Count in Roman numerals

[Valkiria]

LXIII

 

[Barrry]

LXIV (=II^VI)

 

[Valkiria]

LXIV (=II^VI)

Right. 2*2*2*2*2*2=64

LXV

 

[humananimal]

Another way to do it
XXXXXXIIIIX or VXXXXCI ?

 

[Valkiria]

Another way to do it
XXXXXXIIIIX or VXXXXCI ?

You are correct, but you know the KISS rule (Keep It Simple, Stupid!)

LXVII

 

[Barrry]

Another way to do it
XXXXXXIIIIX or VXXXXCI ?

VXXXXCI ?=? -5-4*10+100+1 = 56

LXVIII

 

[Zacin84]

LXIX

 

[Valkiria]

LXX

 

[humananimal]

VXXXXCI ?=? -5-4*10+100+1 = 56

LXVIII

@Barry is right, I wrote an X to much.

 

[humananimal]

You are correct, but you know the KISS rule (Keep It Simple, Stupid!)

LXVII

I do ?. But Roman numerals is and was never simple.
Just to add to numbers was cumbersome.
And as far I know multiplication / division was not possible.
By the way :
Does anyone know why it became common to write the year for films in Roman numerals ?

 

[Valkiria]

By the way :
Does anyone know why it became common to write the year for films in Roman numerals ?

No. You tell us why.

 

[Gamerguy]

LXX

LXXI

 

[Valkiria]

LXXII

 

[humananimal]

No. You tell us why.

It was a genuine question, because I don’t know, but wonder why.

 

[Barrry]

It was a genuine question, because I don’t know, but wonder why.

It looks majestic.

LXXIII

 

[Valkiria]

LXXIV

 

[Barrry]

LXXVI

 

[AlysK9]

LXXVIII

 

[AlysK9]

LXXIX

 

[Barrry]

LXXX

 

[Valkiria]

LXXXI

 

[Barrry]

LXXXII

 

[Valkiria]

LXXXIII

 

[Barrry]

LXXXIV

 

[Valkiria]

LXXXV

 

[Barrry]

LXXXVI (Hey, Intel!)

 

[Michelle Flores]

LXXXVII

 

[Barrry]

LXXXVIII (the 1st with 8 "digits"?)

 

[humananimal]

Another way to do it
XXXXXXIIIIX or VXXXXCI ?

Surely not shorthand, but I had 11 letters ????

 

[Barrry]

Surely not shorthand, but I had 11 letters ????

Yeah, but they were against the (construction) law. ?

LXXXIX