Resource icon

Zoo Research and Data The DSM Diagnostic Criteria for Paraphilia Not Otherwise Specified

The category of ‘‘Not Otherwise Specified’’ (NOS) for DSM-based psychiatric diagnosis has typically retained diagnoses whose rarity, empirical criterion validation or symptomatic expression has been insufficient to be codified. This article reviews the literature on Telephone Scatologia, Necrophilia, Zoophilia, Urophilia, Coprophilia, and Partialism. Based on extant data, no changes are suggested except for the status of Partialism. Partialism, sexual arousal characterized by ‘‘an exclusive focus on part of the body,’’ had historically been subsumed as a type of Fetishism until the advent of DSM-III-R. The rationale for considering the removal of Partialism from Paraphilia NOS and its reintegration as a specifier for Fetishism is discussed here and in a companion review on the DSM diagnostic criteria for fetishism (Kafka, 2009). In the DSM-IV and DSM-IV-TR, the essential features of a Paraphilia are recurrent, intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges or behaviors generally involving nonhuman objects, the suffering or humiliation of oneself or one’s partner, or children or other nonconsenting persons that occur over a period of at least 6 months (Criterion A). Given consideration for the erotic focus of Partialism and Autoerotic Asphyxia, amending the operational criteria for Paraphilia should be considered to include an atypical focus involving human subjects (self or others)
First release
Last update
1.00 star(s) 1 ratings

More resources from Puhp

Share this resource

Latest reviews

These kinds of reports make Us all look bad. More garbage!
Yeah, some of these are insulting, but I do like watching to see how Zoo is treated in the DSM and general population. Even though it's an unflattering article, I think it's important to see what's being bandied about in the world outside of our little zoo bubble.