Are you a zoo or a bestialist?

Are you a zoo or a bestialist?


  • Total voters
    757
I voted other. Both, neither, one or the other. I hate labels.

I guess both leaning more towards zoo if I have to go by your rules.

I have deep emotional feelings for all my "pets"(though currently I'm alone) Some I also have sexual feelings for and made out with.

But if I'd meet someone with dogs or horse and (s)he was open for it, and the animal was willing I would let them also mount me without a deeper connection other then lust.
 
Zoo here. My doggy girl is my mate, I call her my wife. Her and my boy mean everything to me. Even if sex is out of the question my love for them will remain the same forever.
 
I've only been attracted to male dogs I've owned, although I've always fantasized about women with animals (most tigers and dogs from an early age - before I even was interested in girls). My First dog was a beautiful 95lb. Black lab/Husky mix - I truly loved both my dogs.

Anyways, at some point, I got into sucking his cock and then started letting him fuck me in the ass when I was about 16 or 17. I got another one much like him after he passed in my early 20's. I've been into dog/girl porn ever since, but felt a special bond between myself and those boys. I feel there has to be some kind of attraction or connection between myself and an animal if we're gonna have sex. It's much the same in my relationships with women (though I doubt many women would understand my perspective/feelings on my sexuality) I really enjoy sex so much more when it's with someone I actually care about on an emotional level. So I claim zoo status rather than bestialist.
 
It’s something in between for me. I agree with Perrokin, I would have sex with basically any willing animal of appropriate size and biology but there’s another component for me that’s kind of in between. Like I don’t think I would ever restrict myself to one mate, but I’ve always had affection for the animals and cared about them more than a simple fling. Plus the term “bestialist” has some serious negative connotations for me as someone who just uses animals for sex and doesn’t really care about their well-being. I know that’s not the technical definition but still it doesn’t sit right with me.
 
I set mine to other but in reality I'm more both. I love my dog above everything and he loves me back, but I would also like to try other animals.
That's also my stance on humans, I might love someone but if I were to be in a relationship it would be a sexually open one.
Amen.
 
I'm not sure, I would say I'm more of a Bestialist, but I haven't been with an animal yet. I would feel love towards them, but I don't know about romantic feelings. Though I guess that could change after being intimate?
 
I'm not sure, I would say I'm more of a Bestialist, but I haven't been with an animal yet. I would feel love towards them, but I don't know about romantic feelings. Though I guess that could change after being intimate?
Once you had intercourse usually you will feel some connection. But its best to bond beforehand if possible
 
I have a strong bonding to my dog, but it isn't really a romantic one and not the same it would be with humans.. and i don't need a strong bond to an animal for wanting to have sex with it.. so i guess i'm more of a Bestialist
 
I don't really like those drawers...

Comparing zoophilia (love) with bestiality (a sexual act) is like comparing a relationship to a kink.

I would tend to say I am both zoophile and zoosexual. If being a bestialist is really defined as not feeling anything for the animal I am fucking, then I definitely do not fall into that category. But then you should have asked about zoophile vs. zoosadist, because imo it's only a small step from not caring about what the animal feels to actually abusing them.
 
Implying that bestialist don't have feelings for their animals is a bit much.
Zoophilia vs bestiality is more like relationshop vs hookup.
 
It’s breeding for me. My animals have always been well taken care of. They are never in need of anything and I won’t have one if I can’t them well entertained and stimulated (non-sexually), but the act of sex is purely just that, sex.
 
Implying that bestialist don't have feelings for their animals is a bit much.
Zoophilia vs bestiality is more like relationshop vs hookup.

this seems like a pretty unpopular opinion, but i admit i tend to agree. there are ... "complications" ... when the animal isn't one in your care, however.
 
