• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

Why is zoophilia such a sexualized community?

Oh yeah, definitely seen some of those lol, always a fun read.

Yeah, but sometimes there's new stuff, never anything new with the niche stuff though, it's unfortunate 😔
are you able to explain the dichotomy of being asexual on a sexuality oriented website while consuming pornography?

Nothing rude. I legitimately don’t get it.
 
are you able to explain the dichotomy of being asexual on a sexuality oriented website while consuming pornography?

Nothing rude. I legitimately don’t get it.

Maybe labeling myself as asexual to some degree I can jump in here a bit. Asexuality doesn't necessarily preclude sexual urge entirely, and large portions of attraction may be more from solo mental than cooperative physical interaction. This is where I'm at with it.

It's also exceedingly helpful as a shorthand when talking to people, because "It's complicated" raises many questions that "I'm asexual" does not. Sometimes I feel like a "fake" asexual, and I might be, but shit be messy out here homie. The label tightens things up quite a bit.

I also don't fly the flag, don't consider myself part of the LGBT crowd, and don't lean on it as a large part of my identity personally.
 
are you able to explain the dichotomy of being asexual on a sexuality oriented website while consuming pornography?

Nothing rude. I legitimately don’t get it.
Yeah, no problem at all, I enjoy sating people's curiosity about me. While I am on the asexual spectrum, I'm not sex averse in any way, I just don't feel sexual attraction like most people, like if I were to go with a more specific label, it'd be demisexual or greysexual if you'd care enough to look them up lol, most don't.

To sum it up, I have aesthetic attraction rather than sexual attraction, I see things that I find pretty, but don't wanna fuck them, I'd be fine with sex if the opportunity presents itself, but I don't actively seek it out or desire it.
 
Maybe labeling myself as asexual to some degree I can jump in here a bit. Asexuality doesn't necessarily preclude sexual urge entirely,
I thought that’s exactly what it means. That’s the reason for the confusion. I guess there is a spectrum, as with most things of this sort. 🤷🏽‍♀️

and large portions of attraction may be more from solo mental than cooperative physical interaction. This is where I'm at with it.
I feel that. The older I get, the less interesting it becomes.
It's also exceedingly helpful as a shorthand when talking to people, because "It's complicated" raises many questions that "I'm asexual" does not.
I understand that part for sure. When I tell people I’m a woman that dislikes being penetrated their fucking heads explode. It just cannot be!
Sometimes I feel like a "fake" asexual, and I might be, but shit be messy out here homie. The label tightens things up quite a bit.
Makes sense

I also don't fly the flag, don't consider myself part of the LGBT crowd, and don't lean on it as a large part of my identity personally.
Neither do I. It’s nobody else’s business and it isn’t a personality aspect.
 
...like if I were to go with a more specific label, it'd be demisexual or greysexual if you'd care enough to look them up lol, most don't....

Yeah, this is the thing largely as well. I feel like I probably could find a hyper specific niche category that describes me more accurately, but I'm trying to use this a shorthand to trim down a conversation that I honestly find pretty boring, and as soon as people need to start googling stuff to keep up it's gone in a direction that is really inane. Asexual is the closest thing that's at least on the periphery of understanding for folks.

Like, I like electronic music a LOT, but people looooooooove to use microgenres that like, one group is making music in. Yeah, yeah, I get it. This isn't house music. It's dark ambient minimal micro tech house. Fantastic. :rolleyes:
 
Yeah, no problem at all, I enjoy sating people's curiosity about me. While I am on the asexual spectrum, I'm not sex averse in any way, I just don't feel sexual attraction like most people, like if I were to go with a more specific label, it'd be demisexual or greysexual if you'd care enough to look them up lol, most don't.
It’s unlikely to enter my life often. What you do shouldn’t matter to anyone if you aren’t hurting anyone. I just wondered about the dichotomy.

To sum it up, I have aesthetic attraction rather than sexual attraction, I see things that I find pretty, but don't wanna fuck them, I'd be fine with sex if the opportunity presents itself, but I don't actively seek it out or desire it.
Hmmm. I totally understand. Are you very young? This is naturally how it becomes as one ages and hormones change.
 
