"Outing going badly" is not really something he could do again after stating publicly his name and city on twitter no later than in 2017.my guess is he outted himself and it went badly.. he seemed kinda outspoken.
I have seen him around. For years he has popped into various places and usually doesn't hang around long. It's nothing new.Aluzky actually has an account on here. However he hasn't been seen since August 3rd, 2020. He appeared on the ZooVille Chat for a little while afterwards, but then completely dropped from existence. I really don't know what happened to him? I'm not sure if he got caught, or just went underground entirely. He's definitely a controversial figure in the zoo realm for some of his beliefs, that's for sure.
As for opinions, there's a lot stances that I disagreed with when I used to talk with him, and there were some stances that we agreed upon. One thing I do know is that he seemed to love his own dogs very much and seemed to take really good care of them.
As for videos, I've only seen a handful of them. I'm only interested in female dogs so a lot of his content didn't do much for me. But meh... he pretty much stopped making new videos entirely when the laws about bestiality changed in his home country.
What is IRC?We used to have a guy with similar attitudes back in the IRC days. That might predate this guy, it was a while ago. He used a similar nick but I don't recall exactly what it was. We used to boot him fairly regularly. Aluzky by name was banned from a couple of old forums I used to visit.
I first encountered Aluzky through his YouTube channel 10 years ago. His videos educating the public about zoophilia were ones I admired. But his posts on Twitter, to me, seemed to represent a guy who was self-involved, emotionally unintelligent, and lacking nuance.I used to debate alongside Aluzky against endless hordes of antizoos in the comments of his YouTube channel for entertainment, until I got bored. He was actually the first person I had ever conversed with on the Internet. I am glad his videos debunking antizoo arguments are out on the web, but I understand that many people may not want him representing the community, but I am personally fine with him doing so, as outsiders likely would not punch a zoo that did not fencehop any less harder than one who did.
I have only had a few messages with him for some time, as his channel has become a gaming channel, displaced from defending zoos completely.
If you have been keeping up with the Bestia Amore Podcast, you would hear Wintergreen and Ellie's opinions on him. They talk at length about him during their latest episode, 8, and though they avoid saying his name, anybody who has been in the community for more than a minute knows exactly who they were talking about. What with quoting his IQ of 134, sending pictures of genitalia to minors to teach them, having sex with dogs he nannies, et cetera.
Personally, I am ok with Aluzky, but my opinion is probably irrationally modified or "nostalgia-blinded" by the fact that he was the first prozoo I had ever talked to online. He has an entire witchhunt around him on YouTube and Reddit. He even gave out his address, I think he lives on the island of Malta (correct me if I am wrong), and nobody who threatened him ever did crap, just like when Fausty revealed his address somewhere in Washington.
If you don't know yet - Fausty has passed away by now.I first encountered Aluzky through his YouTube channel 10 years ago. His videos educating the public about zoophilia were ones I admired. But his posts on Twitter, to me, seemed to represent a guy who was self-involved, emotionally unintelligent, and lacking nuance.
It's so coincidental you say you're "nostalgia-blinded" by him, I felt the same way. He was the first zoo I ever observed on YouTube. The Axe commercial, I think, was a humorous and bold criticism of anti-zoos and the public's ignorance about zoophilia back in the golden age of the 1990's. The extent of Aluzky's negative attention at the hands of anti-zoos is peculiar in comparison to how anonymous most zoos are. I would never reveal my address on the Internet, populated by cybercriminals and the like. Fausty revealed his own address? That's a tragedy waiting to happen.
Some zoos have had their lives destroyed because of the malevolent impersonality of individuals and government institutions. Back in the pre-Internet era of the 1980's, one person in particular had their life and marriage almost vanquished due to a reported "accident". But analyzing the sequence of events, it may become evident that they were intentionally targeted by the very government they swore to uphold. I highly respect the power of the federal branch, but when they trample on a citizen's civil liberties, it raises the kind of questions that keep you up at night.
Tiny correction. I'm against crimes. Fence hopping involves CRIMINAL trespassing on some ones property, that is a crime, thus, I don't support fence hopping at all and I have never done fence hopping even that I could have easily done it dozens of times. I don't do crimes, I don't support doing crimes. That is the code of ethics that I live by.For example only valuing the opinion of the animal for having sex with him or her - in which view fence-hopping is ethically right. A view that I share because differing views - though more mainstream - are based on ownership which I ideally don't see as right but sadly as the only way an animal can practically exist in our world.
Curious to know what some of those views are. I've only known Aluzky through some of his videos.
eeeee..... You DO realize what the legal status of bestiality around the world is, right? ...right?Tiny correction. I'm against crimes. Fence hopping involves CRIMINAL trespassing on some ones property, that is a crime, thus, I don't support fence hopping at all and I have never done fence hopping even that I could have easily done it dozens of times. I don't do crimes, I don't support doing crimes. That is the code of ethics that I live by.
As far as I know, fencehopping is having sex with an animal without owner's permission, assuming there is any. That's it.Owner hopping is doing intimate things with animals that are not owned by you, wichout the owner permission, while not doing anything criminal like trespassing or stealing the animal or doing animal cruelty.
That's just plain wrong. Holocaust was perfectly legal when it happened, nazis ensured that.Think about the most disgusting immoral thing you can imagine, but if that thing is not criminal. I will support it.
As far as I know, I have never been banned from any zoophile forums where I have made account. On beastforums I think I was on very good therms with the owner and the mods, they even gave me free unlimited premium account on gaybeast (without me asking) Maybe they like my porn or my line of though? I don't know.We used to have a guy with similar attitudes back in the IRC days. That might predate this guy, it was a while ago. He used a similar nick but I don't recall exactly what it was. We used to boot him fairly regularly. Aluzky by name was banned from a couple of old forums I used to visit.
Well said. I don't think you are wrong. That being said. None of those traits are a hinder to defend zoophilia and human+animal relationships. While some will want to appeal to emotion to convince the zoophobes, I rather appeal to facts. Facts are cold, emotionless and objective, they end up saying the truth, they prove who is right and who is wrong. I have my way to debate, others are free to use a more emotionally rident approach to educate the zoophobes. I welcome anyone else who tries to do zoo-activism.But his posts on Twitter, to me, seemed to represent a guy who was self-involved, emotionally unintelligent, and lacking nuance.
You DO realize what the legal status of bestiality around the world is, right? ...right?
Aluzky actually has an account on here.........but then completely dropped from existence. I really don't know what happened to him? I'm not sure if he got caught, or just went underground entirely.
We seem to speak a completely different languageDo you understand the difference between something being illegal and something being criminal?
Without the trespassing there is no fencehopping.
Fence-hopping does not need to involve actually hopping over a fence or even trespassing – if you have sex with someone’s animal while pet-sitting, that is still considered fence-hopping.
Fencehopping is a criminal act
they too ignorant or stupid or emotional unstable to think and react in a rational way, or they just don't care to understand my arguments because of my zoosexual status.