lunchladylove
Tourist
I really appreciate all the hard work you’re doing here!
Hi,... you're sure treating them as an e-mail conversation with your "Hello," and "Kind regards".
This habit of yours, to state an opinion of yours as if it's a fact, is disingenuous and frankly, insulting everyone's intelligence.once again, you confirm that
At some point I have to wonder whether you're actually just trolling here. You can't be that oblivious.you are not really familiar with internet forums and the etiquette and manners that are customary there. Your quote from me in your last post proves this impressively.
Lol, no. That's far from the standard.Forums etiquette includes greeting and saying goodbye in posts.
Then those are rules specific to THAT forum. That's nowhere close to being universal.There are forums where it is pointed out during registration that a certain level of politeness in the form of greetings and farewells must be observed.
No, it can come off as if you're talking down to someone. A superiority complex. Read the room.But even if this is not mentioned, too much politeness is always better than too little.
Pot calling the kettle black.As another user has already pointed out, you are trying to twist other people's words.
You're the one barging into this with a fucked up definition of what a forum is.I might add that you are trying to conceal your refutation by claiming, without evidence, that I am wrong or simply trying to distract.
Another blanket statement that can easily be proven wrong. There are so many communication platforms, even today, heck ESPECIALLY today, that deliberately do not store communication history.The fact is that post archiving has always been a part of communication platforms.
You need to be more careful and deliberate with your terminology, because it's way too easy to poke holes in your logic.You don't want to admit this in order to justify your original post about deleting posts. But that doesn't change the actual facts.
Flµff, please tell me this was deliberate xDcorrect ponctuation
It always depends on the context.
chat-like character
Ouch.Flµff, please tell me this was deliberate xD
A bulletin board is essentially the same as a forum. Both terms refer to an online platform where users can engage in discussions and exchange information. They are often used interchangeably, although “bulletin board” is historically the older term and tends to refer to a simple, text-based form of online communication, while “forum” sounds more modern and is often associated with additional features and a more structured user interface.Hello,
that misses the point. Bulletin board systems were not forums, but their precursors. And they did not use global access like the Internet, but point-to-point access via telephone modems. They only had a local network structure, in contrast to the global networked platform of the Internet. But even there, long-term archiving already existed, albeit in a limited form. Perhaps the most important BBS was CBBS in 1978, but it was a forerunner, not an Internet forum in the strict sense.
Conclusion: BBSs were not Internet forums, but they fulfilled many of the social and functional roles that forums later took on on the Internet. So they are ancestors, but not equivalent counterparts.
The Planet Forum was, strictly speaking, a computer conference system or community system. It was network-based, but did not use the Internet, instead using decentralised academic networks.
EIES was a non-public computer conference system that ran on distributed networks and is considered another precursor to Internet forums.
Usenet was conceived in 1979, but did not actually launch until 1980.
Regarding the core question at hand, all of these precursors, like modern Internet forums, also had an archiving function. The conclusion is that there has never been an Internet forum without an archiving function; this has been an important basic function from the very beginning.
Kind regards
CdB
Oh my god, there are cavemen in that pussy.
Forum etiquette: If you reply to someone, actually @tag them: @CdB, or reply to their posts so they get an actual notification.Hi Bloit,
As I said before, you need to be more careful with what you say.first of all, I'm sorry. Regarding the reversal of words, I confused you with darkwolf in the quote. He was referring to dogluver101 when he mentioned the deliberate misinterpretation of his words. I apologise.
And easily proven wrong.However, you are mistaken about what I reported about the various forums and precursors; those were not opinions. As is my custom, such statements are always carefully researched and verifiable.
This is not a competition of how many forums we used. Who the hell is even keeping track?As for the standard of polite phrases in forums, I am used to this from a good 200 forums, even today. How many forums did your statement about the standard refer to?
Again, read the room.If you find polite forms of address ‘condescending’, you should perhaps recalibrate your radar. Such polite forms of address are part of mutual respect and normal forms of communication – and you can't go wrong with them among strangers.
Dude, no. What you call "archiving" was a means to an end, with the end goal being to facilitate communication.Yes, the primary task of forums has always been archiving. That is precisely what makes forums special, due to asynchronous communication. If the posts were not archived, no communication would be possible. Even if a post is only archived for one day in order to receive a reply, this is still archiving. In forums with few visitors, posts are often archived for much longer before a reply is received. And most forum operators know that even old topics will always find readers.
YOU switched over to "Communication platforms", because YOU were sloppy with your choice of words.So far, we have only talked about forums. If you want to extend this to communication platforms, no problem.
Yet YOU claim that that's a forum's PRIMARY FUNCTION, which it isn't.The archiving issue can be dealt with quickly. No one has ever claimed that every one of these platforms archives posts.
You're hilarious.You can twist and turn it any way you want, but you can't escape the trap you've set for yourself. At the moment, it doesn't look like you're going to succeed in finding holes in my logic.
Probably some old as fuck forums where they were still figuring out the difference between a forum post, an email, and a handwritten letter sealed with wax and a signet ring.What forums has this dude been a part of?
View attachment 695240
Hey, don't knock it till ya tried it! Fun imagining their faces when they receive it! 50/50 bees wax n candle wax worked the best!Probably some old as fuck forums where they were still figuring out the difference between a forum post, an email, and a handwritten letter sealed with wax and a signet ring.
Even more fun to see if they can decypher my handwritingHey, don't knock it till ya tried it! Fun imagining their faces when they receive it! 50/50 bees wax n candle wax worked the best!
people tell me I was meant to be a doctor, as I scribble in engineerEven more fun to see if they can decypher my handwriting![]()
Even more fun to see if they can decypher my handwriting![]()
Just thought I would point out........none of the rest of us cares. We're fucking BORED reading this love fest, take it to DMs for chrissakes.Hi Boit,
you keep talking about being ‘proven wrong’ and that archiving is not a core function of forums. But you are just repeating disproved arguments instead of finally providing verifiable examples. My examples are documented and verifiable, either via search engine or AI.
If archiving is not a core function of forums, why do all forums do it? Then there should also be some that do not archive.
Only you can understand what similarities a letter, which has exactly one recipient, is supposed to have with a forum.
Greetings
CdB
a core function
Hi, could you please restore the 2025 roll call in the Australia section of the personals forum? There are a few very old posts that seemed to have been missed in your purge too.So I never actually provided announcements on this. They usually just happen to be who ever asks first, or if someone sees it mentioned.
Today, personals needed to be cleaned, including non zoo sections. I was nice and left a few.
Certain posts in some non-zoo porn sections were ripe with fakes and started to be come our main focus on modding.
This was intended to be a zoo forum. In fact, a better zoo forum than BF. But from some talk I've had in the past with others, this site was of course, being another BF.
I guess better late than never on this clean up. This may actually start to be an official process for now on.
Tons of personals were cleared, including much older ones. People responding to posts from 2022, and that user has never logged in since 2023.
Introductions were cleared.
Introductions is for saying you're new to the site, not for personal hook ups.
This site is not a dating site; Various users kept suggesting we have verification's; We are not a dating site. This is a zoophila site. Its focal point should be on zoo.
Please ensure you see the rules and report anything you see that may be in violation of the rules.
or maybe, just spitballing here, don't nuke random shit for shits and giggles? not like it really accomplished anything.From the reaction here I think next time it 1. should be announced a few days in advance and 2. once it is done, it is done. No debate.