Can people with no experience really be called Zoo?

S

SarahNL

Guest
This question has been going through my mind for a few days now.
I spoke to many people since I've joined this forum and I really wonder.
At least 90% or more here just have fantasies without actual experience.
I wonder how many would actually like it when their fantasies become reality.
How many would regret it and wish they never tried.
Often I hear talks and stories that just sound as if it will be a fantasy forever.
Shouldn't it make more sense if someone that actually had or has experience be able to judge better whether they are Zoo or not.
I also see a furry section, which I personally don't see as Zoophilia or Bestiality at all.
To me, that's a totally different genre, or am I wrong?

Don't feel offended by my thoughts, I am new and just have countless questions.
 
I am happy to share a bit about my experience because it goes along with what you're asking.

I have always had an attraction to animals since i was young, it became very strong during puberty and never went away after that. I hated myselof for it and tried to ignore it and bury it all the way into adulthood. Ive never done anything sexual with a dog yet aside from letting my dog lick my face, mouth, arms etc. Never my dick or ass. But i know i crave a romantic connection with a dog, not just the dog itself. I want to feel a connection, its not just about sex and being horny. I also am a furry and find a lot of the porn very hot and while it is different, there are aspects in that community that fall under zoo type content as well. But being a furry and zoo i personally feel are different, but i am both.

While i may not have had a sexual experience yet, i would like to one day have one. I just cannot see myself having sex with an animal, i have too much health anxiety. When you stated the regret part... that happens with humans too! Some people are curious about their sexuality and they regret trying stuff with the gender they did. You may realize animals aren't for you after trying it, yes you may regret it and it make help you come to the realization that you don't have this fetish, or are a full on zoophile... but maybe you will enjoy it and be happy to have had the experience.

While some may fantasize and never actually act upon it, the romantic/sexual attraction is there so i would say they may have a fetish or be a zoophile. Sexuality is a spectrum

Just my personal opinion
 
Sexuality IS a spectrum. And often there are spectrums withing that spectrum. A Zoo is a zoo if he or she puts animal welfare, partner or not, on a higher level than the mundane average.

Since most people, across the board, treat their lovers somewhat better than other people of their acquaintance, I dont give extra points to the experienced. In other words all zoos are equal.

But not everyone who claims to be a zoo is. As a group we have extended acceptance to many folks who are more voyeur than zoo.

If the only claim to zooishness is liking Vixen, or Cupcake, or Andy Wolf, or its a fur suit that cost you an arm and a leg( but still plays to fantasy and not reality), I have a hard time thinking of that as Zoo. Same as I have a hard time with the concept that exclusives are better than anyone else who claims the Name. As far as acceptance is concerned, we are all human. The Mundanes may not think so, but thats their cross to bear. It's a religious objection, and little else, that causes them to march. But we are all human.

The open arms of the Earlies was an attempt to normalize what isn't normal. Strength in numbers is fine when you actually have numbers, but we do not, and never did. That is not going to change in this century. At this stage we'd be best served by accepting that which we cannot change, and get on with our own lives. If that means keeping it in the closet, at least the critters we love are safe.
 
This is a tough question. On one hand I would say yes, it is possible. However, I think it is highly unlikely for the vast majority of people. On the other hand, I would say no because most zoophiles will go to great lengths to find and care for a lover of their own.
 
can *insert any sexuality* claim it's their sexuality? of course they can, if the attraction is there... a virgin hetero/homosexual doesn't stop being one because they didn't have sex yet, do they?

feels like this place being mostly riddled with ppl who are not even attracted to animals, but to seeing a woman getting drilled by one is an entirely different question.
 
If the question had been about "zoosexual" or "zoophile" rather than "zoo", then it might have been different.

Suppose we substitute "zoo" with "straight" or "gay" and ask the question again: can anybody with no experience call themselves "straight" or gay"? Most likely, there wouldn't be any doubt about it because people experience a certain attraction to other people or to animals, even if these are mythical or extinct animal species. So yes, you can call yourself "zoo" even without the experience, simply because the attraction is there. Limiting the labelling of "zoo" to the question whether a person has been sexually involved or not actually impoverishes the label because it dismisses the romantic attraction people can harbour, whether they act on it or not.
 
nekdoneco123 said:
feels like this place being mostly riddled with ppl who are not even attracted to animals, but to seeing a woman getting drilled by one is an entirely different question.
Click to expand...
I'm guilty of this and am glad women enjoy it so much. I'm a little jealous actually as a man...I'd love to be a woman and get drilled by a big ol' doggo.
 
SarahNL said:
This question has been going through my mind for a few days now.
I spoke to many people since I've joined this forum and I really wonder.
At least 90% or more here just have fantasies without actual experience.
I wonder how many would actually like it when their fantasies become reality.
How many would regret it and wish they never tried.
Often I hear talks and stories that just sound as if it will be a fantasy forever.
Shouldn't it make more sense if someone that actually had or has experience be able to judge better whether they are Zoo or not.
I also see a furry section, which I personally don't see as Zoophilia or Bestiality at all.
To me, that's a totally different genre, or am I wrong?

