No need to take away the rank, keep being a moderator. I have listed the three options, small, medium and high penalty strength levels.For everyone else, even worse videos will be deleted and that's it. And what do you want from me now? I am welcome to give up my position here if desired. Don't have a problem with that. I don't have to be a moderator.
There is so much garbage posted here every day. Nobody remembers a post that was online for 3 days. And only one person had a problem with it.
I would like a solution where you remain the moderator and nothing changes, while the users will be satisfied that the "law works" on ZV.There is so much garbage posted here every day. Nobody remembers a post that was online for 3 days. And only one person had a problem with it.
And it was poop water that came out during filming that you couldn't see at the time. not more.
To clarify, I meant about the porn cleanup project as a whole! I realize I posted just generally into this thread without reading the convo. My bad!I'm completely new here, but I'm glad to see these measures are being taken. This site seems like it's really trying to maintain integrity and that's seriously appreciated
so u say u dont see that u done a wrong thing there and shouldnt do better in future? if yes then a ban is not enough ...Just block me for 7 days and be done with it. But a ban for the first “offense” would be very harsh. Others don't even get a warning for misbehavior.
I said the ban as an option if the people revolt.Just block me for 7 days and be done with it. But a ban for the first “offense” would be very harsh. Others don't even get a warning for misbehavior.
are we reading through the same thread?it's already starting to be on track.
"i think keeping literal shit out of this forum is snowflakery" (there is a strict no scat rule is there not?)
When it comes to animals, humans included, pushing fecal matter into the vagina is a one ticket way towards giving them an infection, as fecal matter contains e.coli and other dangerous bacteria. Poop is well... nasty. But like I mentioned, equines are more hardy when it comes to that, but it's still not a good idea in the slightest. @Mare Lover 1975 even said that he'd clean the area up himself, and not leave it like that.I have the feeling that someone simply doesn't want me here. That's why it turns out like this.
So instead of addressing the concerns, you'd rather bury your head in the sand. That's not a good look.That was my last comment on the topic.
Linking to that evidence would be useful.#2 He has posted questionable content in the past.
Yes. Please do that.So how about taking away the mod Status
It has been done.Yes. Please do that.
You just have no idea. These are exactly the people who are most upsetgetting himself deleted and demodded before admitting that he done something wrong shows much how he handles animals - a good solution then
yes, because dirt is in any way similar to fecal matter and fecal matter magically stops being fecal matter if watered down a little making it not a scat anymore.If you declare this kind of mild buttwater "scat", then everything should be deleted that's other than previously carefully detailed human-animal interaction. Not even natural dirt allowed then, lol.
No, I did not recommend removal of mod status (I don't think so anyways) but there is where the pickle was. Seems like people where not quite understanding me, what can we do that isn't largely symbolic and has no meaning. It's a shame that it came to that, but necessary given the facts and the responses from Welsh.So a day later here is what I see.
People are upset. Something should be done.
Several mods agree that something should be done.
Welshpony's response to this is not satisfactory.
A warning point for a mod is pointless, since mods can remove those.
A 7 day ban for anyone is basically nothing, less punishment the less online you are in general in fact.
So how about taking away the mod status?
@FloofyNewfie you are the only admin who responded to this, so you opinion?
@Oldman you suggested it in the first place?
Linking to that evidence would be useful.
Honestly, I'm utterly befuddled by the way he handled this. Multiple people have stated that he's actively putting the animal he's supposed to be caring for in potential danger by pushing fecal matter into her vagina, as it's an absolutely risky behavior that could potentially lead to pretty serious health ramifications. As mentioned, fecal material contains bacteria like E.coli and other dangerous infection agents. Just because, from my understanding, mares are a bit hardier in that regard, I did not state that it wasn't dangerous behavior, as it very much is. Yet, his response was to ignore the majority of those that were legitimately concerned about the animal's welfare, and proclaim that nothing was wrong with his dangerous behavior, despite the overwhelming evidence against his actions. Now, where have we seen that type of response from?but necessary given the facts and the responses from Welsh.
I protect he because anyone can be wrong and make mistakes. People make mistakes, do stupid things, there are worse days when they say things they don't really mean. Deleting the content and admitting the mistake and reacting appropriately would have been sufficient.and why do you seem to be defending him?