilia and Bestiality forum, which is not exactly contextual, even if "gay / bi male zoo's" search for other humans.. If they search for humans, there are ways easier possibilities with one of the gay / bi / lesbian friendly apps as example. Without risk, as well.

Maybe it's only a "look at what I have!" - concept.

Can't understand this, even being a male human. For me it's important that "it fits and pleases in regards of my animal partners" and that's it - not if cashier 5 out of aisle 3 thinks that my dick looks wonderful. Same goes for if cashier 5 out of aisle 3 thinks my hair needs a cut. Irrelevant. ?‍♂️
 
YanchaOkami said:
Definitely. It's fascinating that so many men are .. willing to post their dick picture in a Zoophilia and Bestiality forum, which is not exactly contextual, even if "gay / bi male zoo's" search for other humans.. If they search for humans, there are ways easier possibilities with one of the gay / bi / lesbian friendly apps as example. Without risk, as well.

Maybe it's only a "look at what I have!" - concept.

Can't understand this, even being a male human. For me it's important that "it fits and pleases in regards of my animal partners" and that's it - not if cashier 5 out of aisle 3 thinks that my dick looks wonderful. Same goes for if cashier 5 out of aisle 3 thinks my hair needs a cut. Irrelevant. ?‍♂️
Click to expand...
I agree. I would never post a pic of my private parts here, or any other public forum for that matter.

But here, where most (?) comes to watch animal-human porn it is really strange to post "look at my dick!" pictures.

Strange, disgusting but still, to me, fascinating that there are so many.

112354
 
112355

FloofyNewfie said:
Hopefully the loading issues should be fixed now... hopefully.
Click to expand...
Definitely better right now. Main page loads as well. (y)
Let's see if this stays for ~24h, then that's a big positive aspect.

MrsDogFantasy said:
Strange, disgusting but still, to me, fascinating that there are so many.
Click to expand...
Yep. Even as the amount doesn't "surprise" me in terms of "how many real zoophiles are on this site - and how many fetishists which basically want to fuck or just masturbate for fun, forbidden areas comparable to kinks but for them more pleasuring, for BDSM concepts, like "let that girl get degraded by JUST a mere dog!"" and such..

You would probably be surprised how many people with such fetishes.. want to "use" the animals as a degrading value for humans that they should (out of the mind of those people) copulate with. As degrading value. While they them self fap off to exactly this. They don't "abuse" animals by enforcing sex to them, if they're clear in mind, but they look at them like those precious animals are a degrading fact.

That's as absurd as it can get. But those people don't grasp the truth, that they are degrading just them self with this behavior and interests, if they can't even give proper care and respect for the animals involved.

Edit: Excuse the rant, it's just my experience out of comparable amounts of years as a Zoophile as our beloved Floofer is old. ?‍♂️ If someone has made different experiences, that's all well and good.
 
Last edited:
112357

I don't find it degrading at all.
Sure there is a domination aspect, but that is also present during sex with my human partner.
He (dog) choses to mate with me, not trying to degrade me or make me feel like filth. It is a special bond we share that is not only physical by any means even if the physical aspect of a relationship is also present.

Like what I have understood that several of the guys here have heard, from members of a site like this. That they are filthy rapists, the F is up with talks like that?
A man who truly loves his partner, regardless of what species his partner is, would not hurt her/him or use her/him for his own pleasure.
Most none psychopatic humans don't hurt or rape their partner, zoo's very much included.

I can rant and become angry too, but I will not excuse my feelings.
 
112368

MrsDogFantasy said:
I don't find it degrading at all.
.. very well written explanation ..

I can rant and become angry too, but I will not excuse my feelings.
Click to expand...

Exactly. It is not degrading at all, but those people imagine it like this to have ("feel") some degrading or dominating aspects in it.

I'm not talking about you, me or the other Zoos which I enjoy communicating with on this site, they're great people that deserve respect.
As well it's not meant to forbid people or belittle them because they themself like to be "sub" or comparable. Absolutely fine.

I should've probably made it more clear: There are quite a lot of users which..
.. if the utmost abstruse and most degrading thing which humans could do based on projected "society norms" was to copulate with a mammoth tree, as example (theoretical concept!) ..

.. they would roam and join any tree forums out here and do exactly the same which happens here in this forum often enough. Search for material or persons to masturbate to or get to meet with. ?‍♂️

This as a theoretical example how they value animals. And that they are merely fetishists without any regards to the animals.

Doesn't make me angry, but it is annoying from time to time.

Edit: Oh, a foxxoooo! *Floofs the fox*
And a Mare Lover, did your work shift end without much hassle?
 
Last edited:
112374

MrsDogFantasy said:
No bashing on dendrophiles @YanchaOkami that is kink shaming ?.
Click to expand...
If people like trees that much - not a problem. The concept I wrote about is basically the opposite of a "phile", tho - that's what annoys me. (y) If someone loves animals, trees, the rainbow.. so be it. That's always corresponding with a quite high value of those loved ones.
 
112378

MrsDogFantasy said:
Have a wonderful late Friday, early Saturday all.
Click to expand...

I wish you the same, have a good and well-resting night! ?
By the way: didn't even respond to the posting about regeneration of forests on a healthy level by fires - I've to say that I fully support the idea, but it's rare to see companies do a lot of effort if it's possible in a cheaper way, unfortunately.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top