Fake User Awareness Thread

We simply do not have the enforcement capability or system advanced enough to detect those. It is up to the end user to be as smart as possible about talking to conplete strangers on ANY website. If someone claims something that is clearly not theirs, we will take action. If something does not seem right, we will allow people to warm others about it.
fair.
 

@Oldman

proof of acting like its "her" photo when it's not.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2022-10-03 at 8.07.48 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2022-10-03 at 8.07.48 PM.png
    116 KB · Views: 37
  • Screen Shot 2022-10-02 at 9.19.37 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2022-10-02 at 9.19.37 PM.png
    920.2 KB · Views: 37

Attachments

  • fake.jpg
    fake.jpg
    43.7 KB · Views: 18
  • Screen Shot 2022-10-04 at 6.46.34 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2022-10-04 at 6.46.34 PM.png
    720.1 KB · Views: 19
  • Screen Shot 2022-10-04 at 6.46.43 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2022-10-04 at 6.46.43 PM.png
    249.1 KB · Views: 19
You have to to better than that. How about researching some of the pics she posted and clearly claimed its her? Those you need to post, not just the avatar.
??? They're clearly all from the exact same gallery/same shoot. Her profile picture is the same as the ones posted around the internet. And she posted other photos from the same shoot. Its all the same.
 
I am not going to go to any of those porn sites. Time is extremely limited and it will not be wasted browsing another porn site when there is a lot to do here.
 
I am not going to go to any of those porn sites. Time is extremely limited and it will not be wasted browsing another porn site when there is a lot to do here.
You dont have to go to any porn sites, all the images are attached. You can clearly see in the attached images it's all the same person, in the same outfit, in the same shoot, and they're claiming to be them.

@FloofyNewfie @ZTHorse am I crazy or are you seeing what I'm seeing??

 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2022-10-04 at 6.46.34 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2022-10-04 at 6.46.34 PM.png
    720.1 KB · Views: 18
  • Screen Shot 2022-10-04 at 6.46.43 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2022-10-04 at 6.46.43 PM.png
    249.1 KB · Views: 18
  • Screen Shot 2022-10-04 at 8.14.32 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2022-10-04 at 8.14.32 PM.png
    393.4 KB · Views: 19
I am not going to go to any of those porn sites. Time is extremely limited and it will not be wasted browsing another porn site when there is a lot to do here.
Would it be possible to enlarge your team with members whom you can trust to distribute the work onto more shoulders? (cc: @ZTHorse)

@noah28's findings appear to be helpful to sieve out people who try to trick others members with lies (even though there is theoretically a tiny chance that a photo that can be found elsewhere on the web does still show the person who registered here).

I also agree with his explanation that using someone else's portrait or other identifiable body part in this forum poses a risk to the person in the photo and is probably a violation of their rights. It would be decent if Zooville would protect these people when the problem is pointed out, even if Zooville can't be held accountable for what a user does with someone else's images.

If that's not possible, then I would suggest to add a disclaimer at the top of the site that urges readers to assume that none of the persons in posted images have any connections to this site and that claims to the contrary should be ignored. For example, 4chan.org/b/ has the disclaimer "The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact." at the top of each page.
 
Would it be possible to enlarge your team with members whom you can trust to distribute the work onto more shoulders? (cc: @ZTHorse)

@noah28's findings appear to be helpful to sieve out people who try to trick others members with lies (even though there is theoretically a tiny chance that a photo that can be found elsewhere on the web does still show the person who registered here).

I also agree with his explanation that using someone else's portrait or other identifiable body part in this forum poses a risk to the person in the photo and is probably a violation of their rights. It would be decent if Zooville would protect these people when the problem is pointed out, even if Zooville can't be held accountable for what a user does with someone else's images.

If that's not possible, then I would suggest to add a disclaimer at the top of the site that urges readers to assume that none of the persons in posted images have any connections to this site and that claims to the contrary should be ignored. For example, 4chan.org/b/ has the disclaimer "The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact." at the top of each page.

You can't fix stupid. Everyone should know those pics were bait.
 
You dont have to go to any porn sites, all the images are attached. You can clearly see in the attached images it's all the same person, in the same outfit, in the same shoot, and they're claiming to be them.

@FloofyNewfie @ZTHorse am I crazy or are you seeing what I'm seeing??

Profile picture. All you are comparing is the profile picture that this person did not explicitly claim like the other shit he or she posted.
 
