• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

The abusive porn cleanup project

I have found abusive content in the past:

  • Total voters
    1,869
Whichever mod/admin worked on this report and sent me this:
"Unfortunately, your recent report has been rejected: Post in thread 'A medley from r/BeastFiction' - I had to read the whole damn story, there is no word teen"

Please observe:
Ctrl+f -> "teen" (search in page)
Took me 60 seconds to find and copy it here.

droolnslobber said:
“It’s nothing,” the teen murmured, bending the fan slightly downwards so her dog could remain relaxed. “I just let some- hey!”
Click to expand...
droolnslobber said:
Glancing up with his dark eyes, he peered right into the teen’s, sitting oddly still.
Click to expand...
droolnslobber said:
The teen sat back down onto the chair, stretching her bare legs and turning the setting on the fan even higher.
Click to expand...
droolnslobber said:
The teen shook her head, then ran a hand through her hair.
Click to expand...
droolnslobber said:
The teen’s green eyes widened when she spotted his raging erection hanging low from between his legs, causing her to gasp.
Click to expand...
droolnslobber said:
The teen gasped- or at least tried to- but couldn't escape due to King pressing his body onto hers, keeping her in place.
Click to expand...
droolnslobber said:
The teen felt his stiff rod pulsate deep in her mouth, her eyes tearing up as she felt him poke the back of her throat.
Click to expand...

I do not really understand how you managed to miss that. :D
@Oldman @FloofyNewfie can we please get this resolved?
I will edit this post and remove the words once you acknowledge that it exists.
 
Last edited:
pes said:
Whichever mod/admin worked on this report and sent me this:
"Unfortunately, your recent report has been rejected: Post in thread 'A medley from r/BeastFiction' - I had to read the whole damn story, there is no word teen"

Please observe:
Ctrl+f -> "teen"









I do not really understand how you managed to miss that. :D
@Oldman @FloofyNewfie can we please get this resolved?
I will edit this post and remove the words once you acknowledge that it exists.
Click to expand...
I skim the whole thing there's definitely a power disposition as well. But it never mentions exact age. But as you say teen indicates most likely underage. So the possibility is in there its up to the mods to look at it
 
Reconscope said:
I skim the whole thing there's definitely a power disposition as well. But it never mentions exact age. But as you say teen indicates most likely underage. So the possibility is in there its up to the mods to look at it
Click to expand...
That should not matter anyway:
WARNING: No posting media with the word "teen." This indicates someone under the age of 18 and will be removed without notice. Likewise, if someone appears to be younger than 18, the content will be removed. Please report anything you think should be reviewed.
 
pes said:
That should not matter anyway:
WARNING: No posting media with the word "teen." This indicates someone under the age of 18 and will be removed without notice. Likewise, if someone appears to be younger than 18, the content will be removed. Please report anything you think should be reviewed.
Click to expand...
The problem is that he also mentions "D-cup breasts" and other indications of adulthood. What you are looking at is an author planting keywords in the story to draw search engine hits and "sell" their story.

It's a technical violation but not hard core pedo.
 
pes said:
That should not matter anyway:
WARNING: No posting media with the word "teen." This indicates someone under the age of 18 and will be removed without notice. Likewise, if someone appears to be younger than 18, the content will be removed. Please report anything you think should be reviewed.
Click to expand...
I just said that. Quit being a robot and actually read my detailed input instead going all rules bot on me. I told ya the rules are violated due to power discrepancy/implied parent figure saying your his bitch from now on. Plus her obliviousness to the situation. Adding also to the fact using the word teen.

I hate speech to text...
 
Reconscope said:
I just said that. Quit being a robot and actually read my detailed input instead going all rules bot on me. I told ya the rules are violated due to power discrepancy/implied parent figure saying your his bitch from now on. Plus her obliviousness to the situation. Adding also to the fact using the word teen.

