The abusive porn cleanup project

I have found abusive content in the past:

  • Total voters
    1,543
HugDoggy said:
Can I ask one of you horse guys/girls there is a picture in this post with a large belt like strap around the stallions penis, I can't really tell how tight it is, but surely it would stop retraction and potentially might block the urethra. preventing peeing or ejaculating. Is it abusive?
Given the position of the back legs (it looks like he's squatting) the horse does not look comfortable.
Click to expand...
Yea, that looks like some improvised cock ring to make the stallion harder once the blood starts flowing down there.
Depending on how hard it is tightened, that could be really unpleasant/painful, especially as it grows in girth.
The bent leg/squatting in the picture does not say that much by itself, but could be him thinking something is pulling on his thing and he is bending down, but too little evidence to know if that is the case.

Picture 3 for those who are wondering.
 
MrsShemon said:
Yea, that looks like some improvised cock ring to make the stallion harder once the blood starts flowing down there.
Depending on how hard it is tightened, that could be really unpleasant/painful, especially as it grows in girth.
The bent leg/squatting in the picture does not say that much by itself, but could be him thinking something is pulling on his thing and he is bending down, but too little evidence to know if that is the case.

Picture 3 for those who are wondering.
Click to expand...

@Mare Lover 1975 would you have insight?
 
JazzyPaws said:
@Mare Lover 1975 would you have insight?
Click to expand...
From what horse experience I do have, I'm pretty sure it's not going to give the stallion pleasure, so the constriction device really shouldn't be there. I wondered if it might not be a form of chastity, or anti-masturbation device, which are used in some commercial horse studs to prevent the stallion from getting themself off and wasting the businesses profit making liquid. If that is the case I guess it's at least better then a spike ring, those things are evil.
 
HugDoggy said:
From what horse experience I do have, I'm pretty sure it's not going to give the stallion pleasure, so the constriction device really shouldn't be there. I wondered if it might not be a form of chastity, or anti-masturbation device, which are used in some commercial horse studs to prevent the stallion from getting themself off and wasting the businesses profit making liquid. If that is the case I guess it's at least better then a spike ring, those things are evil.
Click to expand...

I just know they've been tagged before on horse stuff
 
Since the user is guested and the one image definitely does not pose a significant loss for the forum, deleted whatever it is or whatever it's purpose is.
 
This 3rd vid in this one just looks wrong to me, pulling a stallions epididymis and slapping testicles is not something that I think should be done, but it can be hard to know how much force is being applied large animals testicle do often have a fare be of mass to them so they aren't going to swing wildly without a good amount of force. So I think the impact is more than a pat. So I'm calling it abusive if for no other reason than the horse didn't like it retracting his penis away.

If others are in agreement, I think this clip should be removed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pes
Ok so I don't know about this one, in this section of the clip I don't think the horse is being hurt and it's not surprising he isn't erect if he's peeing. I just get the vibe that the woman was actually trying to get some other fluid out of him at the time. And clearly he's not thinking super sexy thoughts with what's happening, so not sure which side of the remove fence I'm standing on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pes
HugDoggy said:
Ok so I don't know about this one, in this section of the clip I don't think the horse is being hurt and it's not surprising he isn't erect if he's peeing. I just get the vibe that the woman was actually trying to get some other fluid out of him at the time. And clearly he's not thinking super sexy thoughts with what's happening, so not sure which side of the remove fence I'm standing on.
Click to expand...
All of that aside, it clearly doesn't belong solo animals, so should be removed on that grounds alone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pes
I would just like to ask, aren't fence/owner-hopping videos pre-rule change supposed to be given some leniency? Every time I get a "report resolved" notification for one from 2019/2020 the user is warned or banned. I thought verbal warnings were going to be given for first offenses on old posts (of course all these users may have records I don't know of)
 
gsdmixg said:
I would just like to ask, aren't fence/owner-hopping videos pre-rule change supposed to be given some leniency? Every time I get a "report resolved" notification for one from 2019/2020 the user is warned or banned. I thought verbal warnings were going to be given for first offenses on old posts (of course all these users may have records I don't know of)
Click to expand...
A couple I think I gave a notice, but one that was really sus where someone was on the side of the road getting a lick job and left. I believe he was given a warning. But could be wrong.
 
