Major question regarding animal pornography and beastiality in general

[Animix]

I have a question that I haven’t seen anyone ask on this platform. How is it that there is more human female to animal pornography than there is with male human to animal ? Most of all the videos will be so short when it comes to the minority of content type, and seems as if human females are more into beastiality general.

Are my assumptions wrong?

 

[Mike1980Sthlm]

Been thinking of that as well. The amatour ones I think its because the guy is filming or dont "see himself as gay" so dont go near the dog in case of a stain from the cock haha

 

[honeyenthusiast]

From what I've seen, a lot of what gets posted is human female centered since its performs better. This is really present in things like ArtofZoo and K9Lady, who try and sell videos, and the rest kinda trickles off of that.

I'm curious about the amount of bestiality occuring that isn't posted, and the gender comparison there too. Seems pretty hard to gauge, but would be a cool stat.

 

[pes]

Are my assumptions wrong?

Yes.

There is more F/M content since most people who watch zoo porn are fetishists and not zoophiles and fetishists want to see women do weird stuff with something that might even be a dog but maybe it is a cat. But it literally does not matter as long as there is a "beautiful" poorly paid and completely incompetent actress in the same frame.

Male content is simply much less desired.

No women are not more into it. The imbalance comes from demand.

 

[pes]

From what I've seen, a lot of what gets posted is human female centered since its performs better. This is really present in things like ArtofZoo and K9Lady, who try and sell videos, and the rest kinda trickles off of that.

I'm curious about the amount of bestiality occuring that isn't posted, and the gender comparison there too. Seems pretty hard to gauge, but would be a cool stat.

A thread recently proved what research has proved earlier. The percentage of women into zoo has not changed from the +- 4%. https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/so-i-kept-going.50955/#post-1123302

 

[pes]

"German survey conducted in 1989, covering some 3000 adults, showed that three percent of men and two percent of women admitted to having had sex with animals"

"In the Hunt study (1974), 1.9 percent of the women had had sexual relations with animals, compared to
the Kinsey et al.’ s figure of 3.6 percent (for post-pubescent women)."

"In the urban population, about four percent of grade school boys were involved in animal sex between
the onset of adolescence and 15, and at the high school level, this incidence dropped to between one and four
percent."

"The incidence and frequency of animal sexual contact reported by the females in Kinsey et al.’ s
sample, were much lower than those of the males in the 1948 study. Only 1.5 percent of the total female sample
had some sort of sexual contact with an animal"

"An additional 3.6 percent of the females interviewed by Kinsey et al. reported having had sexual
contact with animals after they had become adolescents, but only 1.2 percent reported repeated genital contacts,
oral sex or intercourse. Half of the women who had sex with animals (1.8%), had these contacts after the onset
of adolescence and before age 21."

"Only one percent of those sentenced in Austria for bestiality were women, and they had sexual contacts with dogs."

This is from Hani Miletski Understanding bestiality and zoophilia study.

The Miletski's study 2002 has:
"Of the total 150 questionnaires that were sent out, 93 (62%) participants sent their completed
questionnaires back to me, which comprised this study. Out of 132 men, 82 (62%), sent back their
questionnaires, and out of 18 women, 11 (61%) sent back theirs. The study is made of these 82 men and 11
women."
Men were actually 7.4 times more into it in 2002.

Actually if you look at the zooville's gender poll and forget that it might not be completely accurate:

Poll on experience and gender

I'm just wondering who does what here, how gender and experience line up, or desire for experience for that matter.

www.zoovilleforum.net

71.1% of those who answered are male.
29.9% are female.
You can quite clearly see that women are not more into it.

Keep in mind that scientific research is much more controlled and takes lying more into consideration when you compare this to the thread above.
So in summary. Highest numbers are 4% of males and 3.6% of females.
You can maybe round it up to 4 and 4. So no, women according to science are not more into sex with animals compared to men and that even after giving them some free raise in percentage.

 

[Dankdunkdrunk2]

You can maybe round it up to 4 and 4. So no, women according to science are not more into sex with animals compared to men and that even after giving them some free raise in percentage.

This only counts people that are zoophiles. If you start looking at people that are willing to do it for money its disproportionately female. Just look at Tag the sponsor and see how many of these instagram models are willing to take animal dick for the right price.