I hate speech to text...
Click to expand...
Sorry I misunderstood your intention.
 
the worst part about this, is that these types of videos perpetuate the stereotype that sex with animals is immoral. It’s going to be sooooo long before we are ever viewed as decent individuals.
 
pes said:
Over my existence on Zooville I have personally reported content that showed:
1. Animals being forced into sex.
2. Animals being bound, muzzled, held or prevented from moving for the purpose of sex.
3. Animal genitalia being handled incorrectly which includes forceful sucking of a limp penis.
4. Animal rape.
5. Identifiable photos or videos of women being posted without their consent.
Most of which was then removed after a moderator review.
Click to expand...
one major concern I have is issues where this might be happening off-camera but you can't actually see that there's stuff like binding/muzzling because the video is done super-closeup

this makes me think that maybe mods should ban 100% closeup videos since they fail to depict than an animal is unbound

only by seeing the entire animals body can you be sure that it isn't being confined by some unseen device off-panel
 
Dogpilled said:
this makes me think that maybe mods should ban 100% closeup videos
Click to expand...
This is unlikely. But I understand your concern. Very usually when the video is made for money or by someone who regularly invites unknown people to have sex with their animals, the animal is held in place by the owner. But the camera does not show the animal's head. Sometimes though you can see the hands on the side of the frame because avoiding it the whole time is difficult.
 
pes said:
This is unlikely. But I understand your concern. Very usually when the video is made for money or by someone who regularly invites unknown people to have sex with their animals, the animal is held in place by the owner. But the camera does not show the animal's head. Sometimes though you can see the hands on the side of the frame because avoiding it the whole time is difficult.
Click to expand...
yeah the idea of an owner holding it down bothers me...

like I'd love to see just an extended documentary where sex doesn't even happen all the time... like you have some instances where it's bored and walks off and doesn't want to fuck, and that's fine, try to romance it later, etc
 
Dogpilled said:
yeah the idea of an owner holding it down bothers me...

like I'd love to see just an extended documentary where sex doesn't even happen all the time... like you have some instances where it's bored and walks off and doesn't want to fuck, and that's fine, try to romance it later, etc
Click to expand...
Petlust usually shows the entire animals and at least the few videos I remember with dogs were not bad. There is usually nobody else with the animal except the actor and some of those seemed to be zoophiles.
They did have some questionable content too though like a few videos with snakes and I did not watch every single of their videos, but overall they seemed to be a bit better than your usual commercial zoo porn.
They even had some where sex just did not happen because the actor could not get the animal to mount him for example.
 
Y_Knot said:
I'm dropping a fat load for you guys. Open your holes, here it comes.
Click to expand...
2nd video this what it looks like when a nonzoo sucks a dog for money. She can be seen trying to force the sheath over his knot several times. The dog is prevented from getting up several times and she jerks his penis like a human dick which understandably makes the dog want to leave and he is not allowed.
Y_Knot said:
two more:
Click to expand...
The dog gets smacked over his head. How anyone thinks that is good porn is beyond me.
 
Last edited:
Could you have a look at the second video ('Asian mom...')? At the first point of action she seems to gag, but tries to pass it off as moaning. The dog is on his back, and every time he gets up, she puts him down again. In addition, I am not sure this is the way of sucking a dog's penis, or that the penis is even erect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pes
AppleDash said:
Could you have a look at the second video ('Asian mom...')? At the first point of action she seems to gag, but tries to pass it off as moaning. The dog is on his back, and every time he gets up, she puts him down again. In addition, I am not sure this is the way of sucking a dog's penis, or that the penis is even erect.
Click to expand...
It is the same one removed in the post above you. :D Reported again.
I went ahead and reported several other crap clips from that thread too. Do not be afraid of reporting stuff like that.
 
Last edited:
pes said:
It is the same one removed in the post above you. :D Reported again.
I went ahead and reported several other crap clips from that thread too. Do not be afraid of reporting stuff like that.
Click to expand...
IMO that Camilla account seems like straight cancer. Their entire post history screams FORBIDDEN_WEBSITE!. I don't doubt that they will post many more vids like this.
 
Jester said:
IMO that Camilla account seems like straight cancer. Their entire post history screams FORBIDDEN_WEBSITE!. I don't doubt that they will post many more vids like this.
Click to expand...
Feel free to report those. :D 3 bad ones and he is making a new account. :D
 
Do not be afraid of reporting bait videos either. Use this to justify removing content that uses food to trick animals into sexual stuff. I consider that wrong and bad porn and we certainly do not need to see that.

The abusive porn cleanup project

No actually, the majority of content I reported and that was removed was from the women with dogs and women with horses sections. It makes sense as those are the sections that get the most uploads. In fact it does not matter which section you choose to review content from. All of them have the...
www.zoovilleforum.net www.zoovilleforum.net
 
vitaliijn said:
Click to expand...

