Do you stop being zoo exclusive if you let a human use your sexualy?

Hewflungpew said:
If you can't see how labeling ppl is the same as racisum you are dumber than I think you are.

What is lableisum? Putting ppl in a class fitting to their behavior and or believes.
What am I white.. Is that a label? Sure as shit it is.

Not much differance, all it is is judgment on a different subject.
Click to expand...
Actually, I think I'll file that one under "circular firing squad".
 
KNOTTYBOYZ said:
sure, cause finding self identity is a sin lol. its the same as saying as identifing as a zoo is worthless thing. sure it'd be great if the world would just happily accept everyone for who/what they are without prejudice or misunderstandings, but wake up cause in reality its not so simple. People identify in certain groups because they find stronger support there and more understanding. You think a homosexual would find better understanding among a group of hetero's? Hell no, hence why this forum exists. If you don't believe in "labels" why the hell are you here? If not for the porn alone why the hell are you trying to push your opinion on others? because you want to feel commonality with a group that you identify with. Again you're points are completely negated and have not purpose in this thread, If you feel that groups and labels have no meaning then feel free to leave the forum, you wont be missed I promise you.
Click to expand...
Like Ron white said... You can't fix stupid.
And you are out of commission
 
KNOTTYBOYZ said:
and as I say, you cant fix self-delusional. Enjoy your lack of usefulness in this community :)
Click to expand...
Self delusional I can only laugh.
I bet you rent an apartment, through your money away to a land lord like most of so called scociety..

My money goes into my land and animals and in my pocket.

I don't delued myself by any means.

Do you know what you want in a mate? Do you know what your future holds?

I do!

You want to talk delusional! Lets talk about your everyday life.

I'll bet you have a job that requires you to sacrifice your zoo side in more ways than one.

I bet you can barley afford to live.. Meaning all your money goes to a car, apartment, school. I'll also bet you think this will all be for yhe better good(working and giving your money away)

I can live off my land.. Whats mine is mine.
Is your apartment,car and life yours and yours alone.

I doubt it.
You live in a delusional scociety.

I do not.

You will scrape by in a city, while I feast on hog and love all my animals whenever I want.

You can live on fantasy island and have your delusional thoughts.

I will live my zoo life, with nobody to awnser to but myself
 
KNOTTYBOYZ said:
Oh my god your huberis is so fucking massive XD Youd be wrong on all points of your assessments if you think I have to sacrifice my zoo side by any means via my posting history, and my content must be a grand fabricated lie if that were the case. And I've never had to worry about how I live, I've always enjoyed unique financial comforts which has allowed me to enjoy my lifestyle to the fullest and without intruption, in fact I've never had to worry about "rent" or what have you since I've entered adulthood with the accomplishments I've made. If you really want to play contest on who has an enriching life in zoophilia game on, just keep watching my channel and watch just how "miserable" my life gets.

Gods if you have to lower yourself into acting like a brat that has to say "hey look how better my life is compared to yours, your a low life because you've proven how much of a sore piss-ant I am" then it's obvious you've proven you have no benefit to this forum at all and no substance to show for it. You provide no good advice for anyone and have only proven thus far your just a bully of the group. An outlier that, while although has some things in common with the group, has nothing positive to offer it. Your a shit stirrer, plain and simple.
Click to expand...
Go away you silly English pig dog! Or I shall be forced to taunt you a second time-a.
 
On the topic of personal attacks...

Can we tone it down a little?

Because I really would love to hear from Aluzky again, especially on the topic if he really considers that being called a non-exclusive zoo would equal a personal attack, preferably before the thread gets locked.
 
CritterFunatic said:
Because I really would love to hear from Aluzky again, especially on the topic if he really considers that being called a non-exclusive zoo would equal a personal attack, preferably before the thread gets locked.
Click to expand...
I don't think he's going to bite since he got butthurt over people having a different opinion on what zoo exclusive means in a thread he started asking for people's opinions.
 
FeralLovin' said:
I don't think he's going to bite since he got butthurt over people having a different opinion on what zoo exclusive means in a thread he started asking for people's opinions.
Click to expand...
No, he got butthurt over people beating him at his own troll game. All he's ever had to do on dozens of sites is grow up but he refuses and ends up paying the price.
 
