Keep it. We have to watch that crap to report it.I'm thinking we need to send the moderators a lifetime supply of brain bleach, or hard liquor whichever they prefer.
Good point, at least some of it can be recognized either by title or very quickly, like "mare and goat orgy" I'm sick of seeing that one.Keep it. We have to watch that crap to report it.
I do not understand the question.What thread happened?
Ohhhh in general i thought you meant "that" thread (you aiming at a specific one)I do not understand the question.
This thread serves as a means of showing the mods some gratitude for removing bad content as well as reminding users that stuff like that happens.
The number after + should mean how many threads the mod removed for you in that moment. That is how I use it. Although I suspect some people did no get that and some people probably just post a +(n+1) without reading the purpose. Nevertheless I hope it has the same psychological result.
Fortunately. This topic is objectively, verifiably and provably wrong and has nothing in common with zoophilia. So it does not belong here in any way shape or form.So the dumpster fire isn't actually a free speech zone after all.
Also think about what else is not allowed (and you are ok with that) and what it would look like if it was free speech. Your argument is nonsense.So the dumpster fire isn't actually a free speech zone after all.
It's mostly free speech, with a handful of exceptions. For example, threads the clearly violate the most heinous of rules will still require moderator action. You can't post PII on people, threads that are started with clear racist intentions (such as the "You N*ggers should all die" thread) will be removed, zoo-sadism will be removed, pedophilia threads will be removed, the sale of drugs via IM platforms will be removed, as well as a few other examples that have been removed in the past. As stated in the rules, it's mostly free speech, but you do also need to use a bit of common sense. A bit like the "Don't yell "Fire!" in a crowded theater when there is no fire" exception to free speech.So the dumpster fire isn't actually a free speech zone after all.
So you actually admit that it can not be free speech. So your argument is still nonsense.Like what? I'm not ok with much of anything being banned from discussion.