It’s unlikely to enter my life often. What you do shouldn’t matter to anyone if you aren’t hurting anyone. I just wondered about the dichotomy.


Hmmm. I totally understand. Are you very young? This is naturally how it becomes as one ages and hormones change.
Yep, I'm 19, but been this way since I noticed my peers felt very differently about things.
 
I think it's just a sexual thing. So much can be a "fetish" if looked at it from the outside. We all pee, but what makes it more exciting to watch someone else do it? At least for me liking to watch women. Driven my exes crazy wanting to watch and they just wanted to do what we all do everyday. Why as a young boy was the Victoria Secrets catalog exciting, it's just clothing, and then hitting a jackpot if we stumble on a Playboy in Dad's closet! Heck, I remember my friend and I stumbling on a Playboy in the bushes when we were in middle school. We went through it with a fine toothed comb splitting up the pictures between us. lol

It's probably partially wired in our head as exciting, could be because it isn't what people see or experience everyday. If you're on the outside, it's a fantasy, but maybe different if it's in your life. I want to win the lottery too. But maybe I'll be bored being rich! And I think I might have better odds with that fantasy than this one. :)
 
I thought that’s exactly what it means. That’s the reason for the confusion. I guess there is a spectrum, as with most things of this sort. 🤷🏽‍♀️


I feel that. The older I get, the less interesting it becomes.

I understand that part for sure. When I tell people I’m a woman that dislikes being penetrated their fucking heads explode. It just cannot be!

Makes sense


Neither do I. It’s nobody else’s business and it isn’t a personality aspect.
My head didnt explode, but you did just make me spit coffee thru my nose.....does that count?

Seriously, the way you said that part about not liking being penetrated made me laugh pretty damn hard.....peoples reaction to the news, I mean.

And on your last point.......I just do not understand people who are a sum total of any one single aspect.........people like that are just so fucking shallow and I find them very tedious....I would say I pity them, if I actually suffered from that affliction, but I only use that word because I have no better description for how I see them.....unless that word is maybe....non-entity........
 
My head didnt explode, but you did just make me spit coffee thru my nose.....does that count?

Seriously, the way you said that part about not liking being penetrated made me laugh pretty damn hard.....peoples reaction to the news, I mean.

And on your last point.......I just do not understand people who are a sum total of any one single aspect.........people like that are just so fucking shallow and I find them very tedious....I would say I pity them, if I actually suffered from that affliction, but I only use that word because I have no better description for how I see them.....unless that word is maybe....non-entity........
It’s wild. All the women I’ve told have said some version of “meh. makes sense.”

Every man I’ve ever told has either told me I’m lying/joking/wasting his time or he just stares at me like I’m a fuckin alien 😅. Or <insert ACME Brand “you haven’t had mine yet” dick joke> Every. Single. Fucking. Quagmire. Time. Heh heh heh…. All riiiiight.

/kms
 
Or <insert ACME Brand “you haven’t had mine yet” dick joke> Every. Single. Fucking. Quagmire. Time. Heh heh heh…. All riiiiight.

/kms

Goddaaaaaaaaamn yes. This comes up with the ace thing all the goddamn time. People are like, cmon, I'll show you, it's fucking awesome. As though I've been waiting for the chance and it just hasn't come up until they came along.
 
It’s wild. All the women I’ve told have said some version of “meh. makes sense.”

Every man I’ve ever told has either told me I’m lying/joking/wasting his time or he just stares at me like I’m a fuckin alien 😅. Or <insert ACME Brand “you haven’t had mine yet” dick joke> Every. Single. Fucking. Quagmire. Time. Heh heh heh…. All riiiiight.

/kms
Honestly, I dont find it any type of challenge to MY manhood. My thought there is 'How the fuck could it possibly be?'

Its not like you tried mine and then decided none of that worked for you, lol

And I also dont seem to be single source wired straight from brain to dick either, so to me, looking at it rationally, I dont actually understand what these guys are actually thinking honestly.