I'm polyamorous, always will be polyamorous... Even if i enter into an agreed upon monogamous relationship. Being monogamous does not change the fact that i am innately wired to be polyamorous.

I see the OP is the same way.

If you can only fall in live with zoo, yet you let another human use you sexually, that doesn't change your innate wiring that you're zoo exclusive on an emotional and spiritual level of who you Are.

I wish I could have a human like you in my life. ;)

But it's also important to accept that other people have different opinions and see things differently and it's okay.
 
Aluzky said:
I'm sure I'm not the only zoosexual exclusive who is in a human relationship nor the last one.
Click to expand...
This is probably true.
However, why are you so worried about having a certain status?
If there are difficulties in relations with your boyfriend, is it not easier to think about modifying these relations in such a way that you mutually receive greater comfort from them? The world is made of compromises, as I think ...
Why do you need to get a place in the classification ...?
At a certain time, I asked similar questions about myself ... =)
At 20 years old, I considered myself as zoo exclusive. At 24 years old, I thought it was stupid to limit myself in communicating with people with whom I am pleased to communicate, because there are so few of them ... Then this communication did not concern sex at all.
At 30 years old, I conceived my daughter, hugging my dog. She lay nearby, in the same berth with us. The second dog seems to have been at a distance.

And yes, I still have difficulty having sex with my human partner. And I do not test them during intercourse with dogs. Fortunately, my human partner accepts this. And he doesn’t have the habit of ironicizing about it about it.


So far, I share some of the points made by zoo exclusive. Until now, I do not churn a significant mass of people.
What status do I have inside this zoo classification at the moment, to be honest, I don’t know. I can’t say that it really bothers me at the moment.

I am inclined to leave this question to those who will introduce the concept of zoosexuality in dsm-5. =)
 
Last edited:
l3w5 said:
However, why are you so worried about having a certain status?
Click to expand...

I got verbally attacked by a zoo, just because I was not a "true zoo exclusive" even though I'm 100% an excluzoo.

It is similar to how some gays will attack/bully gays if they ever did heterosexual sex and claim they are no longer gay and bully them.

IMO, it is not acceptable to attack/bully some for doing sex outside animals. Also, the fact that these people don't even what excluzoo actually means. It matter to me as they should know what zoo-exclusive/excluzoo means (as they are bulling people based on their lack of knowledge of the definition) and because they shouldn't bully others for having sex with humans.
 
I had absolutely no desire to call holivar. Sorrу.
Interestingly, those holivars that I saw here almost completely correspond to those in the Russian community. The same topics of discussion, the same ideas and opinions. The difference is only in some minor details. Amazing identity. =)
 
FeralLovin' said:
?‍♂️
It's bolded in post #54
Click to expand...

Excluzoo is the portmanteau of combining zoosexual exclusive words.

Since zoosexual and exclusive are real words with objective definitions. I'm not making up any new words. Also, since I'm a zoosexual exclusive (or excluzoo) I'm not attributing myself words that are not attributable to me.

Any questions?
 
(I'm answering this question for people in the forum and not so much...."him")

No, no and no. Being exclusive is based on an emotional/bonding relationship. A girl can be in a loving relationship with her doggie, horse, etc. but if she feels like having human sex then its just sex. She's still in a loving bonding relationship with her animal. Also a girl can have no type of interest in men and only stay in relationships with animals. Its like saying I'm vibrator exclusive but occasionally use a dildo. It doesn't make me less vibrator exclusive since I always go back to my loving and trusting vibrator.

