vargasbintoon
Tourist
Do you all feel that zoo fantasies are inherently addictive? If so, is it because it's primal and encoded into our psychology, is it the inherent "shocking" aspect of it? What is it?
That's an interesting observation! So for you it's mostly that you're addicted to sex with humans (considered normal) but male k9s are substitutable for a male partner, yet unexplored territory?I think it'd be fair to say that I am 'addicted' to it. I am not a psychiatrist so I don't know where this comes from. My own sense is that my attraction is driven by my love of men (I'm a guy) and the anticipated thrill of playing with a male k9. So it's a mixture of the experienced (sex with men) and the unexperienced (a dog mounting me).
No I do not. There are literally milions of people who will never even consider having a zoo fantasy.Do you all feel that zoo fantasies are inherently addictive? If so, is it because it's primal and encoded into our psychology, is it the inherent "shocking" aspect of it? What is it?
I dont mean to suggest that it's common, just that there might be some aspect to the way our brain works where zoophilia feels natural to some people. To be fair you don't see myths or temples depicting people eating shit or whatever other fantasy, but you do find many examples of zoophiliaNo I do not. There are literally milions of people who will never even consider having a zoo fantasy.
They definitely defy the "encoded into our psychology" part and the only shocking aspect for them would be the sudden urge to vomit.
I think it seems more natural than kinks because it is, not to say that there an innately human urge to be with other species but it's precedented in history because it's just sex, not necessarily a Kink. People wanting to be with animals is far less synthetic a desire than scat play or watersports because it doesn't necessarily deviate from the regular reasons someone seeks out companionship whereas kinks come from our human desires for pleasure outside of what is normally considered pleasing.I don't mean
I dont mean to suggest that it's common, just that there might be some aspect to the way our brain works where zoophilia feels natural to some people. To be fair you don't see myths or temples depicting people eating shit or whatever other fantasy, but you do find many examples of zoophilia
I feel very similar about that. It's just sex/love but with an animal as a partnerI think it seems more natural than kinks because it is, not to say that there an innately human urge to be with other species but it's precedented in history because it's just sex, not necessarily a Kink. People wanting to be with animals is far less synthetic a desire than scat play or watersports because it doesn't necessarily deviate from the regular reasons someone seeks out companionship whereas kinks come from our human desires for pleasure outside of what is normally considered pleasing.
Sorry for the wall of text lol
i don't think i'd use the word substitute. i think male k9 would be an advance beyond. mansex is HOT. k9 looks to be HOTTER. and yes, as of now, sadly unexplored territory. i want to change that.That's an interesting observation! So for you it's mostly that you're addicted to sex with humans (considered normal) but male k9s are substitutable for a male partner, yet unexplored territory?
Omg yes they are!a matter of open-mindedness, but the fantasies of the zoo are addicting
Agreed.I think fantasies by definition are addicting.