So you block people, on a porn site, for having liked to much porn?
I can't speak for OP but there's a difference between someone looking at porn and seeking "connections" as they call them. You can enjoy the NSFW content without going out of your way to find people and/or their animals to hook up with. Porn is a big focus here, sure, but this is also a general zoophilia/bestiality forum as well. That means both people who are zoo-exclusive or people who are only interested in this as a fetish/kink. This website caters more towards fetishists generally speaking. (Not criticizing that by the way, I'm just saying it how it is.)
I fall in the camp where I just straight up ignore people who aren't really trying to hide that they just want to get in my pants. It's nothing personal, I'm just not remotely interested in that. If that's how someone introduces themselves to me then I just won't bother writing back. I think blocking on sight is a bit excessive personally, but the block feature exists for a reason and can be used however one wishes and I'm certainly not judging that. I consume NSFW content here but that doesn't necessarily mean everyone does, and some might but specifically avoid any content with people in it. Consuming NSFW content also doesn't mean you want to hook up with people on the site. We're all here for different reasons, though there is obviously a majority here.
I mean I guess but not everyone who has a bunch of porn is a.... mindless....errr... idk person who only talks about dog dick.
Again, I want to point out that there's a difference between talking about dog dick and actively trying to find owners who will let their animals fuck random people in their area. This is what many people on this site are after, and what OP is trying to highlight is the unethical behavior that many of these people display. It's not necessarily about the porn. Though unethical porn is connected to this topic but that's kind of out of the scope of this thread.
I couldn't imagine letting someone I don't know mess around with my mate. As long as the animal is not being mistreated and is consenting (not being forced or otherwise coerced), then I can't really complain beyond the fact that I just find that to be uncouth and way too risky. What can't be refuted is that it's generally these kind of people who are more likely to mistreat their animal. Those seeking owners have a tendency to objectify the animal as a means to an end, the end being their own pleasure, and are generally likely to not care about the state of the animal as long as it does what they want it to do.
It's not
inherently abusive to let your animal fuck whoever, but there's a very fine line and a lot of those people tend to cross it. I'm not saying everyone like that is an abuser or anything, because that isn't true. It's all about the intent and the mentality.
