The abusive porn cleanup project

I have found abusive content in the past:


  • Total voters
    1,510
(Un)surprisingly interspecies videos like this get a lot of praise on here.
reminds me of a low quality clip of a donkey topping a great dane gal that was posted here and got stupidly large amount of praise. it was uncomfortable to just watch.....
 
If it is and there was a response, please share it here as I would love to know what the OP thought was enjoyable about it.
 
This is likely the worst canine video I have seen here so far. It literarly made me physically sick. What the fuck is wring with people? And how could anyone share that with feeling that "yeah, this is some good stuff"
 
This is likely the worst canine video I have seen here so far. It literarly made me physically sick. What the fuck is wring with people? And how could anyone share that with feeling that "yeah, this is some good stuff"
Welcome to the The abusive porn cleanup project. A futile effort to teach people that animal are not sex toys.
 
Welcome to the The abusive porn cleanup project. A futile effort to teach people that animal are not sex toys.
I do appreciate your effort even more after this experience, this requires hella strong stomach
 
Well, more reviewers would be appreciated any time. There is a lot of porn on here.
 
@nicebeast your Chinese milf thread was removed before you managed to answer the question.
It was removed because the video was rightfully deemed to be abusive.
Can you please explain your thought process here then? Why did you decide that that video is good porn and enjoyable?
 
Zoonecrophilia room found on zooville's matrix chat. Reporting to mods.
No scat/necro content. This includes video, audio, text, and digital images.
@Oldman @ZTHorse Can we get rid of that literal animal abuse?
I am not going to join the room to see what is inside, but all the 10 people there probably deserve a ban.
 
Last edited:
11 People in the necro group now, someone read it here and apparently felt it is a good idea to join. Unless it is an admin.
 
Created a temp account (over tor, deleted now) here is the user list and activity list from the room.
Screenshot from 2021-05-171.pngScreenshot from 2021-05-172.pngScreenshot from 2021-05-173.png
Mind the accounts that specifically say "anyone into necro".
Some of these people have accounts with the same name on the forum.
 
@FloofyNewfie I have a question.
When someone's thread is removed and the person gets an explanation of why it was removed, does it usually contain the reason and the explanation of what was wrong in the content? For example in the case above will the user be told that the video contained dildogging and why it was wrong or that dog cum does not in fact look like yogurt?
 
@FloofyNewfie I have a question.
When someone's thread is removed and the person gets an explanation of why it was removed, does it usually contain the reason and the explanation of what was wrong in the content? For example in the case above will the user be told that the video contained dildogging and why it was wrong or that dog cum does not in fact look like yogurt?
I cannot speak for all the mods on here, as I'd imagine that some mods check the "send notification" box while other mods might not. I usually do send a notification myself. But I typically keep it sort of vague. Such as, "Removed due to mishandling of a dog penis." or "Removed due to hobbled/restrained mare." and sometimes even, "Removed due to being highly questionable content." I typically do not go into a big long explanation about the exact reason why it's been removed. Not only that, but those notification boxes have a character limit. However, if I feel the need to hand out a warning infraction, then I'll sometime send the offending party a PM with a little more of a breakdown to the reason why their video was removed. If it's straight up rape or zoosadism, like not even remotely gray area content, I'll typically just ban the user with the ban reason being something like "posting animal rape content" or "posting zoosadism content."
 
I cannot speak for all the mods on here, as I'd imagine that some mods check the "send notification" box while other mods might not. I usually do send a notification myself. But I typically keep it sort of vague. Such as, "Removed due to mishandling of a dog penis." or "Removed due to hobbled/restrained mare." and sometimes even, "Removed due to being highly questionable content." I typically do not go into a big long explanation about the exact reason why it's been removed. Not only that, but those notification boxes have a character limit. However, if I feel the need to hand out a warning infraction, then I'll sometime send the offending party a PM with a little more of a breakdown to the reason why their video was removed. If it's straight up rape or zoosadism, like not even remotely gray area content, I'll typically just ban the user with the ban reason being something like "posting animal rape content" or "posting zoosadism content."
Thanks for the explanation. I would like to propose a new idea to the people who review and report porn. Since the thread is usually removed before the user is able to read the comment explaining in detail what was wrong with their content, there is limited or no lesson learned moment.
Therefore when you report a thread mention the user in here, make sure it is clear which of their threads we are talking about and copy your explanation to your comment here. This way the user will have a chance to read why their thread was reported and learn from their mistakes accompanied with a chance to discuss the problem in here and get further answers. This will encourage the people to actually think and consider the reasons rather than simply tossing the email into the trash and forgetting it.
 