 

[pes]

This only counts people that are zoophiles. If you start looking at people that are willing to do it for money its disproportionately female. Just look at Tag the sponsor and see how many of these instagram models are willing to take animal dick for the right price.

That does not mean women are more into it though. It maybe means women are more into money.
I can pretty confidently tell you that not a single one of the Brazilian actresses was into animal sex. Which is clearly apparent from their behavior and incompetence.

 

[Farmhand640]

I have a question that I haven’t seen anyone ask on this platform. How is it that there is more human female to animal pornography than there is with male human to animal ? Most of all the videos will be so short when it comes to the minority of content type, and seems as if human females are more into beastiality general.

Are my assumptions wrong?

Simple math. Vids are posted to make money. Latest reasonable estimation is that roughly 4% of the population is gay = a tiny percentage of people likely to watch and purchase a male on male anything. That does not detract from your wishes; and if you do even a reasonable cursery search there is fair amount of human male vids.

As to the "true zoo" answers. The vids are not love stories, they are porn.

 

[Dogdaddy69]

Porn equals money. And there's your answer. Go for the widest possible market to make maximum money.

 

[Animix]

From what I've seen, a lot of what gets posted is human female centered since its performs better. This is really present in things like ArtofZoo and K9Lady, who try and sell videos, and the rest kinda trickles off of that.

I'm curious about the amount of bestiality occuring that isn't posted, and the gender comparison there too. Seems pretty hard to gauge, but would be a cool stat.

So the general zoo-enthusiasts enjoy female to male. Which is fair, I’m one to enjoy it too. It just seemed to bother a little.

And yes! That would be so interesting to know.

 

[Animix]

Yes.

There is more F/M content since most people who watch zoo porn are fetishists and not zoophiles and fetishists want to see women do weird stuff with something that might even be a dog but maybe it is a cat. But it literally does not matter as long as there is a "beautiful" poorly paid and completely incompetent actress in the same frame.

Male content is simply much less desired.

No women are not more into it. The imbalance comes from demand.

It’s quite the unfair embalance. Thank you for your factual thoughts on the matter.

 

[Marinus18]

Another thing I notice though is that bestiality porn in general is pretty low quality. I mean from a technical perspective. Things like sound equipment, lighting, acting, editing, camera angles and so forth. Even when compared to other fetishes like ABDL.

 

[Gemini_shepherd]

Yes.

There is more F/M content since most people who watch zoo porn are fetishists and not zoophiles and fetishists want to see women do weird stuff with something that might even be a dog but maybe it is a cat. But it literally does not matter as long as there is a "beautiful" poorly paid and completely incompetent actress in the same frame.

Male content is simply much less desired.

No women are not more into it. The imbalance comes from demand.

I'm a male zoophile and perfer to watch women with dogs, but if the mood strikes me right I love to watch a man with a bitch and wish there was more content in that regard. I guess it's like a 60/40% for me. *Shrug* Maybe because I'm attracted to both women and dogs.

 

[DanielNRW]

"German survey conducted in 1989, covering some 3000 adults, showed that three percent of men and two percent of women admitted to having had sex with animals"

"In the Hunt study (1974), 1.9 percent of the women had had sexual relations with animals, compared to
the Kinsey et al.’ s figure of 3.6 percent (for post-pubescent women)."

"In the urban population, about four percent of grade school boys were involved in animal sex between
the onset of adolescence and 15, and at the high school level, this incidence dropped to between one and four
percent."

"The incidence and frequency of animal sexual contact reported by the females in Kinsey et al.’ s
sample, were much lower than those of the males in the 1948 study. Only 1.5 percent of the total female sample
had some sort of sexual contact with an animal"

"An additional 3.6 percent of the females interviewed by Kinsey et al. reported having had sexual
contact with animals after they had become adolescents, but only 1.2 percent reported repeated genital contacts,
oral sex or intercourse. Half of the women who had sex with animals (1.8%), had these contacts after the onset
of adolescence and before age 21."

"Only one percent of those sentenced in Austria for bestiality were women, and they had sexual contacts with dogs."

This is from Hani Miletski Understanding bestiality and zoophilia study.

The Miletski's study 2002 has:
"Of the total 150 questionnaires that were sent out, 93 (62%) participants sent their completed
questionnaires back to me, which comprised this study. Out of 132 men, 82 (62%), sent back their
questionnaires, and out of 18 women, 11 (61%) sent back theirs. The study is made of these 82 men and 11
women."
Men were actually 7.4 times more into it in 2002.

