Why are we into beastiality?

B0121

B0121

Tourist
I'm new to this whole scene and I've had a long debate internally as to why is this something that me (and we all) into beastiality.

I know that a lot of fetishes are behavioral in nature from experience throughout someone's life but beastiality is something I didn't know existed and as soon as I saw it, it just clicked for me.

So the question is, why is something like this such a turn on for people. Is it genetic, encoded in our DNA?

Anyone's insight would be grateful as it would help me understand myself more.
 
I can only speak from my point of view. I'm a gay guy and when I came into puberty my body just told me that , I'm very much a Zoo into horses , but started with the family Labrador...as he showed interest in me when we were playing one day and he started humping it was instant my brain just said yes this is something I want ...then working with horses to be honest I loved my horses more than anything in the world...what triggered me into being more sexual with them was when a mare I had passed away and she was my first horse I owned ...I was absolutely shattered 😭 then in time I started to watch some stuff then was addicted to mares myself and it's just developed and developed.

I'm now very proud to be a Zoo , it's just so hard not being able to tell people ...I think I would have done better in Roman times , where it was an acceptable thing to do , they were often sexually active with their war horses as they were there partners as well as there horses ...they kept them alive and that bond was inseparable.

I think it's hard one to explain, I think it's in us from birth and comes out through experience...I think more people than we think would be Zoos if it was accepted and I also see that just like me being gay and others being straight...there are also people who would never be x
 
likestowatchinnc said:
There probably isn't a single reason. There are probably multiple reasons and combinations of reasons for any individual.
Click to expand...
Correct. For me it started with seeing animals as sentient, unique beings able to communicate across species, and being continually fascinated by them. One of those communications is the desire for sex, which is an amazing and intimate part of any relationship—accepting my doggo as having agency and communicating needs meant sex was a natural extension. And the rest is history.
 
B0121 said:
So the question is, why is something like this such a turn on for people. Is it genetic, encoded in our DNA?
Click to expand...
There is a documentary that examines the brains of actually gay goats. I guess you can not do that with people, so they have to use animals. There are (under microscope) visible physical differences.
So in this case homosexual orientation can be and probably is also in humans based on the physical wiring of the brain.
I imagine it is the same for other sexualities.
In my opinion being a zoophile is a developmental mishap. A dead end for that particular individual who is not going to reproduce. A mistake triggered by a variety of things.
But in all honesty I love being a mistake, because I get to suck on a fucking delicious dog penis. :p
 
B0121 said:
I'm new to this whole scene and I've had a long debate internally as to why is this something that me (and we all) into beastiality.

I know that a lot of fetishes are behavioral in nature from experience throughout someone's life but beastiality is something I didn't know existed and as soon as I saw it, it just clicked for me.

So the question is, why is something like this such a turn on for people. Is it genetic, encoded in our DNA?

Anyone's insight would be grateful as it would help me understand myself more.
Click to expand...
Very good question.. I really don't know, never think about that. 😝 I like it and that's it 😋
 
Speaking from my point of view... I don't know exactly, and I'm sure I never will. It just is what it is. I could point to a lot of the media and life circumstances that could have played into shaping my sexuality, but looking back the fact is from a very young age, even before I really knew what sex was, I had some kind of innate curiosity about it. For example I had a large plastic toy horse to ride on and when nobody was around I'd get underneath it and imagine there was a dick there (granted at the time I had no idea what a horsecock was like but I knew something should have been there...) And I had a lot of interest in furry media, enough so that it was frequently among my earliest fap material, even when I had more normal/human stuff available.

I also believe another thing that might play into it is that I've always been kind of a loner and a misanthrope who in some ways sees more value in other animals than in humans. Not to say that humanity is all bad or anything, but I've never had the desire to bring a human child into the world; meanwhile I can only wish I could father and help raise a dolphin or a horse. So that might play into it somewhat as well.

I guess that's all a long way of saying, I agree with Horselover's statement:
Horselover27SA said:
I think it's in us from birth and comes out through experience.
Click to expand...
 
BadMutt420 said:
Idk I fell into porn early on lol uncles nudie mags the video tapes when I was probably 10 or 11 ish the on my psp while me and a buddy were figuring out how to steal movies or episodes of TV to watch we found porn then shortly after I seen a chick sticking a horse cock into her pussy and been hooked since
Click to expand...
Ahh PSP porn. I remember those days fondly.

You must be about my age then; I'm 31.
 
ClickAndWhistle said:
Speaking from my point of view... I don't know exactly, and I'm sure I never will. It just is what it is. I could point to a lot of the media and life circumstances that could have played into shaping my sexuality, but looking back the fact is from a very young age, even before I really knew what sex was, I had some kind of innate curiosity about it. For example I had a large plastic toy horse to ride on and when nobody was around I'd get underneath it and imagine there was a dick there (granted at the time I had no idea what a horsecock was like but I knew something should have been there...) And I had a lot of interest in furry media, enough so that it was frequently among my earliest fap material, even when I had more normal/human stuff available.