I cannot speak for all the mods on here, as I'd imagine that some mods check the "send notification" box while other mods might not. I usually do send a notification myself. But I typically keep it sort of vague. Such as, "Removed due to mishandling of a dog penis." or "Removed due to hobbled/restrained mare." and sometimes even, "Removed due to being highly questionable content." I typically do not go into a big long explanation about the exact reason why it's been removed. Not only that, but those notification boxes have a character limit. However, if I feel the need to hand out a warning infraction, then I'll sometime send the offending party a PM with a little more of a breakdown to the reason why their video was removed. If it's straight up rape or zoosadism, like not even remotely gray area content, I'll typically just ban the user with the ban reason being something like "posting animal rape content" or "posting zoosadism content."
I do the same.
 
Thanks for the explanation. I would like to propose a new idea to the people who review and report porn. Since the thread is usually removed before the user is able to read the comment explaining in detail what was wrong with their content, there is limited or no lesson learned moment.
Therefore when you report a thread mention the user in here, make sure it is clear which of their threads we are talking about and copy your explanation to your comment here. This way the user will have a chance to read why their thread was reported and learn from their mistakes accompanied with a chance to discuss the problem in here and get further answers. This will encourage the people to actually think and consider the reasons rather than simply tossing the email into the trash and forgetting it.
There is a character limit to what we can send as the notification.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pes
Horse people please educate the audience in that thread if you want.

@Todd55 I am reporting your thread Hot Latina With Horse, the reason is below.
24 likes, several praising comments.

Classic commercial crap porn. The horse appears to be drugged, there is no flare, no excitement, half erect all the time, the way the woman is handling the penis is absolutely wrong too. The horse looses erection several times. Includes stupid fake moaning. The penis is shoved into various orifices with no reaction from the horse at all.
Quite honestly you can not even get an erection watching this.
For reference this is what an excited horse looks like:
Notice that if that happened to the poor sad faketress there, she would end up in the hospital.
 
Unfortunately not only animals are abused in porn.
Some people think that they are entitled to post identifiable photos and videos of other people without their consent like in this thread: https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/is-this-real.30428/#post-605879
This usually affects women and therefore they need protection too.
If you see someone posting "reaction" videos or other material where the participants are identifiable but do not appear to be into animals, ask whether they have the consent of the participants and report the thread.
This falls under:
2. No flaming. No doxing; This includes posting full picture images of an individuals face, name, or any PII (Personally Identifiable Information.) Including harassment of members. Infractions and a possible ban depending on severity will be in order. Please use respect with each other. Disagreements happen. If a disagreement starts to get heated. LEAVE THE DISCUSSION.
 
This is an example of how to not jerk off a dog, in fact this gif comes from a video which has been removed several times already.
50 likes.
A few posts above that you can see an example of fake elemer's glue cum. And the whole thread contains several other gifs of women rubbing dog penises this way or riding them on their back which is also an uncomfortable position for dogs.
For reference this comes from a vet guide to semen collection:

...In the typical setting, ejaculation in the dog is a voluntary process and cannot be forced or rushed. The dog needs to be relaxed and comfortable with the place and the people involved...
...It is important to be aware of the onset of penile erection. Some males will achieve erection without any manual manipulation. Other males require brisk massage of the bulbus glandis through the prepuce to elicit erection. As soon as erection begins, the prepuce is moved proximally such that the entire prepuce is proximal to the exposed bulbus glandis. Failure to reposition the prepuce at the correct time may result in an inability to slide the prepuce proximally over the bulbis glandis. The collection process may then become painful to the dog as the skin of the prepuce tightens over the engorged bulbis glandis...
...The collector uses his or her thumb and finger to form a ring proximal to the bulbis glandis and pressure is applied to the penis circumferentially, thus simulating the copulatory lock or "tie."...

Notice that nothing there says that you should be jerking the penis up and down along the shaft like a human dick because that is not how dogs work and people who do not care or have not yet understood that or are paid to not care do this wrong.
 
Back
Top