To my thinking, having THAT view of things is right there with the whole and ENTIRE concept that anyone anywhere who is lesbian is just not being exposed to the correct (magic) cock and thats the reason why.......total fucking lunacy propped up entirely upon either an over-inflated ego or a severe lack of common fucking sense, or both.
 
Honestly, I dont find it any type of challenge to MY manhood. My thought there is 'How the fuck could it possibly be?'

Its not like you tried mine and then decided none of that worked for you, lol

And I also dont seem to be single source wired straight from brain to dick either, so to me, looking at it rationally, I dont actually understand what these guys are actually thinking honestly.

To my thinking, having THAT view of things is right there with the whole and ENTIRE concept that anyone anywhere who is lesbian is just not being exposed to the correct (magic) cock and thats the reason why.......total fucking lunacy propped up entirely upon either an over-inflated ego or a severe lack of common fucking sense, or both.
Without a doubt. It’s so cliche and stereotypical, but this thing actually happens.
 
There may a few things to do with this.

In my opinion, it could be because in forums like this, people want to share their sexuality with their partners; others come to see the content people upload. People don't usually talk first about how much we love our partners or how we enjoy sex and how it makes us feel happy and fulfilled, with a more loving perspective.

Sexual focus also varies between owners and non-owners, as the first can freely enjoy sexual with their partners and have the opportunity to experience happiness outside of sex.

This was my case. My mindset changed over the months with my dog. My sexual focus diminished, and I began to enjoy other activities a lot.
 
I think this begs the question of if it's confined to this site, or if the "issue" pervades the "community" at large. Probably hard to detangle.
I know it's been a few weeks but I figured I may as well respond to this point.

I have been to a lot of different zoophile website presences in the past few years, and this one is definitely much more hypersexualized than any of the other ones I have seen. This site has a bad reputation among many other groups of zoophiles. Even groups of zoophiles who disagree with eachother on a lot of other points will usually agree that ZooVille is not representative of the broader zoo community.

As far as other forums go:
- The Zoo Community forum denounces most of what is found in this place. That is to be expected, as they are a PG-13 community that focuses more on the relational aspect.
- The Zoocadia forum was created in part to escape the sex-addiction found on Zooville so more 'modest' users could have conversations in peace. People commonly make jokes over there about "pornhounds" coming from Zooville and finding out there's no porn.
- The Zoo Writers' Guild forum is very much unlike this place and is far more text-oriented than porn-oriented. There are a lot of old-guard zoos there because that forum has been around longer than this one.

A lot of zoo media outlets denounce this place too:
- The Zooier than Thou podcast used to support Zooville, but they had a falling out with the former administrator and became disenchanted with the site. They now see it as a harmful presence in the zoo community due to the attitudes about human-animal relationships fostered here.
- The Bestia Amore podcast's main host railed against this site for violation of the Zeta Principles, and even made a few videos exposing it. BAPC and ZooTT disagreed on mostly everything, so the fact that they agreed on this point should tell you something.
- The zoo magazine, Zooey Dot Pub, definitely has some tensions with this site which it brought up during an interview with Z T Horse in one of its articles. The ZDP discord server, now defunct, was also PG-13 oriented and the articles of their magazine give a much different interpretation of what zoophilia is than is found here.

The atmosphere in zoo groups on social media is nothing like it is here:
- The zoophile community of Twitter and Mastodon (made mostly of the same people) is very much against this website. The name of Zooville is commonly invoked as a prime example of what not to be. As many gripes as I have with the Zeta community of social media, I can see their points here. The word "fetishist" is used almost like a slur on zoo Twitter. Also, most people on zoo twitter do/support activism to show that zoophilia isn't "bad"; you can see how this would run totally contrary to the general attitude toward zoophilia here, which sees it as degrading/shameful. People on these sites frequently have a much higher view of animals than they do here.
- Zoo communities on Discord frequently disallow sexual discussions and focus more on conversations and offering a sense of community between zoophiles. They commonly repeat the theme that sex should only be one aspect of the relationship and should not dominate it. They also reject the idea that zoophilia is a "kink", calling it an orientation, and believe strongly that treating zoophilia as nothing more than a fetish is degradant of zoophiles and of animals.
 