This will be a long one so bear with me, I usually just report and move on, but in this case, and the multiple instances of abuse shown, it warrants being posted in here. I can also copy/paste my info in here for my eventual report of the clip. Maybe we can get some identifiers for the clips I'm going to specify in this report for future action? For the compilation I mean, anyone else in here should be able to tell an under age animal. We don't need to show them here. One clip I'm going to report does not show the abuse, but a pic from the clip was used as an identifier in a story I read in this thread during a conversation between @FloofyNewfie and @pes I believe. The person who is in the clip is a verified abuser. So the identifiers do indeed help. See report below.

All information pertains to this clip...Post in thread 'ZMV 3 part video series' https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/zmv-3-part-video-series.65417/post-1948790

Timestamps and examples are as follows.
7:32 to 7:39- Man having vaginal sex with a calf.
7:53 to 8:01- Man having oral sex with a calf.
8:12 to 8:24- Yet another clip of a man having vaginal sex with a calf.
10:53 to 10:56- This is the clip I mentioned earlier of a man having sex with a female dog that doesn't show abuse, but was previously used to identify the man in the clip as an abuser earlier in this thread.
12:48 to 12:50- I'll be honest, I'm not 100% sure what's going on here, but I think I know. You'll see.
14:17 to 14:19- Quick shot of a man having sex with a female dog, it's quick but I believe she whines. The human didn't stop.

All of these instances are from part 3 of a compilation video set. The other two videos are posted in the same thread. I have not reviewed them yet, but I will review them later for another report. Unless someone else beats me to it. I would appreciate it.
 
All of these instances are from part 3 of a compilation video set. The other two videos are posted in the same thread. I have not reviewed them yet, but I will review them later for another report. Unless someone else beats me to it. I would appreciate it.
Click to expand...

Nevermind, the thread is gone. Thanks @pes.
 
@Zorge @Oldman (I got a PM from the OP on this)
This thread got deleted with: "Your thread Small dogs was deleted. Reason: Forced shit. Don't post shit like this again."
So in case anyone is clueless on why, here is the explanation:
1. The dog looks emaciated. Skin and bone but that might still be just appearance.
2. 1:05 both legs held in front of the camera, because you can not have a dog move out of the frame when people are paying you on chaturbate, can you. The dog is visibly trying to move.
The woman is sucking him in the known and incorrect way. This continues until the dog finally manages to get away where the video cuts. There is quite a bit of struggling there and leg holding.
3:31 the dog is moved into frame and is visibly stressed and not fine with it. Tense body language through the whole thing. Any chance the dog has, he is moving away.
8:10 the whole sex scene is a guy holding the dog on the woman and simulating humping by moving the whole dog. Several times his hand can be seen.
11:01 the woman is holding his paw to force him to stay on her, the moment he can, he jumps off.
12:00 more holding and simulated humping.

This is what it looks like when you rape a dog that has never seen you in a hotel room.
Looks like a stray dog, not taken good care of either.
Never through the whole video have I seen a single hint of excitement, the dog is apathetic, shut down and does not want to be there.
Let alone the lame, dumb "actress".
 
Just wanted to say that I'm actually really glad to see that this is well enforced here. That there's a standard upheld. Being new here I didn't know what to expect coming in as this is the very first community I've ever joined but I've liked what I've seen thus far and this just makes me feel all the better. Thanks for the work y'all do here.
 
Fart26rus said:
video
Click to expand...

Yes, alisonproductions has after decades of fake cum commercial crap porn learned that when your actress has never seen a live horse, you need to let the horse mount a mare to make him cum. Because your actress can not do anything else than hold the penis and open the mouth. No skill, no knowledge of how to jerk a horse off. Actually in many examples no ability to close the mouth and not let the cum out.
But they have not learned to not bind the legs. They have to make sure the lame actress who does not know nothing about animals is not hurt, they can not afford to have a zoophile with actual relationship with the animal. Which is why their porn is considered animal abuse. As well as against the rules because it is recent commercial content.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top