If zoo wasn't taboo would that take away from the appeal?

If zoo wasn’t taboo I think it would be a lot more openly practiced and talked about. Like maybe a pet’s sexual performance ability will be part of the discussion when buying a pet at the store. Brothels might have a wider species options beyond just humans of various skin colours and ethnicities. Adult stores would have a larger variety of dildo and vibrator shapes on their publicly viewed shelves and the same for cock sleeves and penetrators. Sex Ed would include animal and human interaction and biology might have a more detailed focus on animal reproduction. Maybe even open zoo porn mags on newsagent shelves.
 
Oh gosh, a bit of a mixed bag I guess.

Predominantly, I'd be WAY less anxious and stressed about my interest, and maybe I'd be able to run for local office without this sword of damocles hanging over my head all the time!

But, to a much lesser extent, the fact that it was forbidden and definitely "something I shouldn't be looking at" was part of the appeal at first and made it have a much stronger impression on me. I like to think that it being more socially accepted would result in me still being interested and happy, but you know what they say about the Butterfly Effect.
 
I don't think it would take away from it. But to those who like the taboo aspect may seem more vanilla. Sort of the way many kinks have become as they were more widely accepted in the world and less back room.
 
For me it’s nothing todo with it being taboo, like I assume most people here would wish it wasn’t frowned upon etc…

I can’t really explain, it’s just something so carnal about a woman being taken by a dog that turns me on.
 
Cant say I've ever even thought of it being taboo. I am what I am. No matter what the public feels about the subject. Their opinions mean nothing to me. My influence comes from animals. Not people.
 
For me its not sexual attraction I'm ace, but I'm a people pleaser (and puppy pleaser) and demi, so I would be greatfull to have this normalized and to have friends into this too.
 
If zoophilia were suddenly widely-accepted, that would not magically make all animals ugly. Big cats, wolves, et cetera would still be as hot as ever to me. Animals are sexually appealing in their own rite, regardless of what society says about them.

I was first attracted to animals when I was young; long before I knew or cared what the general view on zoos was.
 
Not at all. I personally don’t believe it’s part of the equation for most. Although there are those that do get
Spun up by risky sex
 
CarolinaHorseGirl said:
Oh gosh, a bit of a mixed bag I guess.

Predominantly, I'd be WAY less anxious and stressed about my interest, and maybe I'd be able to run for local office without this sword of damocles hanging over my head all the time!

But, to a much lesser extent, the fact that it was forbidden and definitely "something I shouldn't be looking at" was part of the appeal at first and made it have a much stronger impression on me. I like to think that it being more socially accepted would result in me still being interested and happy, but you know what they say about the Butterfly Effect.
Click to expand...
No, I don't know what they say about the butterfly effect.

And no, it wouldn't make a difference to me either way. I still wouldn't talk about it either.
 
Cream said:
I'm new here and would like to get to know some of you wonderful people!

I'd like your guys opinion on the title question. If beastiality wasn't considered taboo would you personally be as into it?

I would, I might be even more into it. if I saw people in my life that i wouldn't expect participating.. I'd be very turned on.
Click to expand...
Would not change anything for me
 
KerriAnn9 said:
No because it's the act, the sex, not the taboo that's the appeal. Granted, mental stimulation can play a part if you want (ohh I'm having sex with a dog for example) but, for me, it's the act and connection. No different than if with a human
Click to expand...
I think I fall sorta in the middle of this. No experience, but with the appeal of it and for women active in it. It's not that it's taboo in my mind turning me on, it's the intense pleasure they've told me about over the years, that I've seen in videos, and hope to still see in person one day (maybe experience). Some women may masturbate with their fingers only, some may sit on a sybian until they can't remember who they are! Both are hot, different intensities and pleasure, and both a turn on to me (who doesn't love seeing a woman experiencing an O?). I don't see the pleasure received from an animal as being taboo, just a different way and level of pleasure, like a sybian, so the appeal I think would always be in my mind if they are enjoying themselves, whether taboo or (k)not! Not being an owner, I can't comment on the connection during, that I can only assume is more personal to each.
 
When I was starting out (in my teens) it was the rush of it being taboo. I was in a zoo-frenzy. Which in my adolescents was wrong and stupid. As a young adult my views and feeling changed as I matured it was not about the sex it was about the connection, warmth and love I had for my furry partner. No now the fact that it is “taboo” does not matter.
 
Not a bit for me, quite the opposite, it would be even more great with half of the fetishists hopefully gone becuase it would not be "dirty enough" to be a taboo. As an sexual orientation and not a fetish, it would just bloom :) What a nice fantasy, imagine how this forum might look! :D
 
Not one bit. I'm a zoo because I legit just love animals. Has been the prominent characterist of my sexuality since it began, before I knew what laws were or cared about social norms.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top