I also believe another thing that might play into it is that I've always been kind of a loner and a misanthrope who in some ways sees more value in other animals than in humans. Not to say that humanity is all bad or anything, but I've never had the desire to bring a human child into the world; meanwhile I can only wish I could father and help raise a dolphin or a horse. So that might play into it somewhat as well.

I guess that's all a long way of saying, I agree with Horselover's statement:
Click to expand...
I doesn't matter how you got here.
Only, that you're here. Welcome.
 
ClickAndWhistle said:
Speaking from my point of view... I don't know exactly, and I'm sure I never will. It just is what it is. I could point to a lot of the media and life circumstances that could have played into shaping my sexuality, but looking back the fact is from a very young age, even before I really knew what sex was, I had some kind of innate curiosity about it. For example I had a large plastic toy horse to ride on and when nobody was around I'd get underneath it and imagine there was a dick there (granted at the time I had no idea what a horsecock was like but I knew something should have been there...) And I had a lot of interest in furry media, enough so that it was frequently among my earliest fap material, even when I had more normal/human stuff available.

I also believe another thing that might play into it is that I've always been kind of a loner and a misanthrope who in some ways sees more value in other animals than in humans. Not to say that humanity is all bad or anything, but I've never had the desire to bring a human child into the world; meanwhile I can only wish I could father and help raise a dolphin or a horse. So that might play into it somewhat as well.

I guess that's all a long way of saying, I agree with Horselover's statement:
Click to expand...
Lovely way of putting it 💕
 
It definitely sort of just developed within me naturally. How "normal" boys would start to take an interest in women during puberty I took an interest in animals instead. I never saw any zoo porn or anything by accident, the idea occurred to me first and I went out and looked for it.

I was never molested as a child or anything like that and I'm always shocked how many people think that it's the only way we become zoos. Like we're damaged goods. While I have absolutely every bit of respect and sympathy for those that did go through abuse I don't like that zoophilia and an abusive childhood are synonymous.
 
Animals are great companions and often are comparable to people in a relationship. And the difference in physiology draws some people in. Mostly because it's a different experience and we as a species are very curious to try things.
 
IMHO. it starts with the fact that nature (evolution) has made us sexually oriented animals so we will reproduce. But the desire to mate is rather general, and easily diverted. Once the diverted pattern begins to provide pleasure, it is reinforced. But beyond this, the initial diversion is probably influenced by our more generic attractions.

When I started into zoo there was no internet or readily available porn, so that is not why I became a zoo. As a young virgin man, I just wanted to experience real sex without all the commitment crap. So I devised a plan to get a large collie dog and try to breed her. But at first I was thwarted by her virgin pussy being so tight. Even so, I developed a huge affection for the girl, but my zoo tendency was frustrated. But the fact that I should devise such a plan says I had some propensity before I had any real knowledge.

Then, a sneaky male got to her and she had a litter. For a while, I did not realize that this had changed everything, but then I was taking a bath and she was beside the tub. I fondled her and she stood up with her butt toward me. So I sat on the edge of the tub and tried once again to penetrate her. This time I was amazed that I slid right in. The sensation was beyond words, and I soon was addicted. But to my total amazement, she was too. Whenever we had sex, she would get the zoomies afterward, taking brief breaks to lick herself before zooming again. That was the crucial thing, because I now knew I could not only satisfy myself, but also my animal partner.

As I got older, I became aware of the terrible way we treat domestic "stock" and virtually all animals that are not pets. I also found that the majority of people had no clue of how animals responded to sexual advances, and made up a completely nonexistent dialog about bestiality being terrible abuse. Now I relish intimacy with other species and feel fulfilled when they respond positively.

I have had many sexual relationships with women, but I have found most disappointing, or I have wondered about the motivation of the lover. And finally, for some reason I find the genitals of female animals more attractive and exciting.
 
Why are we into it? The more important question is why have we existed since prehistoric times! Simply put I believe that we are just another variation of sexuality. A part of some natural order. Despite modern people hating it. They couldn't pray the zoo away :gsd_laughing:
 
B0121 said:
I'm new to this whole scene and I've had a long debate internally as to why is this something that me (and we all) into beastiality.

I know that a lot of fetishes are behavioral in nature from experience throughout someone's life but beastiality is something I didn't know existed and as soon as I saw it, it just clicked for me.

So the question is, why is something like this such a turn on for people. Is it genetic, encoded in our DNA?

Anyone's insight would be grateful as it would help me understand myself more.
Click to expand...
Maybe it had something to do with all the animal cartoons with with human traits we watched as kids. some of them went pretty far.
 
In my opinion the question is a bit misleading.
It could resemble comparably as well: "Why do some humans prefer missionary style and others doggy style, while another share prefers cowgirl position?"
Or: "Why do some humans find sex in nature highly arousing and preferable, while others prefer it in closed rooms with shut-off lights?"

It's all about personal interests. There are non-zoophile humans which have an interest in BDSM, partner sharing, 1001 different kinks and arousing fantasies, preferences, unacceptable activities and so on.

There are humans which are "only interested in other humans" but actually find it highly arousing if those other humans do activities or copulate with as example animals. They are not into animals themself.

