What to do

E

edomsd

Tourist
I live next to a big park. I walk my dogs and always see and meet people with dogs. I run into several single women with in tact dogs. Why else would a woman have an in tact dog but for sex? Not saying all of them but most.

Is it a safe enough assumption to start to hint with any of them or is it too risky?
 
edomsd said:
I live next to a big park. I walk my dogs and always see and meet people with dogs. I run into several single women with in tact dogs. Why else would a woman have an in tact dog but for sex? Not saying all of them but most.

Is it a safe enough assumption to start to hint with any of them or is it too risky?
Click to expand...
Well for different reasons, health reasons first of all.
 
edomsd said:
wouldn't they neuter the dog for health reasons? not keep their balls?
Click to expand...
It's healthier for the dog to have his ball's, the reason they do it it's because they mostly become less dominant and don't pee on every conner.

It's healthier for the dog to grow up as he should be growing up his testosterone will build them the way they should be build.
 
And ofcourse the reproducing affected, they mostly get neutered for the benefit of humans not for the benefit of the dog itself.
 
I personally would not dare to try to hint someone about any kind of zoo live, it can really mes you up privately and even iff someone is zoo they would not admit it either way.
 
edomsd said:
I live next to a big park. I walk my dogs and always see and meet people with dogs. I run into several single women with in tact dogs. Why else would a woman have an in tact dog but for sex? Not saying all of them but most.

Is it a safe enough assumption to start to hint with any of them or is it too risky?
Click to expand...
no it's not.
It's wishful thinking and a bit stupid.
 
omonundro said:
3.8% of women admit they are into zoo.
Click to expand...
lol

I'll go a step further. Before you even start asking, Cut that number in half to account for how any such women are going to respond to a rando man asking. Then, once you start asking, just go ahead and cut it in half again.

That .95% that you end up with is the number you should start with in any and every case, even if the survey numbers come in at 40% of women instead of 3.8%, because this is secret, secret shit and no woman is owning this to anyone she doesn't have a very, very compelling reason to admit anything to.

The numbers, any numbers, that appear to exist on this site are at best, a mirage that only exists here on this site, and any site similar to this site.
 
I think you all are over thinking this this is just a simple question asking what to do when you go out in public an you see a female dog owner an you wonder if she enjoys her dog just like I do and it’s more of a fantasy and I’m sure others can relate
 
hornymilf23 said:
I think you all are over thinking this this is just a simple question asking what to do when you go out in public an you see a female dog owner an you wonder if she enjoys her dog just like I do and it’s more of a fantasy and I’m sure others can relate
Click to expand...
Sure. I can, and do relate. I do the same all the time.

Unfortunately, when it's posted here, it has a much different context. One that's very common here and used to phish out cyber whackers, usually to another off-site location for........chat.
 
We've all seen it a hundred times or more. That's why it gets the responses it does. New accounts or porn whacker accounts are the only ones who ever answer as if its a serious question.

It is what it is.
 
omonundro said:
3.8% of women admit they are into zoo.
Click to expand...
you might want to take a walk in the Real world, and get out of this echo chamber....Every REAL study since the 1880s has come up with the same approximate numbers. 3 %+ - of women, 5%+ - of men have had some sexual contact with animals....not experience...CONTACT....Krafft Ebbing, Kinsey, Masters and Johnson, Hite, even the much beloved Hani Miletski, whose methods were not pristine, found the same basic numbers. Contact is not "Experience"....That number will be smaller. Wishing doesnt make it so.
 
Idk if this is a thread already probably idk but when out in public how many people out there walking their dogs. Have relationships with them. I know that of course it's not everyone but just always curious.
 
Yeah, we have not had a new instance of this thread for at least a half of a day. :D
Post moved.
It is called wishful thinking.
 
saddlebum66 said:
you might want to take a walk in the Real world, and get out of this echo chamber....Every REAL study since the 1880s has come up with the same approximate numbers. 3 %+ - of women, 5%+ - of men have had some sexual contact with animals....not experience...CONTACT....Krafft Ebbing, Kinsey, Masters and Johnson, Hite, even the much beloved Hani Miletski, whose methods were not pristine, found the same basic numbers. Contact is not "Experience"....That number will be smaller. Wishing doesnt make it so.
Click to expand...
Three percent makes three per hundred. In a city of 6000 that's 180. That's enough to fill your local VFW hall...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top