This is my first day on this site. I have been enjoying exploring the various sections. I have been trying to be discreet and restrained in what I've been saying thus far. However, I'd like to say a few things about myself regarding my sexuality and my interest in bestiality. I am a very sexually active gay man who engages in some of the nastier types of gay sex. I guess I would describe myself as being versatile because I always like to accommodate whomever I am playing with, but I prefer being fucked (bottoming), rather than topping. I always fuck bareback, whether topping or bottoming. I was careful thirty years ago when I was young. Now I emphasize enjoying life while I'm still living. I love sucking and being sucked and have tremendous stamina avoiding cumming before I want to. I adore sucking a guy to completion, culminating in receiving a facial, something I did as recently as last week. I love the taste of cum and greedily lick up every bit. I have lots of guys who I play with regularly, while I also meet new guys online or in bathhouses or sex parties almost every week. It is common for me to be involved in threesomes or foursomes. I am slutty and proud of it. I love rimming and being rimmed (clean asshole). I love fisting and being fisted (again, clean asshole) and I'm actually quite a good fister with various friends constantly begging me to fist them. I also love piss play. I have been interested in getting fucked by a dog since a guy I was playing with right before the pandemic started confided to me that he had been fucked by a dog and loved it. He described what it was like being knotted, something I had never heard of. Immediately prior to our conversation, lying naked together after sex, I would have thought of beastiality in a very negative way. However hearing this hot guy tell me about his experience created a desire for me to look at beastiality porn (usually with women because there is very little such porn involving guys). Until today I had made very little progress finding any tangible way to hook up with people that are involved with this. I want to suck dog cock, get wildly fucked, and knotted by a dog. I'd also love to suck horse cock too. I'd love to run my tongue all over the huge head of the horse's cock and lick up and swallow the fluid from a horse cock. I really don't have any desire to "top" any animals or have them licking me. I don't approach this with the idea that I have affection for animals I want to have sex with. Consequently, I'm a bestialist, not a zoo. I'm hoping to make new friends quickly. I'm anxious to get naked with a dog or dogs, as well as a horse or two. I'm hoping to meet people that have experience handling animals they own who can provide me with my first experience. From what I've read, I guess we have to be careful posting photos or videos of ourselves engaged in this type of thing. I love making and posting explicit amateur gay porn on various websites. I'd love to have a camera running the first time I do it, but I'm willing to be sensible and defer to other people, who are more knowledgeable and refrain from posting it without understanding the risks and following common sense advice. I've got videos from my first experience with piss play, as well as getting fisted, so I'd love such a video memento from my first experience with beastiality. Hope to hear from you, whether you live nearby or just want to be friendly!
 
I love my pets; they're my best friends. I love them more than nearly all people Ive ever met. However, Im not in love with them. I don't think I would ever be romantically involved with any animal. I just wanna be their slut and please them. Strictly a friends with benefits relationship.
 
I voted bestialist, I guess

of course I don't NOT love animals, but I don't love them that way, just like I don't love every dude that turns me on lol. I just like some doggy dick from time to time x3
 
Still a zoo here. Animal life always astounds me.

Although would love more physical experiences. But I'm perfectly happy with the social interactions.
 
I'm mainly into the bestiality side of things, but I can admit I do sometimes feel that I could have a relationship with an animal. Not being rude or anything, but I feel like I'd feel like I've hit a new low or something. I'd rather be with humans like everyone intends, I hate being a disappointment, but I guess that's how it's turning out. (I hope no one is offended by this, I don't have anything against zoophiles because I understand completely.)
 
I should need a multiple option...
Absolutely zoo with the ones with me, be there sex or not. Just life is not the sane without any of them.

But... I can be called bestialist in that I am sexually curious in certain species/ individuals I am not really willing to be involved.
Even with that, I do need a minimum "relation" or "short knowledge" with my sex "object" be it human or animal. No "express sex" for me, I just do not work that way.
 
I love my dog but I don't have any romantic feelings for him or pretend that he has any for me. I date men.

The only thing that seperates me from your average helicopter dog Mom is that I often cooperate when he tries to hump me. Giving him pleasure gives me pleasure.

I still call myself Zooey even if it doesn't fit your definitions because it sounds cuter and less deviant 😂
 
Definitely a zoo. Something about having sexual feelings towards someone you don't love feels wrong to me.
 
Back
Top