Asexuals and zoos

[oakheartbear]

I'm a more or less asexual man. Specifically the term I've found that best describes me is aegosexual, which basically means that I like sex in theory but I don't actually want to be a part of it. I've recently started fantasizing about a relationship in which my partner is a zoo, and while I provide their emotional and practical needs, their sexual needs are filled by their animal partner(s).

I know it sounds like cuckolding, but the key difference is that I would be jealous if my partner was having sex with a human. The idea that my partner's sexual needs are being fulfilled by an animal just feels better for some reason. Does this kind of relationship exist? Maybe it's just a pipe dream. But if I can get answers anywhere I figure it must be here.

 

[Martian]

There's nothing physically impossible about it so it will exist if you can make it happen.

Out of interest, do you want this third partner to be an animal mainly because you are find zoo sex arousing or because an animal will not compete with you when it comes to fulfilling your partner's emotional needs (at least not on the same level a human would)?

 

[oakheartbear]

There's nothing physically impossible about it so it will exist if you can make it happen.

Out of interest, do you want this third partner to be an animal mainly because you are find zoo sex arousing or because an animal will not compete with you when it comes to fulfilling your partner's emotional needs (at least not on the same level a human would)?

Both. I find zoo arousing and I wouldn't see it as direct competition for my role in the relationship.

 

[oakheartbear]

what about yourself? I’ve never met an asexual zoo bc it seems like having sex would be a huge part about it so I’m wondering would you ever want an animal companion for yourself at some point?

No, at least not in a sexual way. I own three dogs and I've never even considered them in a sexual way. If I were to try practicing zoo it would be just through observing others

 

[Maylam]

Cuckholding seems to be a growing fetish/kink, in the sense that more are open about it now than in the past.
There's been a good number of men whom have said they'd like to see either girlfriend/wife pleasured by an animal and enjoy it more than sex with themselves, to where the woman would only want sex with animals. It's not a rare fantasy, but I cannot give how possible it would actually be to live out.

However you can be zoo and be asexual. That's no different than say being gay but asexual. You don't need to have sex to know who or what you like! Romantic attraction is valid, and you know yourself better than anyone else.

 

[Shy Little Thing]

Hey, another Zoo Asexual here. It's not entirely impossible and I can see it working depending on the partner. Probably even better than non-zoo relationships since there's less of a chance of the Allo partner just leaving with someone else.

 

[fatncurious]

I am sort of in the same boat as you as far as asexuality with arousal at zoo. I think knowing you are not alone shows this might be more possible than you thought.

 

[fatncurious]

what about yourself? I’ve never met an asexual zoo bc it seems like having sex would be a huge part about it so I’m wondering would you ever want an animal companion for yourself at some point?

Asexual zoo here. Asexuality is a bit confusing especially to people unfamiliar with it. In short, asexuality is the absence of attraction (within a spectrum I won’t go into detail about). One may still experience arousal, just not attraction. In my case, I am not attracted to people or animals, but am still aroused by and enjoy taking part in sexual activities. A neat way to think of it is like experiencing hunger but not wanting any of the food in your kitchen, so you eat a snack instead.

 

[Jmmp2803]

You do you friend

 

[femaleanonzoo]

I'm a more or less asexual man. Specifically the term I've found that best describes me is aegosexual, which basically means that I like sex in theory but I don't actually want to be a part of it. I've recently started fantasizing about a relationship in which my partner is a zoo, and while I provide their emotional and practical needs, their sexual needs are filled by their animal partner(s).

I know it sounds like cuckolding, but the key difference is that I would be jealous if my partner was having sex with a human. The idea that my partner's sexual needs are being fulfilled by an animal just feels better for some reason. Does this kind of relationship exist? Maybe it's just a pipe dream. But if I can get answers anywhere I figure it must be here.

i would looove something like this, though i do love human cock, i would die to be an animals plaything while being emotionally satisfied by a human. i currently define myself as demisexual lol

 

[MarlinCatch3]

I am Asexual Although I didn’t realize it until I read the above. I like the fantasy of providing a dog to mate with a woman but I’d never do it because I’m lazy and I’m not that obsessed with it. I have sex but often not attracted to my sex partner. The reason is I just want to fuck and go. I don’t like the relationship baggage, although I dont mind staying the night. I’m just not interested in the chase because I have so many other things I’d prefer to spend time on. I’m busy. So mostly I just dont have sex. Also I’m a fitness freak,healthy diet freak and demand same from my partner and those girls aren’t as abundant as I’dlike. So in the end I just go about my own business and never have sex. Porn also bores me by the way. Maybe what I really have is depression.