Don't feel offended by my thoughts, I am new and just have countless questions.
Click to expand...
I mean, the other term is zoosexual, not zoopractical. So, i would argue that yea? You can still have an interest in zoo stuff and not necessarily have experience no?
 
I’m not sure how fair it is to try and push people further into, or farther outside of whichever box you think they may need to fit in. As some have pointed out, being zoo is hardly a popular position, so those who claim to be one probably do have genuine feelings for animals.

However, with that said, I do also feel that there are a lot of folks on the internet who may pretend to be something their not in an effort to doxx people or to raise general hell in our circles. Those are clearly not true zoos, which is why we should always be diligent.
 
LuvelyLeda said:
It would probably depend on why someone has a certain fantasy. If the fantasy comes from stuff seen in porn, that might be all there is to it. If the fantasy comes from attraction, and the fantasy is always the kind of sex someone is thinking about having, then it's probably really likely that they'll like the real thing... as long as they don't feel guilty about it after.


Can you be straight or gay without any experiences? Same thing.


You should check out some of the threads about what sex feels like for male zoos and female dogs. It sounds like they enjoy it just as much (if not more) than we do. I think it's easier for them too, like for example, if it's between a guy a female dog, the guy doesn't have to worry about nails. I have to be really diligent with my partner's nails to make sure I don't get scratched up. I know some people like the scratches, but I don't.
Click to expand...
Hmm, I feel like the after cum zoomies and excitement bitches have after they get off could have a bit of that danger with the nails also though, lol. I’ve seen some female dogs absolutely LOSE THEIR MINDS when they cum, so there’s some truth to this, I feel.
 
SarahNL said:
This question has been going through my mind for a few days now.
I spoke to many people since I've joined this forum and I really wonder.
At least 90% or more here just have fantasies without actual experience.
I wonder how many would actually like it when their fantasies become reality.
How many would regret it and wish they never tried.
Often I hear talks and stories that just sound as if it will be a fantasy forever.
Shouldn't it make more sense if someone that actually had or has experience be able to judge better whether they are Zoo or not.
I also see a furry section, which I personally don't see as Zoophilia or Bestiality at all.
To me, that's a totally different genre, or am I wrong?

Don't feel offended by my thoughts, I am new and just have countless questions.
Click to expand...
true. do furries rub you the wrong way? : )
 
LuvelyLeda said:
Call me out if I'm being ignorant, but it can't be that hard to avoid tho, could it?
Click to expand...
Most folks are naked when they’re having sex. I usually am. A flailing bitch in heat in the throes of a soul shaking orgasm can be just as dangerous with the nails as a male going for a hole, in some cases, in my opinion. 🤷‍♂️

Though to be fair, I’m sure that ladies get it worse overall. I was simply pointing out that having sex with dogs inherently comes with the risk of being scratched by their nails. 😀
 
Last edited:
LuvelyLeda said:
I wouldn't say it's dangerous, but scratches are just unavoidable if you don't take care of his nails cuz of how he'll pull himself to you by grabbing your waist, thigh, and tummy area. I can't really imagine what flailing for a female dog looks like in doggy position, but I guess I wouldn't know what I'm talking about. lol 😅
Click to expand...
Doggy style is not the only position for men to have sex with bitches. I was thinking more missionary. There are many ways to have sex, as I’m sure you know very well! 😀

Some positions pose more threat of nail damage than others, male or female. That’s the only point I was making here. But no, I also don’t give a fuck about being scratched by nails from time to time, because that’s part of the whole dog experience.
 
LuvelyLeda said:
That's true...


Does it happen to you often? I like feeling his nails a little, but I don't like being scratched so hard that it leaves a mark or draws a little blood. I go swimming in the summer a lot, and I don't wanna look scratched up in public like I've just experienced domestic abuse or something. Even with nobody else to see them, I'd rather not look like that.
Click to expand...
No, it really doesn’t, but it is possible. I will grant you that it seems it is far more probable for a female human on the receiving end of a canine to be more “battered” in appearance after sex, but it is possible both ways.

We clearly differ considerably as people, as I do not undertake the same activities as you do, and so I don’t really concern myself as to where my dog may scratch me on accident. Keeping her nails shorter helps a lot, but shit happens. I also work in an environment where my body is consistently taking damage, so a couple of sex scratches probably don’t stand out.
 
I believe "true zoos" are those who go beyond sex with animals and treat them as their real life partners.
Then there is an big majority who just seeks the expierence and wants to have sex with animals.
Afterwards come the people who masturbate on zoo-porn and fantasize about it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top