The abusive porn cleanup project

I have found abusive content in the past:


  • Total voters
    1,524
@Leonschkie Commercial crap. Dog held in place, 0 knowledge of how to suck a dog, fake cumshot at 2:03 complete with "mysterious cut". Forceful shoving of the penis into her mouth before -> No respect for the animal.

Fake thick cumshots with dogs have to be the stupidest thing I have ever seen.
15 likes :D pathetic.
 
Last edited:
@Knottyk9Cock
This piece of shit has been removed for animal abuse more times than I can remember.
00:00 you can see the dog is being held in place.
00:23 the dog is held by his tail.
3:38 second dog held in place and used for dildogging by the other guy.
4:34 the second dog does not even have an erection but is still used as a sex toy.
5:08 dildogging by moving the entire dog.
6:06 both dogs dragged into frame.
7:12 the white dog does not even have an erection again and has his hind leg pinned down.
None of the animals in this piece of commercial crap had any choice and both the dogs were used as sex toys.
Reported again.

Identifier:
07s086.png
 
Last edited:
Could I have your opinion on these?

Post 1 - video 2
It seems to me the woman isn't very much enjoying it, but I might be wrong there.

Post 8
Sitting and humping on the dog while the dog is on his back. It's difficult to see whether the dog has an erection or not, but it's the dog lying on his back that concerns me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pes
Could I have your opinion on these?

Post 1 - video 2
It seems to me the woman isn't very much enjoying it, but I might be wrong there.

Post 8
Sitting and humping on the dog while the dog is on his back. It's difficult to see whether the dog has an erection or not, but it's the dog lying on his back that concerns me.
I have reported some of the clips there.
"Your recent report has been resolved: Post in thread 'Mis videos favoritos (soy de CDMX)' - Whole thread was deleted, user was given first and final warning. Thank you."
 
Brazilian piece of commercial crap.
00:00 it is obvious that the husky is held in frame by a guy.
2:00 mysterious off camera move -> 2:25 fakest, lamest, stupidest fake cumshot.
2:41 second fake cumshot.
Educate yourself about canine semen please. Nobody wants to see this shit.
I know the movie is fake, never did I claim it was real, my post was asking if anyone had another version, it was the same but more close up, my reason is for other than you assume. It was posted not as a joy video but as a video reference so someone can watch it to know what I was trying to locate. Sorry if it gave the wrong idea or wasn't clear. Perhaps if you found out why first you might know why it was asked of others in the first place. Nothing but help finding it for a personal reason was all the motive. Sorry if you thought different. Respectfully, thank you. 👍 Good day. 😉☺️
 
Last edited:
Not so much here but I have seen some bad stuff when hopping from bestiality site to bestiality site. It kills my boner and makes me angry when I see it.
 
Sad to see these. Just a thought, you need to respect the other. To keep and love an animal it's not like owning a pair of jeans, throws it out if bored...
 
The people who voted ''no'' clearly don't understand what we see as abusive. Because I put a lot of question marks at the shit that's uploaded.
Some people don't recognize because it's murky however the clear-cut cases means there are people who has great tolerances as well as desensitization
 
The people who voted ''no'' clearly don't understand what we see as abusive. Because I put a lot of question marks at the shit that's uploaded.
The voting is actually not very accurate. Since it depends on when you hit this thread and if you do that before finding abusive porn here, you vote "no" but likely will not return to change your vote later.
I also regularly observe interesting fighting between the values. That makes me think that some people intentionally vote for no just to mislead the results a bit. :D There is no way of confirming that though. But considering how many people actually completely hate me to the point of discussing my username over other platforms, it would not surprise me. :D I am actually surprised "Yes" is still winning. :D
The more accurate measure of the amount of abusive content is the number of reports you can read in this thread and the fact that in some sections of the forum, you can literally find something worth reporting within 10 minutes including the download time. One such section was the F/M horse porn.
 
The voting is actually not very accurate. Since it depends on when you hit this thread and if you do that before finding abusive porn here, you vote "no" but likely will not return to change your vote later.
I also regularly observe interesting fighting between the values. That makes me think that some people intentionally vote for no just to mislead the results a bit. :D There is no way of confirming that though. But considering how many people actually completely hate me to the point of discussing my username over other platforms, it would not surprise me. :D I am actually surprised "Yes" is still winning. :D
The more accurate measure of the amount of abusive content is the number of reports you can read in this thread and the fact that in some sections of the forum, you can literally find something worth reporting within 10 minutes including the download time. One such section was the F/M horse porn.
Why isn't there a option to change your vote? It should definitely be more flexible then being one answer that's permanent with something as important as this
 
Back
Top