Even groups of zoophiles who disagree with eachother on a lot of other points will usually agree that ZooVille is not representative of the broader zoo community.

Being pretty new in this space but having seen some of the other communities, I would actually disagree with this. That's ultimately why I think I like it here. This IS representative of the zoo community (By numbers, it IS the broader community, methinks), if you don't start to get hyper specific with what is and is not "a zoo". Nobody in the real world is going to hear my treatise on what a "real" zoo is, nobody is going to care, so for better or worse the composite of the people here is, effectively, what a zoo is. I guess in the same way that there's a "correct" pronunciation of the word "flaccid" but ain't nobody other than a hyper specific set of people saying it like that.

I'm terrified of giving myself some kind of fucked up confirmation bias so this place is my jam because I see the counter examples and dark side of what "this" is.

I do not want to be labeled a zoo anymore other than for purposes of shorthand communication here because it is not and won't ever be a "good" label. I'm a guy, I dig dogs, I do other stuff. I'm not a zoo.
 
Last edited:
Being pretty new in this space but having seen some of the other communities, I would actually disagree with this. That's ultimately why I think I like it here. This IS representative of the zoo community (By numbers, it IS the broader community, methinks), if you don't start to get hyper specific with what is and is not "a zoo". Nobody in the real world is going to hear my treatise on what a "real" zoo is, nobody is going to care, so for better or worse the composite of the people here is, effectively, what a zoo is. I guess in the same way that there's a "correct" pronunciation of the word "flaccid" but ain't nobody other than a hyper specific set of people saying it like that.

I'm terrified of giving myself some kind of fucked up confirmation bias so this place is my jam because I see the counter examples and dark side of what "this" is.

I do not want to be labeled a zoo anymore other than for purposes of shorthand communication here because it is not and won't ever be a "good" label. I'm a guy, I dig dogs, I do other stuff. I'm not a zoo.

I see. I think you are searching more for an observational sample of what zoophiles are, whereas people like the Zeta community are giving a normative prescription of how zoophiles ought to be.

Personally, I'm not so much interested in determining who is and isn't a "true zoophile" (it devolves into an ego-stroking contest) as I am in determining who is and isn't a well-rounded person who I wouldn't mind conversing with. It just so happens that those other communities I named have a higher density of that decent type of person than can be found on forums such as this. (there are good people here, don't get me wrong)

I value things like manners and moderation, and believe standards of conduct should be encouraged in zoo spaces. Not because I want to "impress" anybody or make some invisible onlooking audience of antis change their mind about anything; I value these traits because they make my experience more enjoyable. If someone's objectifying attitudes toward animals make me uncomfortable, I don't really care if they're a "true zoo" or not, that comes second to being a respectable person. Just because myself and someone else shares the singular trait of attraction to a nonhuman species, does not bind me to considering that person my fellow countryman or anything. A community is built on more than that.

You seem to be thinking about this on the large-scale, like "What does it matter if zoophiles are polite to each other, society won't accept us anyway". I'm not as concerned about that; I'm thinking "It matters if to me if zoophiles are polite because I would rather be in the company of polite people, zoophile or not".
 
You seem to be thinking about this on the large-scale, like "What does it matter if zoophiles are polite to each other, society won't accept us anyway". I'm not as concerned about that; I'm thinking "It matters if to me if zoophiles are polite because I would rather be in the company of polite people, zoophile or not".

I'm also coming at it from the angle of a certain amount of dickhead adds some spice lol. I have the same misgivings about zoocadia as I do with Reddit, I guess.
 
I mean… Which community made up of humans + <Insert paraphilia> *isn’t* sexualized that’s the real question lol. we humans think with our crotches 80 to 90% of the time… there’s a reason there are 8.1 billion humans…
 
Back
Top