4:40, 7:40 the horse has his hind legs bound together. 11:14, 13:51 front legs bound too. The entire horse is bound in place and completely prevented from moving.
Are you kidding me? Do you consider that good porn? That is animal abuse and basically rape.

On top of that it is classic commercial crap porn. The horse is also bound in the front, there is no excitement on his part, there is lots of rubbing and shoving the limp penis into places and he is getting soft more of the time than hard. Obviously the actress is not a zoophile absolutely at all. And there is a mare in front of him because obviously the actress knows nothing about how to get a horse hard.

Horse people feel free to review the rest of @vitaliijn threads he asks for a lot of commercial crap.
 
@dartel I saw your "commercial crap" post on that thread mentioned above. Here you can see reporting that crap is worth it. Reports are anonymous unless you decide to post about it. So please next time, consider reporting the abusive commercial animal rape.
 
pes said:
@dartel I saw your "commercial crap" post on that thread mentioned above. Here you can see reporting that crap is worth it. Reports are anonymous unless you decide to post about it. So please next time, consider reporting the abusive commercial animal rape.
Click to expand...
I didn't view it, just the link thumbnail was enough to know what crap it was.
 
pes said:
In the past few weeks I have reported an alarming number of abusive porn videos from the porn section. 90% of them were subsequently removed after a moderator reviewed them and agreed that the content violated animal abuse the rules of this forum.
Over my existence on Zooville I have personally reported content that showed:
1. Animals being forced into sex.
2. Animals being bound, muzzled, held or prevented from moving for the purpose of sex.
3. Animal genitalia being handled incorrectly which includes forceful sucking of a limp penis.
4. Animal rape.
5. Identifiable photos or videos of women being posted without their consent.
Most of which was then removed after a moderator review.
And I have seen other content which is questionable but not directly against the rules or difficult to prove to be abusive like drugged horses, fake cum or animals trained to perform sex all common in commercial zoo porn.

All of these threads and posts had dozens of praising comments and each of these videos had more than 20 likes. Including the last one which showed an unquestionable rape of a dog trying to defend himself. Yet I was apparently the first user who reported it for being abusive. (It shows a little bit about the people using this website and how much they care.)

I understand that due to the high amount of content uploaded to the website, the moderators can not review every video and thus rely on other users reporting bad content.

Because of my setup I can only review certain kinds of content. Large videos and content on some external websites is difficult for me to review because I use TOR.

Therefore I would like to ask the zoophiles of this forum who care about the lives of animals to help with cleaning the porn sections.
Please report abusive content. Use the rules https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/zooville-rules.20410/ your common sense, experience and knowledge of animal body language to identify bad content and report it.
It does not matter if you are wrong in some cases, all reports will be reviewed by moderators anyway and it is their job.
I believe that as zoophiles we should not allow animal abuse to thrive in zoophile communities.

Abuse on here is not isolated to animals only. Some people think that their own sexual desires allow them to post identifiable photos and videos of other people without their consent. This usually has the form of "reaction" videos or photos of someone they would love to see getting fucked. These people (mostly women) need protection too. Posting such content is against the rules and therefore such threads should be reported and removed.

If you are not sure, post a link to the thread in here so others can review it and help with making the right decision.

Also please have a look at these related threads:

How many people regularly review porn and report abuse?

For my own curiosity. I would like to know how many people regularly spend some time reviewing porn in the porn sections looking for bad porn to report and remove.
www.zoovilleforum.net www.zoovilleforum.net

Community cum education efforts

There was recently a discussion here that touches the topic of fake cum used in predominantly commercial zoo porn. https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/horse-question.44067/#post-947723 That brought me to an idea of creating educational material that would undeniably demonstrate what real...
www.zoovilleforum.net www.zoovilleforum.net

Thank you.
Click to expand...
what's your opinion on Dildoging ?
 
TammCa said:
what's your opinion on Dildoging ?
Click to expand...
I consider it wrong.
1. It is not what would naturally happen to a dog's penis at that point of erection. At that point the dog is tied with a female and there is no more thrusting.
2. I am able to have enough sex with my dog to satisfy the hell out of me without using him as a dildo just by letting him do it the way that feels natural to him.

One of the important things a zoo should realize is that you are having sex with an equal partner. You are not supposed to use an animal as a sex toy because you can easily manipulate a dog for example. You are supposed to adapt your expectation to what an animal can offer you, not the other way around.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top