You can't fix stupid. Everyone should know those pics were bait.
It's kind of the site moderators job to protect stupid people though. Catfishes shouldn't be tolerated regardless of whether its obvious "bait" or not. The person above claimed that photos were of them, when they weren't... that should be the end of discussion, banned. Noah is right and Oldman is frankly just being intellectually dishonest with his comments.
 
Noah is right cause there were much more than 1 fake pic on profile. I saw at least 5 with 4 of them posted for all to see.
 
It's kind of the site moderators job to protect stupid people though. Catfishes shouldn't be tolerated regardless of whether its obvious "bait" or not. The person above claimed that photos were of them, when they weren't... that should be the end of discussion, banned. Noah is right and Oldman is frankly just being intellectually dishonest with his comments.
Explain "intellectually dishonest".
 
Explain "intellectually dishonest".
Saying the evidence presented isn’t enough when the person explicitly states that the pictures are theirs. The person in their profile picture is clearly the same person as their other posts, including being in the same album on other websites. Just because they didn’t say their profile picture isn’t them doesn’t mean you can’t use logic. Just being honest 🤷‍♀️
 
Saying the evidence presented isn’t enough when the person explicitly states that the pictures are theirs. The person in their profile picture is clearly the same person as their other posts, including being in the same album on other websites. Just because they didn’t say their profile picture isn’t them doesn’t mean you can’t use logic. Just being honest 🤷‍♀️
Yeah but you got to be fair, behaviour on other websites does not violate the rules here. As long as there are no rules broken here, i see no reason to punish this
 
I can appreciate the profile pic is fake.... But, when you post pics in the site...several for that matter which are fake, this is obviously an issue for all to consider.
 
Saying the evidence presented isn’t enough when the person explicitly states that the pictures are theirs. The person in their profile picture is clearly the same person as their other posts, including being in the same album on other websites. Just because they didn’t say their profile picture isn’t them doesn’t mean you can’t use logic. Just being honest 🤷‍♀️
And we are supposed to ban people on a hunch. I wonder how many times over you would have been banned had that been true. You did miss the point though, let me clarify. If you or anyone else wants someone banned, bring clear proof. It is not our job to investigate a fake, we have enough things to worry about. Just being honest 🤷‍♂️
 
Last edited:
It's kind of the site moderators job to protect stupid people though. Catfishes shouldn't be tolerated regardless of whether its obvious "bait" or not. The person above claimed that photos were of them, when they weren't... that should be the end of discussion, banned. Noah is right and Oldman is frankly just being intellectually dishonest with his comments.
Its not our job to fix stupid, thats darwins job.
 
And we are supposed to ban people on a hunch. I wonder how many times over you would have been banned had that been true. You did miss the point though, let me clarify. If you or anyone else wants someone banned, bring clear proof. It is not our job to investigate a fake, we have enough things to worry about. Just being honest 🤷‍♂️
There's no "hunch" though, I'm insure of whether we are seeing two completely different images because the person very clearly says that those images are of them, and evidence is provided that they aren't. Also attacking me for being a woman by comparing it to a person publically shown to be stealing photos is literally why there's no women on this site, or why the women who were here never stay long, refrain from doing so in the future before you look more stupid.
 
Last edited:
My existence on this forum is not based on looking for a human partner. I very rarely care whether I am talking to a woman, a man or a sentient teapot.
Can someone explain to me why we care whether someone is using a fake profile picture or pretends to be a particular gender?
There already is this thread that exposes fake profiles in case someone finds this information useful. On top of that anyone can use the ignore button to seemingly get rid of inconvenient users.
Hey, you think you can hook me up with that sentient teapot you mentioned? I think we'd probably get along well - The idea of deep philosophical discussions over a cuppa really turns my crank, doncha know...
 
Its not our job to fix stupid, thats darwins job.
Well, I've always maintained that stupid should be AT LEAST painful, if not outright fatal... If you can arrange to turn the agonizer up a few notches, there might be an increase in the average intellect around here.
 
This happened to me with xxroughxx... Everything I wanted and then ghosted..I was pretty devastated tbh but very naive. I'm about ready to give up
 
This happened to me with xxroughxx... Everything I wanted and then ghosted..I was pretty devastated tbh but very naive. I'm about ready to give up
I'm sorry that happened to you. That has to be rough. No, do not give up.
 
Well, I've always maintained that stupid should be AT LEAST painful, if not outright fatal... If you can arrange to turn the agonizer up a few notches, there might be an increase in the average intellect around here.
For that to work, you need to be dealing with people at least smart enough to link their stupidity to that agonizer being turned up.
For quite a few here, that just won't happen.
 
Back
Top