• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

The Morality of Beastiality

So I wanted to share my own personal philosophy and see what your opinions are on the subject.

I recently had a discussion on here and I wanted to elaborate on my thoughts about the morality of beastiality.

Firstly I’d like to say that I am not disrespecting anyone’s lifestyle and everyone is entitled to do whatever they please. I am simply just sharing my own personal philosophy.

To begin I would like to start by saying that I believe beastiality is ethically okay as long as the animal is consenting. Which I personally believe that consent is the most important part.

I believe that it is morally wrong to have intercorse with a female animal as she cannot consent to penetration and there for it is ethical wrong and no different from rape in my mind.

However, I believe that a female offering herself to an animal and that animal choosing to engage her is completely acceptable and ethical as that animal is consenting to penetrate her.

The grey area is when is comes to that female training a male animal to penetrate her which is effectively high jacking that animals reward system and that then becomes unconsentual as you are manipulating that animals reward system into intercourse.

I appreciate you taking the time to read this and I am interested in hearing what you have to share about this and I am an open person and looking forward to reading your opinions.

TL:DR Penetration on female animals is unconsentual and therefore wrong. Where as a male animal penetrating a female is consensual and ethically acceptable.
 
First of all there is no morality of beastiality, because beastiality is not a word. :D

To begin I would like to start by saying that I believe beastiality is ethically okay as long as the animal is consenting. Which I personally believe that consent is the most important part.

I believe that it is morally wrong to have intercorse with a female animal as she cannot consent to penetration and there for it is ethical wrong and no different from rape in my mind.
These two sentences are contradicting each other.
If an animal or a species is capable of consent, then both the male and the female can consent.
In fact the consent or lack of consent is clearly visible in a lot of species coming from both sexes.


TL:DR Penetration on female animals is unconsentual and therefore wrong. Where as a male animal penetrating a female is consensual and ethically acceptable.
This is actually nonsense. :D
If a female can not consent, then a male penetrating the female did not get a consent and therefore it would also be rape. :D
 
So I wanted to share my own personal philosophy and see what your opinions are on the subject.

I recently had a discussion on here and I wanted to elaborate on my thoughts about the morality of beastiality.

Firstly I’d like to say that I am not disrespecting anyone’s lifestyle and everyone is entitled to do whatever they please. I am simply just sharing my own personal philosophy.

To begin I would like to start by saying that I believe beastiality is ethically okay as long as the animal is consenting. Which I personally believe that consent is the most important part.

I believe that it is morally wrong to have intercorse with a female animal as she cannot consent to penetration and there for it is ethical wrong and no different from rape in my mind.

However, I believe that a female offering herself to an animal and that animal choosing to engage her is completely acceptable and ethical as that animal is consenting to penetrate her.

The grey area is when is comes to that female training a male animal to penetrate her which is effectively high jacking that animals reward system and that then becomes unconsentual as you are manipulating that animals reward system into intercourse.

I appreciate you taking the time to read this and I am interested in hearing what you have to share about this and I am an open person and looking forward to reading your opinions.

TL:DR Penetration on female animals is unconsentual and therefore wrong. Where as a male animal penetrating a female is consensual and ethically acceptable.
images.jpg
 
First of all there is no morality of beastiality, because beastiality is not a word. :D


These two sentences are contradicting each other.
If an animal or a species is capable of consent, then both the male and the female can consent.
In fact the consent or lack of consent is clearly visible in a lot of species coming from both sexes.



This is actually nonsense. :D
If a female can not consent, then a male penetrating the female did not get a consent and therefore it would also be rape. :D
^--- This!
 
Female dog will walk away, tuck her tail, and bite your hand etc.
A male dog can also be trained as if it were a mandatory command that he must execute.

This male dog is fine because he mounts the women on his own, which is a fucking weak argument, but it comes up all the time on this forum, like will the penis penetrate my uterus or will my egg be fertilized.
 
Back
Top