Actually if you look at the zooville's gender poll and forget that it might not be completely accurate:

Poll on experience and gender

I'm just wondering who does what here, how gender and experience line up, or desire for experience for that matter.

www.zoovilleforum.net

71.1% of those who answered are male.
29.9% are female.
You can quite clearly see that women are not more into it.

Keep in mind that scientific research is much more controlled and takes lying more into consideration when you compare this to the thread above.
So in summary. Highest numbers are 4% of males and 3.6% of females.
You can maybe round it up to 4 and 4. So no, women according to science are not more into sex with animals compared to men and that even after giving them some free raise in percentage.

Would be great to have the same study 20 years later and also including more participants.
I feel like people have become more open minded and tolerant over the past 20 years and also the internet might have helped to increase interest in sex with animals.
I, for example, might have never contemplated sex with animals, if a classmate didn't say he saw it on the internet.
Anyway, I hope there will be more research conducted.

 

[NaughtyMeowChan]

I don't find that true at all I find a ton of male porn out there. However what I seriously find exclusionary from this community is black women. Like I am mixed and have been super shy to connect into this community because it doesn't seem for me. It also became more apparently so when I changed the avatar and the flood of contact almost came to an alarming halt.
What's up with that?

 

[dick4me2]

the guys are into it alright, straight and gay, gays tend to be more open about it, less inhibited of what someone else thinks , straight guys need to overcome their so called "manliness" and when they do they contribute awesomely

 

[dogluver101]

Would be great to have the same study 20 years later and also including more participants.
I feel like people have become more open minded and tolerant over the past 20 years and also the internet might have helped to increase interest in sex with animals.
I, for example, might have never contemplated sex with animals, if a classmate didn't say he saw it on the internet.
Anyway, I hope there will be more research conducted.

There were a few different surveys I believe touched somewhat on that. Can't exactly find the specific one, but some are in the articles and blogs area. Including a couple through Zoophilia Wiki https://zoophilia.wiki/index.php/Category:Surveys

I don't find that true at all I find a ton of male porn out there. However what I seriously find exclusionary from this community is black women. Like I am mixed and have been super shy to connect into this community because it doesn't seem for me. It also became more apparently so when I changed the avatar and the flood of contact almost came to an alarming halt.
What's up with that?

There was another thread that touches on other colors a few weeks ago. I'm mixed as well, and since I'm not sure what your last avatar was. Just having a women's face or a vagina will get men coming.
I'm pretty sure hundreds of years earlier it was always whites, and due to slavery. There wasn't much for blacks. You just have to force yourself through the crowd pretty much.

 

[Dogdaddy69]

I don't find that true at all I find a ton of male porn out there. However what I seriously find exclusionary from this community is black women. Like I am mixed and have been super shy to connect into this community because it doesn't seem for me. It also became more apparently so when I changed the avatar and the flood of contact almost came to an alarming halt.
What's up with that?

As far as filming goes, I'm pretty sure you don't have to look a whole lot farther than where things are being filmed. Eastern Europe, Russia, Scandinavia in the old days, the US (population make up)......Despite what people think, this is a very niche thing and involves a lot less people than being here with a bunch of us might lead you to believe. The stuff coming out of South America features more dark skinned women, but again, the overwhelming majority of the population isn't very afro-centric. Mr. Unimportant uses several black women in his movies, but that's one company and a small number of films of varying quality.

It's my understanding this is extremely taboo in the black community in general, but I've only been told that, I have no real idea how true that really is. If so, I'm sure that plays a role in the smaller numbers here as well as overall. I've met several black women over the years, so I know they are out there. But, another contributor from my side at least.....I met them where there actually ARE black people. Most people tend to group up in like crowds and black k9 girl isn't likely to be where white barbie hangs out.

There are several threads about black zoos, and there are a fair number of black men and women here as well. And there are others who are mixed.

What does surprise me is that your attention level dropped after changing the PFP. If anything it should have shot through the roof. Other members I've talked to were almost overwhelmed with fetishist simps, flakes, and general weirdos. The mods must be doing such a good job of weeding them out, we're currently all out of stock.

There are others interested in black women who aren't slavering fetish hounds, but, again, I think those are also not thinking things through very well and expecting to meet black girls at the white mall. That's an oversimplification, I know, but I do think it's real.