 

[Shy Little Thing]

I am Asexual Although I didn’t realize it until I read the above. I like the fantasy of providing a dog to mate with a woman but I’d never do it because I’m lazy and I’m not that obsessed with it. I have sex but often not attracted to my sex partner. The reason is I just want to fuck and go. I don’t like the relationship baggage, although I dont mind staying the night. I’m just not interested in the chase because I have so many other things I’d prefer to spend time on. I’m busy. So mostly I just dont have sex. Also I’m a fitness freak,healthy diet freak and demand same from my partner and those girls aren’t as abundant as I’dlike. So in the end I just go about my own business and never have sex. Porn also bores me by the way. Maybe what I really have is depression.

Sounds like you might also be aromantic, or at the very least be on the aromantic spectrum.

 

[MarlinCatch3]

Sounds like you might also be aromantic, or at the very least be on the aromantic spectrum.

I think so. I prefer a vigorous outing with a partner like exploring a new city by foot, hiking, Mtn biking rather than a candle lit dinner. In this way perhaps I am more similar to a canine than a human. I am a member of several sports clubs and their annual dinners annoy me. I participate reluctantly.

Now lets psychoanalyze you, lol. Why aren’t you interested in sex?

 

[Shy Little Thing]

I think so. I prefer a vigorous outing with a partner like exploring a new city by foot, hiking, Mtn biking rather than a candle lit dinner. In this way perhaps I am more similar to a canine than a human. I am a member of several sports clubs and their annual dinners annoy me. I participate reluctantly.

Now lets psychoanalyze you, lol. Why aren’t you interested in sex?

Jokes on you, I psycholanalyze myself all the time, lol

I am interested in sex. I'm just don't feel sexual attraction. To me, sex is just another activity to do and something I can do if I get along with another person. Of course, I still need to feel comfortable enough with someone to get naked with them which does make finding someone harder. I don't have the horny brain disregarding red flags or icks in personality or thought process. It's also harder for me to get in the mood with another person and stay in the mood if they fuck it up. It's a lot easier to get comfortable with an animal though.

But none of what you described is necessarily non-romantic. those activities could easily be romantic as well, with the right person.

 

[MarlinCatch3]

Jokes on you, I psycholanalyze myself all the time, lol

I am interested in sex. I'm just don't feel sexual attraction. To me, sex is just another activity to do and something I can do if I get along with another person. Of course, I still need to feel comfortable enough with someone to get naked with them which does make finding someone harder. I don't have the horny brain disregarding red flags or icks in personality or thought process. It's also harder for me to get in the mood with another person and stay in the mood if they fuck it up. It's a lot easier to get comfortable with an animal though.

But none of what you described is necessarily non-romantic. those activities could easily be romantic as well, with the right person.

I think many women are wired this way. I’d just say its an emotional connection which leads to sex rather than a physical attraction. I think I’m the opposite way. There are many attractive girls in my gym I’m interested in sexually but I wont prioritize dating and getting to know them because I know our needs are incompatible. Theirs is an emotional long term connection where mine is a no-strings sexual attraction. Since I dont like to waste time and I know its deceptive to play a game and misrepresent oneself and I dont like dinners, alcohol or any other stimulation I just decided I won’t have sex. Instead I invest my time into productive things and at the end of the day I still feel rewarded. I think this might not be Asexual since I do have a sexual attraction. But I’m definitely Asexual in the sense that I never pursue sex and I’m not bothered too much by not having it.

 

[MarlinCatch3]

Jokes on you, I psycholanalyze myself all the time, lol

I am interested in sex. I'm just don't feel sexual attraction. To me, sex is just another activity to do and something I can do if I get along with another person. Of course, I still need to feel comfortable enough with someone to get naked with them which does make finding someone harder. I don't have the horny brain disregarding red flags or icks in personality or thought process. It's also harder for me to get in the mood with another person and stay in the mood if they fuck it up. It's a lot easier to get comfortable with an animal though.

But none of what you described is necessarily non-romantic. those activities could easily be romantic as well, with the right person.

I guess hiking and exploring is romantic in a way. I don’t like being single, I do like group activities. I just dont like 1:1 romantic candlelight dinners. It seems like its too contrived and unnatural. I cant sniff a girl out at a restaurant.

I think you might just be more sexually attracted to dogs and other animals than you are to men. You can have a romantic emotional connection with a man and then kiss him on the cheek, say thank you and go home and couple with your dog. Sounds like a very nice ending to a romantic evening.

