The first clip here looks like Veronica Silesto, but even if it is not, it is proving that commercial porn still has not learned how to handle a dog's penis.
The abusive porn cleanup project
- Thread starter pes
- Start date
-
- Tags
- abuse animal porn clean report
25 likes, several praising comments.
1st video: This is not how you suck a dog and definitely not what you do when the dog wants to get up. Several times through the video the dog is held down or prevented from getting up. For example at 0:15 and 1:04.
She is sucking him like a human demonstrating her nonexistent knowledge of how a dog's penis works or how to pleasure a canine.
Reported for animal abuse. Read the rules.
3rd video: Classic commercial crap porn. Dog held by two people on his side. The way the dog is breathing without any erection suggests stress. 0 knowledge of how to jerk off a dog. 0:40 sucking a limp penis. Anyone who knows how to masturbate a dog would have gotten that dog fully erect in literally seconds. 1:11 you can see someone holding the dog down and mobilizing his front paws. 2:53 the dog can be seen held by his collar (which is a choker) while the actress tries to do something you might call masturbation. But she does not have any idea how to do it. 4:03 completely wrong way of jerking a dog which is known to be uncomfortable. It is obvious that the whole time the dog is held in place by the other guy. The rubbing clearly makes the dog upset as you can see him stepping aside. That is called animal rape.
Reported for animal abuse.
5th video: Same author as 3. She again has no idea how to jerk a dog off. 0:48 dog held by his head on the left. 2:09 the dog is pulled aside by his tail. It is obvious that the whole time the dog is held in place by the other guy. Dildogging by moving the entire dog at the end.
Reported for animal abuse.
No zoophile ever would even remotely treat their dog in this way. Only those who literally do not care for what the animal feels would do that. That is commercial crap porn.
7:31, 8:34, 8:42 the guy is holding the dog's hind leg down. Overall there are several other instances of the guy holding the dog in one place. It is a typical problem of having a customer you are obliged to satisfy. Normally a zoophile would not hold their dog down to have sex. You would wait a few minutes for the dog to calm down a little.
Obviously none of those two people thought holding an animal down for sexual purposes is a bad idea. None of those two are zoophiles. 9:35 dildogging by moving the entire dog.
And by the way the only sexy being in the video is the dog.
@Oldman Another team russia video. Since the previous one was removed, I guess they are not allowed. Is that correct?
Thanks. Is this written in the rules? I do not see it there.
This is confusing. Commercial porn gets posted almost daily. It is very simple to distinguish from amateur content just by the way it is shot. How come that is not removed?
Reposting commercial content is mentioned in the rules. However a rule targeting Team Russia in particular does not exist. Although I probably should add them to the list even though "etc." should cover it.
As it stands, this is how the rule is listed...
COMMERCIAL CONTENT:
DO NOT REPOST content you do not have permission to post from the original author. This includes content from commercial producers such as ZooSkool / Art Of Zoo, Seamless, Mr. Unimportant, etc.
Abandoned content older than 2008 (Zooskool, Petlust, etc.) is okay to post.
Please add the appropriate tags.
However, some of the lower tier productions maybe overlooked just due to their obscurity. It's a bit of a messy situation sometimes, I'll put it like that.
By the way to anyone who reviews porn. This is a powerful tool for removing commercial crap porn from the forum. And it works even on posts where the porn is linked from another porn site as long as you can tell whether it fits into the commercial category as I just tested.
CanisLupus
Citizen of Zooville
I agree, however most of the anal-related porn with dogs I have ever seen was abusive - the dogs were forced to do it or they just "tolerated" it.
CanisLupus
Citizen of Zooville
This is so bad. That woman has no idea how to suck a dog at all. The whole playing with the balls does entirely nothing for the dog sexually and is completely unnecessary. Then the way she sucks the penis is entirely wrong which is also apparent from the complete lack of any erection.
I do not know what she is spitting out there, but it is not cum and there is no need to spit out anything when you are sucking a dog. Which tells me she is not a zoophile at all. The whole way she is touching the penis makes it clear that she thinks it is disgusting. The dog gets uncomfortable with this position because this is not the way dogs have sex obviously.
When you need three people to help keep the dog on his side, there is something wrong in what you are doing.
What follows then is basically just "taking advantage of the penis bone" as she uses the totally limp penis to dildog him.
The first time the dog gets excited is at about 8:26 which unsurprisingly is when they allow him to do it the normal way.
I do not know what she is spitting out there, but it is not cum and there is no need to spit out anything when you are sucking a dog. Which tells me she is not a zoophile at all. The whole way she is touching the penis makes it clear that she thinks it is disgusting. The dog gets uncomfortable with this position because this is not the way dogs have sex obviously.
When you need three people to help keep the dog on his side, there is something wrong in what you are doing.
What follows then is basically just "taking advantage of the penis bone" as she uses the totally limp penis to dildog him.
The first time the dog gets excited is at about 8:26 which unsurprisingly is when they allow him to do it the normal way.
But a lot of it at least with horses uses fake cum and bad handling which means it is reportable and usually removed especially if one of the horse people here support the report with more detailed explanations.
