Pictures of genitals as an avatar, yay, or nay?

  • Thread starter Deleted member 76481
  • Start date

Should pictures of genitals be allowed as avatars?

  • Yes, I don't see any issue with penises and vulvas as publicly visible avatars

    Votes: 434 47.4%
  • Yes, but only if it features both human and animal

    Votes: 31 3.4%
  • Yes, but only animal genitalia, since this is forum for zoophiles

    Votes: 165 18.0%
  • Yes, but only featured on animated characters

    Votes: 15 1.6%
  • No, photos of genitalia should stay in porn section

    Votes: 270 29.5%

  • Total voters
    915
I say no 😅 hope this doesn't offend any one's chosen pics because there still very lovely
We are all entitle to our opinions, so don't worry about offending people to much it's not like you were singling anyone out and saying they had ugly bits, you were just stating your own preference. And no one is denying genitals can most definitely be lovely, that doesn't mean there isn't a time and place to have them in your face, and when it's a bit less appropriate.
 
We are all entitle to our opinions, so don't worry about offending people to much it's not like you were singling anyone out and saying they had ugly bits, you were just stating your own preference. And no one is denying genitals can most definitely be lovely, that doesn't mean there isn't a time and place to have them in your face, and when it's a bit less appropriate.
Righteous my fellow people a beautiful way to say that you did
 
Personally these illustrations don't shock me. The avatar translates the personality of its author and must be protected from all moral restrictions whose limits are precisely indefinable.
 
No cock or pussy or dripping dog cock in a floppy snatch or a dirty ass

especially these prolapse rectums need to go! This is definitely not a site for red hankie pics!
 
When i see someones pfp is a dick i know what size they are but i still like to look at them
But, some of those are fake pics and they are not what they claim to be which is unavoidable really. Anyone can come on here and lie about anything. We just have to be vigilant to watch for the weirdo’s and depend on the mods and those who have been here for a while to spot the repeat offenders.
 
I like the variety of PFP's on here. I'm a STR8 dude with a girl and her dog PFP but rated "g" that leaves something to your imagination. I find my imagination more erotic than real life anyway...
 
Genitals as an avatar are not nice to look at. Okay, there are exceptions, my cock is beautiful and very very big, which makes it even more beautiful. But the vast majority of others are not. That's why I'm against dick pics as avatars.
 
Nah, it’s really kind of stupid. I am all about the dick, and love horse and dog bits considerably, but I’m also not about making any of it my whole life so much to the point that I need it to be the first thing I present to everyone happening by. So, my vote goes to only animal bits, but even that should be as tasteful as possible.
 
Me personally, I wouldn't want to set my av as anything like that just out of respect for others. It doesn't really bother me if others do it, not my account not my business. Just how I see it.
 
If nudity isn't okay then it isn't okay. If it is then it is, don't make it a double standards thing where only females can be nude in their pfp's. Stupid ass "no dick pics" pfp rule.
 
Revisiting this topic I ask myself WHY someone would want to post human genitalia pictures on a zoo forum, especially all the guys with penis monikers/avatars? Another thing I've observed are all the bestialists/fetishists here trolling for human sexual partners. Really, why don't they go to human sex forums to do their trolling?

Using genitalia pictures of any species, including humans, says to me that all that person is interested in is the sex. As awesome as sexual intimacy is it's only a small part of being a zoophile and of life itself. IMO this is just another example of how messed up the vast majority of humanity is and why I've chosen to be zoo exclusive.

Humans seem to have a talent for perverting something beautiful, precious and sacred into something profane...
 
And since a solution, Zoocadia, is available, why is this still an issue for you? Wouldn't care, but the lyric to your song hasn't changed a bit since you joined
 
I've watched enough porn that it doesn't register. I thought my original PFP was pretty tasteful, but it was still sexual, so I felt the need to get rid of it. I can accept many of the reasons people here give. The top two being..

1) Avatars are the same for the non sexual sections, so if you comment anywhere other than the porn section, people will inevitibely be forced to see it while reading the forums. My and your comfort with our bodies, and sexual desires don't have to be forced onto anyone. You don't post gay porn in the F/M section.

2) Not being taken seriously, with the possibility of bad intentions. I would like to be taken seriously as a zoo. A nude being the first thing is a bit much, unless it is all you are here for, and you are keeping your comments to the porn section.

My vote is everything or nothing..

The ultimatum would be seperate avatars for the the general chat/ mischevious areas, with zero favoritism towards the sex, or species depicted.
 
Yeah, no. If you wouldn't make your face your profile picture on this site, don't use your genitals either. Too many thirsty people using the forum as a pretext for trying to smash and regular dating sites won't allow them to post their only redeeming feature straightaway.
 
Back
Top