• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

[POLL INSIDE] A Case Report of Zoophilia in Aceh Where Lack of Education andFamily Supervision can be a Trigger

How was your upbrining?

  • Close

    Votes: 45 7.2%
  • Religious

    Votes: 88 14.1%
  • Strict

    Votes: 51 8.2%
  • Distant

    Votes: 74 11.9%
  • Single Parent

    Votes: 84 13.5%
  • Sheltered

    Votes: 43 6.9%
  • Loving

    Votes: 157 25.2%
  • Abusive

    Votes: 66 10.6%
  • Unloving

    Votes: 15 2.4%

  • Total voters
    623
Not sure if anyone has seen this. I haven't read it simply because of the title. Though after seeing a recent review, I decided to take a look.
I don't have much to mention, but will quote some parts I read and give an opinion. Also I welcome anyone else, and I also included a poll which I don't think was ever put up. But I think for future surveys it can be useful and I will also add to this in a current Zoophilia Wiki post I'm working on.
This poll is anonymous.




Given that this report is talking about one person, a patient aged 37 whom only finished Elementary school, and did not have a great upbringing. Personally, I'm seeing this is claiming Zoophilia as a whole.

Relationship with my parents were. I guess so-and-so. Didn't seem like the typical white picket fence style family.


Edit: I made this thread a few days ago, and things got in the way, so opening it up to anyone else.
The word "paraphilic" alone is frustrating, the definition of this word just lumps zoos together with terrible disgusting people.
 
Ridiculous study, but I'm a big fan of philosophy, so I'll throw my 2 cents in anyway 😁

Without going into too much detail, I was very distant with my family from a young age. Apparently this is common for intelligent or gifted children born to lower working class families. The adults don't know how to relate to the child and lack cognitive functions to deal with them properly. The child is still a child, learning and growing, so he doesn't have the ability to handle the situation either. This often results in a lonely and unsatisfied childhood. Craving for social fulfillment results in deeper bonds formed with animals. Animals are primal, whereas humans operate from a conscious ego. Without the ego to interfere, understanding with each other is reached on subconscious and emotional levels.

This is where the hypothesis fails, at least for me. I am deeply bonded to animals, and have a deep love for them, but I don't have a sexual attraction. It is more that I see them as brothers and sisters. A connection in that I love them as fellow living beings; living a more pure and 'feeling' life, uncomplicated by navigating higher realms of conscious thought.

My pleasure comes from a  woman being with the animal. The sexual attraction for me comes from the human component. Sexuality and Spirituality are connected, and the modern historic take has been to suppress sexuality in an attempt to boost spirituality (Think Christian "Chastity is a virtue" "sex is for making babies"). In my home, sex was a bit of a taboo thing that should be repressed (not in a religious extremist way, but enough that it created some conflicts in my psyche due to my highly sexed nature, I think this is VERY common in North America). It's almost as if the pendulum swings from the repression and goes hard to the other extreme: an enjoyment of the purely physical.


This brings me to why I think most of us are here: The phallus is a symbol throughout all history and all cultures. Ancient vedic fertility rites involved sex between the queen and a horse. Few things in this world have the raw psychic power as the sight of a cock. Man or woman, Gay or straight, the sight alone is enough to interrupt thoughts and race your heart. It means  sex. Humans are a combination being; we are part animal, part spirit. By partaking in beastiality, we dive headfirst into our animal nature. There is no higher spiritual purpose, we are not  creating life; we are  enjoying the process of life itself.
It is an Exaltation of Sex. Not just serving the purpose of procreation, Sex is an act of beauty and pleasure that deserves our gratitude and deep admiration. Undoubtedly, there can be other undercurrents involved (Humiliation, Sub/Dom, etc.) But at its most powerful, it is Worshipping the pure physical sensuality of this earthly realm; our most animalistic act of pleasure:  sex.



Tl;Dr. Nah the study is stupid. I think majority of zoo's are people that really enjoy sex and appreciate it for what it is, with an open mind.


Ironically though, the study is kind of right in the sense of why I joined this forum: it does stem from a sense of being alone. Earlier I mentioned "understanding", and that's really the key. The only way to break isolation is to find people that are capable of understanding you. It's not possible to admit or talk about this stuff in real life, but everyone here can understand me, I'm sure 😄
 
Not sure if anyone has seen this. I haven't read it simply because of the title. Though after seeing a recent review, I decided to take a look.
I don't have much to mention, but will quote some parts I read and give an opinion. Also I welcome anyone else, and I also included a poll which I don't think was ever put up. But I think for future surveys it can be useful and I will also add to this in a current Zoophilia Wiki post I'm working on.
This poll is anonymous.




Given that this report is talking about one person, a patient aged 37 whom only finished Elementary school, and did not have a great upbringing. Personally, I'm seeing this is claiming Zoophilia as a whole.

Relationship with my parents were. I guess so-and-so. Didn't seem like the typical white picket fence style family.


Edit: I made this thread a few days ago, and things got in the way, so opening it up to anyone else.
Ngl I wished the fucking retards who perform these "studies" would just admit they're Bible thumping wack jobs who believe that only man and woman should have sex and believe sodomites should be stoned to death. Because anything that's outside of the norm for them is too much for their puritan little brains.
 
I had a good childhood. There was a divorce, I did have a single parent for a while, but my father has always been kind, loving, and supportive. Other than bullying in grade school for being nerdy, I can't think of anything seriously negative in my upbringing. We were not a wealthy family, and we had struggles sometimes, but we always had food on the table and my father did the best he could to provide for us.

During my adolescence I came to the realization that I simply did not have the interest in ladies or men that the other students around me had. I was only attracted to dogs and only interested in a canine partner. At the time I knew it was unusual, but I did not know what society thought about it.

Learning that most of the world thinks of me as a dangerous monster dealt some rather serious damage to the psyche of younger me. I'm in my thirties now and I'm still not entirely at peace with that, but I have accepted that life is unfair.

I grew up pretty sheltered and gullible so I thought "welp if this is what the average person believes, then they must be right and I'm damaged goods". Research, both academic and casual, helped me overcome this misinformation.

Conversations with users on Beastforum helped me realize how illogical and objectively false many of the common anti-zoo arguments are, the blanket statements and assertions made without context. Reading through academic papers and the (in)famous book Heavy Petting made me realize that, in terms of psychology, ethics, and animal welfare, zoophilia is not inherently harmful.

I do not know where my rare zoo-exclusive sexual orientation, my exclusive preference for canine romantic partners, comes from. Whether it's a thing I was born with, my society and upbringing, some combination of factors. I am pretty disillusioned with humanity, and I maintain cynical and misanthropic beliefs. I see the average person completely as being oblivious to grievous animal welfare issues in my society, to the fact that the USA, one of the wealthiest nations on Earth, chooses to maintain a poor standard of animal welfare. All the while, I am blamed for being part of the problem when, in fact, I am an advocate for the humane and compassionate treatment of animals and I donate to organizations such as the Humane Society and Best Friends Animal Society.

I used to volunteer as well with local animal shelters up until my mid twenties, when I realized that this was disrespectful to do. If the people who worked at the shelter knew the truth about me, they would not want me anywhere near the animals. Out of respect, I have refrained from volunteering in person since then.
 
Back
Top