The abusive porn cleanup project

I have found abusive content in the past:


  • Total voters
    1,524
I’d like a clarification on the rules.

The rules say there’s no human on animal water sports allowed. there are lots of videos where girls are squirting in dog mouths as they are being eaten out. Does that count as water sports, and should I report it? How do I know if it’s pee or female ejaculate? I want to make sure I’m reporting the correct content.
 
I’d like a clarification on the rules.

The rules say there’s no human on animal water sports allowed. there are lots of videos where girls are squirting in dog mouths as they are being eaten out. Does that count as water sports, and should I report it? How do I know if it’s pee or female ejaculate? I want to make sure I’m reporting the correct content.
Personal opinion here, innocent until proven.
I would not count an honestly accidental small squirt of whatever if the dog goes to it.
Anythhing more than that, specially long purpously squirts trying to aim at the dog are clearly off and to be deleted.

In any case, if in doubt, *report*

shesh... I even remember there was a video or two of women squating on a dog held on his back 😓
 
Last edited:
Hi everyone, here's another amateur video, hope you like it, I'm not the best in this but, ty all.
Baited licking.
Consider how reluctantly the dog licks her even with that huge amount of peanut butter. I guess there is a reason for that.
The use of bait to make animals do sexual stuff to you is dishonest and disingenuous. No zoophile would ever do that.
And a year later I get to remove that. Nice.
 
Thanks for the reports.
Well I’ve been reporting porn for quite some time now so I’m pretty sure I’ve already lost it.

Why do I have so much free time
🤦‍♀️
This is not an easy job. :D
You come to the realization of how much more crap people post than what you thought. :D
 
Thanks for the reports.

This is not an easy job. :D
You come to the realization of how much more crap people post than what you thought. :D
I think what gets me is just the sheer stupidity of the comments. Dog being blatantly raped “so hot!”
 
Do not forget that the important part in ZOO PORN is what the human actress looks like.
Honestly sad. I think I’ll do some more reports later today cuz I moved to the male/m dog section for a bit. Needed a break from “slut sucks disgusting dog cock”
 
  • Like
Reactions: pes
Honestly sad. I think I’ll do some more reports later today cuz I moved to the male/m dog section for a bit. Needed a break from “slut sucks disgusting dog cock”
I have been having trouble with tor speeds lately, so reviewing anything large was not an option which prevents me from continuing where I left off. Since I want to go through all the threads one by one and can not skip.
I am on page 87. But mods see deleted threads, so I have no idea how far this is viewed as a regular user. :D
 
I have been having trouble with tor speeds lately, so reviewing anything large was not an option which prevents me from continuing where I left off. Since I want to go through all the threads one by one and can not skip.
I am on page 87. But mods see deleted threads, so I have no idea how far this is viewed as a regular user. :D
I have not been going page by page. I just pick random numbers and posts😅

Just like what I’ve seen. Or put a sad face while I wait for it to be removed. I haven’t touched many longer videos yet, because they take forever to load and I get bored. I will try some.

Currently there are 32 pages. Used to be 35 but I went on reporting spree so less 😅
 
  • Like
Reactions: pes
In the hungry latina video, around the 0.25 mark, I get the impression the dog wants to step away, but the actress holds him by the knot with her hand


I also reported two posts directly, but these already have been deleted, yet I thought I could also post them here so it's clear why I decided to report them:

1.
The way this clip started was already a reason for me to report it. Not only is one of the hindleg raised due to the way the dog is held for the blowjob, but also somebody holds the dog on a lead.

2.
Next compilation video, again the first bit: dog is erect, but on his back (0.13) and the actress holds the hind legs so she can pin herself on the penis. This dildogging goes on until 5.00 and just before the 3 minute mark the dog is licking his lips, so possibly a sign of stress. All of this time, there is no active involvement of the dog. Next clip in the compilation (5.05-5.30) is an attempt to suck a limp penis. Some more limp penis sucking at 6.18, followed by some more dildogging at 6.55 and on to 7.25
 
  • Like
Reactions: pes
This is going to take a while.
If anyone wants to point out specifically the bad clips to spare us downloading all of them over unstable tor, please do so.
:D
Mostly what I'm seeing is on the last few pages, from a user mustang200, mainly on the last page (18). They're pulling from TikTok, primarily from farmers it seems who use elephants in work. A lot of the videos feature the front legs of the elephants chained together. I tried reporting one post earlier but it got rejected for a reason that has nothing to do with that????
1665349996639.png
Here's what the videos feature, some prominently in the thumbnails, particularly 30, 31 and 32.
1665350039467.png
And the reason my report was rejected. Granted I was tired and may have worded it strangely, but I re-reported that particular post
 
Mostly what I'm seeing is on the last few pages, from a user mustang200, mainly on the last page (18). They're pulling from TikTok, primarily from farmers it seems who use elephants in work. A lot of the videos feature the front legs of the elephants chained together. I tried reporting one post earlier but it got rejected for a reason that has nothing to do with that????
View attachment 317879
Here's what the videos feature, some prominently in the thumbnails, particularly 30, 31 and 32.
View attachment 317880
And the reason my report was rejected. Granted I was tired and may have worded it strangely, but I re-reported that particular post
Um.
I see a difference in an owner chaining an animal to take sexual advantage, or video, and someone getting footage from an animal chained by someone else for unrelated purposes.

But sure. While I do not mind on the "science side" of seeing how the hardware works, It is not nice and would surely be an inconvenience if I tried to get myself off on those images.
 
Um.
I see a difference in an owner chaining an animal to take sexual advantage, or video, and someone getting footage from an animal chained by someone else for unrelated purposes.

But sure. While I do not mind on the "science side" of seeing how the hardware works, It is not nice and would surely be an inconvenience if I tried to get myself off on those images.
If you read the rules, under abusive content it says not to post a restrained/hogtied animal. So while it was *someone else* doing the restraining, it's still not allowed on the forum.
 
Back
Top