There is a group on the zooville matrix server called something like "uncensored anal". I suspect it will be full of abusive content simply based on the fact that the owner must have had some reason to put "uncensored" into the title/description. I have no had enough courage to go there yet though.
This does not look right to me. First the short leash around her neck is wrong. You should not need anything like that. Second I do not like the way the guy is handling her, holding her feet and especially at 3:04 that does not look like someone who loves animals. 3:12 is an indisputable proof of abuse. What follows after that is clear rape.
@toto123
Can you please tell me why you posted this piece of shit here? From a website that is banned on here? How did you manage to not see the abusive ending of the video?
nekdoneco123
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
if you can even call a piece of string/cable a leash...
Here you have a bunch of fetishist drooling over a video of someone who made a mistake and almost lost her dog.
The thread includes her face, real name and tiktok handle.
Absolutely no respect for her privacy, safety or the safety of her current or future animals.
The thread includes her face, real name and tiktok handle.
Absolutely no respect for her privacy, safety or the safety of her current or future animals.
Stormurhryssa
Citizen of Zooville
Probably not. I guess the thread just is removed. I did not get any notification from the mod, so I do not even know whether any warnings were issued. But from experience it is either none or just the author might have been warned.
I doubt that will happen.
They did get a warning, a first and final regarding doxing. He did explain why he posted, and the fact that the person did indeed express their desire through that social media, however, I have not seen that video as i will not create an account there. I am very convinced that this person will not be posting any social media form anyone ever again. He learned his lesson, if not, it will be a ban.
On a side note, had it been anyone else, it would have been an immediate ban, but this person has proven himself to he rather level headed according to his post history (at least as far as i got, lol)
Other side note: it should have notified you that I did give them a warning as i selected the correct box and typed a "deleted and warned" reason.
All of them? Every single user that liked the post or commented under it?
Every user that likes an abusive video for example (dozens of likes usually) gets a warning when it is removed?
The video was an apology of someone who accidentally shared a zoo recording of themselves, got into trouble with the police and thankfully did not loose their dog. The woman was sad and scared. It was not porn and in fact she never meant to make zoo porn. It contained her personal information and the discussion bellow already had posts of people finding out her full name and other accounts and stalking her. This is not acceptable behavior in my opinion.
I do not see how that is expressing her desire to be a zoo or whatever.
The notification system seems to be a bit broken right now. The last report notification I have is from "Tik tok girl loves her horses" which is a different thread. But thanks for trying, it makes it easier for me to evaluate which reports are useful.
Good to know. Thanks.
Can we get some of the horse people to analyze this video and report it with explanation if you find reportable content.
It is a tough one. It is obviously commercial crap, it has fake cum and some other bad things, but I think it needs better debunking to make the report convincing. You can skip the first 7 minutes.
In my opinion:
This is basically horse orgasm denial and a guide on how to sexually frustrate a stallion to oblivion. Any time the horse attempts to hump, he is stopped and he has a mare in front of him to keep him horny.
That is pretty bad to be honest. Obviously they need a mare since the lame actress has no idea what to do and the horse does not want anything to do with her. Finished off with the usual shove an almost limp dick in an orifice and moan. Both horses are bound in place on top of that. Ended with a fake cumshot at 30:06.
Notice that nowhere before this "cumshots" was there any humping, flare or proper sexual excitement. And there is an mysterious cut right before the "cum" comes out.
Thanks.
It is a tough one. It is obviously commercial crap, it has fake cum and some other bad things, but I think it needs better debunking to make the report convincing. You can skip the first 7 minutes.
In my opinion:
This is basically horse orgasm denial and a guide on how to sexually frustrate a stallion to oblivion. Any time the horse attempts to hump, he is stopped and he has a mare in front of him to keep him horny.
That is pretty bad to be honest. Obviously they need a mare since the lame actress has no idea what to do and the horse does not want anything to do with her. Finished off with the usual shove an almost limp dick in an orifice and moan. Both horses are bound in place on top of that. Ended with a fake cumshot at 30:06.
Notice that nowhere before this "cumshots" was there any humping, flare or proper sexual excitement. And there is an mysterious cut right before the "cum" comes out.
Thanks.
A lot is wrong about this video. First and foremost you do no need to rape a dog to have sex with him.
The guy basically holds him in place the whole time of the "sucking", attempts to prevent any kind of movement and does not even know how to jerk him while the woman desperately tries to suck on his limp penis. The dog does not seem to be happy about it and tries to leave several times until the finally give up.
The guy basically holds him in place the whole time of the "sucking", attempts to prevent any kind of movement and does not even know how to jerk him while the woman desperately tries to suck on his limp penis. The dog does not seem to be happy about it and tries to leave several times until the finally give up.
Reconscope
Supreme Citizen of ZV
YanchaOkami
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
That even reads like abuse without further analysis. ?
Why to upload such media?
Ignorance seems a blessing for lots of masturbating people I assume.
Why to upload such media?
Ignorance seems a blessing for lots of masturbating people I assume.