I'm not exclusive to just animals because I need men in my life as well. Men! Not incels
 
Aluzky said:
Since zoosexual and exclusive are real words with objective definitions. I'm not making up any new words. Also, since I'm a zoosexual exclusive (or excluzoo) I'm not attributing myself words that are not attributable to me.
Click to expand...
What sort of fucked up dictionary are using to claim you are zoo exclusive?
exclusive
[ikˈsklo͞osiv]

ADJECTIVE

  1. excluding or not admitting other things.
    "my exclusive focus is on San Antonio issues"
    synonyms:
    complete · full · entire · whole · total · absolute · to the exclusion of everything else
  2. restricted or limited to the person, group, or area concerned.
    "the couple had exclusive possession of the condo" ·
    [more]
    synonyms:
    sole · undivided · unshared · unique · only · individual · personal · private · single · especial · dedicated
  3. catering or available to only a few, select people;
Please notice the part i highlighted above
Zoo exclusive means ONLY attraction to animals(to the exclusion of everything else)! If you have, or think about sex with humans you are NOT zoo exclusive!!!!
Actual zoo exclusives have ZERO attraction to humans!
People who claim to be Involuntary zoo exclusive are RETARDS, you are not exclusive if you wish to be with humans. You are simply unlucky, or unlovable enough to make a human relationship work.
 
Aluzky said:
Does a gay stop being gay if he lets a woman use him? YES! Unless he is experimenting and not certain if he is bisexual and not gay. Like sex with the other sex and you are not gay. If it is forced upon the person. Then they are likely still gay. Like many things there are definite grey areas were things overlap.
Does a heterosexual stop being heterosexual if he works on a gay porno? If you have have sex with the same sex and like it your likely bisexual and not hetero. I think allowing yourself to have same sex simply for money and only hetero in private, simply makes you bisexual with a prevalence for hetero. A true hetero might experiment but would never have gay sex again.
Does a zoosexual exclusive stop being a zoosexual exclusive if he willingly lets a human use him sexually? If he continues to do so then he is not exclusive sexualy.
Click to expand...
I can only climax with dogs, I only fall inlove with dogs. I still have my canine wife next to me. I can't climax with humans, I can't love humans like I love my canine wife or my past canine husband. I can't get any more zoosexual exclusive than that. If I let a human fuck me to make that human happy, my exclusive zoosexual orientation does not change, I'm still only attracted to dogs, I still only love dogs. Right?
Click to expand...
Honestly, a really complex question. There can be no doubt you are zoo sexual. The issue centers around the exclusive part,
excluding or not admitting other things.
"my exclusive focus is on San Antonio issues"
synonyms:
complete · full · entire · whole · total · absolute · to the exclusion of everything else

You are zoo sexual exclusive in love... but not exclusive in sex.
Having non zoo sex for any reason, even when you do not enjoy it with a human, creates a definite grey area. Removing the sexual exclusive part of the equation in many ways, if using the normal definition of zoo sexual exclusive.
This is the issue with people who wish to use labels on themselves or others .... lot of grey areas that often do not fit the normal definition of the label people wish to apply.

For instance
I am completely hetero sexual with humans. Even the very thought of another guy makes my stomach churn. There is no possibility i will ever experiment with a guy. So, i am hetero exclusive with humans now and forever.
With canines i am bi sexual, with a heavy preference towards males.
I basically do not fit one sexual label as hetero or bi. I am both, but, only in different circumstances.
I have not had a sexual relationship with a human in many years. I do prefer animal relationships in many ways. This does not make me involuntary zoo exclusive. When i don't really try much to create any type of relationship with humans.
 
As somebody who identifies first and foremost as a zoosexual, who is also involved in a relationship with a human; I can definitively say that being involved with a human does not damper my interests in animals in any way. As much as I love the companionship of my critters, my monkey brain needs human socialization. While I don’t particularly find humans to be attractive sexually, I can’t deny that some can be quite fun in that department. That said, if the choice was between a human or a four-legged critter, the four-legged critter is going to win out every single time. Being in a relationship with a human has not made me more “into humans“, as much as it’s just scratched my itch for being social. Humans are just hairless apes, but I doubt that really counts as being zoo.
 
Only sort of. My sexual encounters with humans have contributed to my feeling that it is necessary for me to be zoo exclusive.
 
Its fun to watch how zoo exclusives are sought to be incels, troll, not able to get women or something else time after time. Meanwhile non owner people wanking to women getting mounted by animals think they own this forum.
Last time i checked watching people fuck or getting fucked by animals or something similar isnt actually zoophilia. Its a creep fetish like peeping.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top