There are humans which prefer oral, some prefer vaginal, some anal activities with their partners. There are some which prefer foreplay over all of those. Some which want or don't want to participate in specific types of their loved person's / animals sexual activities or games.

That's variability through individuality. Hard to say "you're right and you're wrong!" if not even the preferences between the common sexual interests (male human with female human) are in any way similar to another ones of that heterosexual human constellation participants.

Why do some people prefer car, some bus, some train and a few plane for traveling. Same as individual question.

As long as all participants can consent and are able to decide in their own best regards (which requires some fulfilled properties: mental capabilities through age and mental health, self-responsibility, no abused situational requirements, as example addictions) that's not different from choosing a train over a car to travel to work.

Some humans love animal race / breed X. And don't love humans. Or love both. All of this exists and it's no characteristic of "value" or "worth" or even "being right", "being abnormal", "being unacceptable". It's merely individual traits of a living being. And as long as the required properties are given and the participants are interested and consenting.. that's fine.
 
Last edited:
YanchaOkami said:
In my opinion the question is a bit misleading.
It could resemble comparably as well: "Why do some humans prefer missionary style and others doggy style, while another share prefers cowgirl position?"
Or: "Why do some humans find sex in nature highly arousing and preferable, while others prefer it in closed rooms with shut-off lights?"

It's all about personal interests. There are non-zoophile humans which have an interest in BDSM, partner sharing, 1001 different kinks and arousing fantasies, preferences, unacceptable activities and so on.

There are humans which are "only interested in other humans" but actually find it highly arousing if those other humans do activities or copulate with as example animals. They are not into animals themself.

There are humans which prefer oral, some prefer vaginal, some anal activities with their partners. There are some which prefer foreplay over all of those. Some which want or don't want to participate in specific types of their loved person's / animals sexual activities or games.

That's variability through individuality. Hard to say "you're right and you're wrong!" if not even the preferences between the common sexual interests (male human with female human) are in any way similar to another ones of that heterosexual human constellation participants.

Why do some people prefer car, some bus, some train and a few plane for traveling. Same as individual question.

As long as all participants can consent and are able to decide in their own best regards (which requires some fulfilled properties: mental capabilities through age and mental health, self-responsibility, no abused situational requirements, as example addictions) that's not different from choosing a train over a car to travel to work.

Some humans love animal race / breed X. And don't love humans. Or love both. All of this exists and it's no characteristic of "value" or "worth" or even "being right", "being abnormal", "being unacceptable". It's merely individual traits of a living being. And as long as the required properties are given and the participants are interested and consenting.. that's fine.
Click to expand...
Forgive me but you say the question is 'misleading' and then you talk about personal preferences. That not the question I asked, although I accept that my eloquence may not have been obviously clear.

What I was asking is can the desire for this be borne from something in our DNA? The reason is, I never experienced this and when I first saw it in a clip, it immediately felt a connection and didn't know why.
 
B0121 said:
Forgive me but you say the question is 'misleading' and then you talk about personal preferences. That not the question I asked, although I accept that my eloquence may not have been obviously clear.
Click to expand...

Maybe I missed the specific relation of your question, in that case forgive my imprecise response.

B0121 said:
What I was asking is can the desire for this be borne from something in our DNA? The reason is, I never experienced this and when I first saw it in a clip, it immediately felt a connection and didn't know why.
Click to expand...

DNA plays a role, but predetermination through DNA is not in the slightest comparable to the influences gained through experience (which includes everything - every experience in life including upbringing, positive and negative experiences (which do not necessarily have to be related to ones erotic emotional interests) and emotional situations) on one's own development.

Moreover, development is never complete, it can theoretically not only expand but also change over the course of one's life. Could. In most cases, however, sexuality will no longer change fundamentally after a given stadium of development, but will either consolidate or expand.

Hope that explains why "individuality" is based on experiences over lifetime, not mainly DNA. DNA is more or less a factor in ones hormonal-emotional (not purely thought-emotional) development and decisions, but less so in the basic interest.

As example: if someone would be predetermined by genetic traits to have a high temper, have a higher adrenaline level, leading into direction of attacking, insulting, fighting or - the contrary - self-despising, self-blaming results through hormonal level differences or the build-up of the related brain regions, this can surely play a role in how later sexuality will work out in real life.

But it doesn't define the interest behind ones sexuality. It merely defines the "how does one act based on the sexuality". And even this is quite easily able to get overpowered by mental control, it's no trigger which enforces one to do specific actions (only if there's no interest in not following those => missing mental self-control).


In regards to your "when I first saw a clip..": Surely enough you can have interests, even if you never knew precisely where or what those are aimed at. That's not uncommon.

And if you see / feel / experience / recognize the right aspect, you might feel like you did.

But the interest behind.. is neither "made" through the clip, nor "rooted" through the clip. It could only set a thought-direction into something which either was predefined by your experiences (and maybe to a very slight amount in your genetic, but that's merely a sign for direction, no road which only -leads- in this direction, big difference).

Or it could combine your interests which are already given with a "goal", a target. Which might be what your interests are based on.. or might lead to something comparable, "almost" the interest, nobody knows how precise "your" interests were beforehand. It's all an individual development and not made from granite with hard-engraved directions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top