 

[Shy Little Thing]

I think many women are wired this way. I’d just say its an emotional connection which leads to sex rather than a physical attraction. I think I’m the opposite way. There are many attractive girls in my gym I’m interested in sexually but I wont prioritize dating and getting to know them because I know our needs are incompatible. Theirs is an emotional long term connection where mine is a no-strings sexual attraction. Since I dont like to waste time and I know its deceptive to play a game and misrepresent oneself and I dont like dinners, alcohol or any other stimulation I just decided I won’t have sex. Instead I invest my time into productive things and at the end of the day I still feel rewarded. I think this might not be Asexual since I do have a sexual attraction. But I’m definitely Asexual in the sense that I never pursue sex and I’m not bothered too much by not having it.

It's not that women need emotional connection, it's that women are taught to be cautious about people who pursue them. I assure you, women do feel physical attraction. It's just what they find attractive is not the same thing men would consider attractive. If you're talking about long term relationships, then yeah, women ideally want a man who cares about them. But that's more romance than sex at that point. Asexual, at least in it modern definition, is the lack of sexual attraction. You do feel sexual attraction, but do not pursue it because you think it's a hassle. You might just be Aromantic, because you are not interested in a romantic relationship and feel no romantic attraction.

I think you might just be more sexually attracted to dogs and other animals than you are to men. You can have a romantic emotional connection with a man and then kiss him on the cheek, say thank you and go home and couple with your dog. Sounds like a very nice ending to a romantic evening.

And no, I'm more interested in human men generally. Humans are more engaging and versatile when it comes to sex, and as someone into kink and exploring that side of sex and intimacy, I do prefer men. With animals though it is just easier to not overthink being sexy or attractive. A dog doesn't care what you look like and a dog doesn't secretly wish ill on people. It's a logical thing for me. With a dog, I get nice dick and the peace of mind that the animal connected to it won't intentionally harm me or others just because but lose out on the intimacy and versatility of sex, or I can be with a man who can do all the fun foreplay, kinks, and positions but deal with crushing societal expectations of sexiness and the real chance the he wishes and desires for humanity and the world are diametrically opposed to mine.

My willingness to be dicked down by a dog is less to do with sexual attraction and more about libido. definitely more a free casual use situation than me desperate for a knot lol

 

[MarlinCatch3]

It's not that women need emotional connection, it's that women are taught to be cautious about people who pursue them. I assure you, women do feel physical attraction. It's just what they find attractive is not the same thing men would consider attractive. If you're talking about long term relationships, then yeah, women ideally want a man who cares about them. But that's more romance than sex at that point. Asexual, at least in it modern definition, is the lack of sexual attraction. You do feel sexual attraction, but do not pursue it because you think it's a hassle. You might just be Aromantic, because you are not interested in a romantic relationship and feel no romantic attraction.


And no, I'm more interested in human men generally. Humans are more engaging and versatile when it comes to sex, and as someone into kink and exploring that side of sex and intimacy, I do prefer men. With animals though it is just easier to not overthink being sexy or attractive. A dog doesn't care what you look like and a dog doesn't secretly wish ill on people. It's a logical thing for me. With a dog, I get nice dick and the peace of mind that the animal connected to it won't intentionally harm me or others just because but lose out on the intimacy and versatility of sex, or I can be with a man who can do all the fun foreplay, kinks, and positions but deal with crushing societal expectations of sexiness and the real chance the he wishes and desires for humanity and the world are diametrically opposed to mine.

My willingness to be dicked down by a dog is less to do with sexual attraction and more about libido. definitely more a free casual use situation than me desperate for a knot lol

Makes sense. Actually find our stories similar in some regard. You prefer men but mistrust men, humans can deceive and reveal their true personalities later on. Dogs are honest, what you see is what you get. Also sexually they are harder to train. My interaction with women isn’t that I mistrust them but that my need for sex isn’t high enough that I want to invest lots of time into them. Doesn’t sound similar exact it is in that we’ve both chosen the easy way out, simple sex with a dog for you which you can have on demand. For me its a slow hand I can have on demand.

 

[Shy Little Thing]

Makes sense. Actually find our stories similar in some regard. You prefer men but mistrust men, humans can deceive and reveal their true personalities later on. Dogs are honest, what you see is what you get. Also sexually they are harder to train. My interaction with women isn’t that I mistrust them but that my need for sex isn’t high enough that I want to invest lots of time into them. Doesn’t sound similar exact it is in that we’ve both chosen the easy way out, simple sex with a dog for you which you can have on demand. For me its a slow hand I can have on demand.

I wouldn't say I've chosen the easy way out since I still very much want to have a human partner and I've never been with a dog sexually (only recently lost my V card to a guy) but I can see the similarities you're talking about.