• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

Suggestion: doing sexual stuff with stray animals should be not allowed here

Cookiecaretaker

Cookiecaretaker

Esteemed Citizen of ZV
i see more and more stray-fucking topics comming up so:

doing stuff with stray animals should be not allowed here - get them adopt them or at least search them a good home thats the way to go (and help prevent that they multiply)


use them sexual and dump then back to the streets is wrong


(wild animals i dont care but stray animals are not wild and dont belong into the nature - they need propper care and safety)
 
Cookiecaretaker said:
i see more and more stray-fucking topics comming up so:

doing stuff with stray animals should be not allowed here - get them adopt them or at least search them a good home thats the way to go (and help prevent that they multiply)


use them sexual and dump then back to the streets is wrong


(wild animals i dont care but stray animals are not wild and dont belong into the nature - they need propper care and safety)
Click to expand...
110%?? No stray animal content. Its just wrong to fuck them and dump them again.
 
Silvervine said:
@pes might have some feedback as well and started the Abusive Porn Cleanup Thread.
Click to expand...
This is how it usually goes:

Did you ever go through with it?

I remember reading some internet stories og people who were Zoo exclusive enjoying the thrill of being in stray dogs into their homes for a night session. Though I believe these story are fake, did anyone ever have the thought or even actually did it?
www.zoovilleforum.net www.zoovilleforum.net
 
That's like saying don't fuck a homeless person without getting him a home as well. What actual arguments do you have against this?
- will the stray dog in case mind?
- will he be worse off having had maybe a dinner and a screw?
If both questions are answered with no, then maybe just let it be. I get it, stray dogs are sad and anyone worth their while would do something more to help it, but if in the end the dogs aren't worse of, we should also realise that there is no real reason to be against it.
 
? I'll answer before this hits the DF...

Not saying you do not have a point but.
1 - Like baiting, even of the animal is ok with it... Would you *really* want images of that in your porn stash?
2 - Doing it... Are you really sure you'd risk about health and temperament of unknown animals that usually happen to feel unsecure around people?


On the other side.
Even if that is banned here, same as on fencehopping. How is that supposed to be enforced unless it is *very* obvious or the poster seriously admits it?

I mean, I may call my own dog an stray or my horse "my neighbor stall" just to avoid linking myself to the activities if someone recognizes the animal.
Or, viceversa, I may just call "friends dogs used with permission" to my dog walker business customer dogs until someone can prove otherwise.

Still quite good for those not reading the rules, though ?
 
Goattobeloved said:
I'll answer before this hits the DF... Not saying you do not have a point but. 1 - Like baiting, even of the animal is ok with it... Would you *really* want images of that in your porn stash? 2 - Doing it... Are you really sure you'd risk about health and temperament of unknown animals that usually happen to feel unsecure around people? On the other side. Even if that is banned here, same as on fencehopping. How is that supposed to be enforced unless it is *very* obvious or the poster seriously admits it? I mean, I may call my own dog an stray or my horse "my neighbor stall" just to avoid linking myself to the activities if someone recognizes the animal. Or, viceversa, I may just call "friends dogs used with permission" to my dog walker business customer dogs until someone can prove otherwise. Still quite good for those not reading the rules, though
Click to expand...
I agree with you, I don't want it (I don't even have a porn stash) and agree it's unwise. But I don't feel everything I don't agree with or want myself should be banned. If no harm is done, no harm is done. That should be the only guideline needed. Same with people using peanutbutter. Totally unarousing. But the animal in question gets a nice snack, so why the hell do we care so much that someone isn't up to our moral standards? This reflex to try and forbid everything we find distasteful is exactly why being zoo is illegal in the first place. Why do we do the same?
 
waarom170 said:
I agree with you, I don't want it (I don't even have a porn stash) and agree it's unwise. But I don't feel everything I don't agree with or want myself should be banned. If no harm is done, no harm is done. That should be the only guideline needed. Same with people using peanutbutter. Totally unarousing. But the animal in question gets a nice snack, so why the hell do we care so much that someone isn't up to our moral standards? This reflex to try and forbid everything we find distasteful is exactly why being zoo is illegal in the first place. Why do we do the same?
Click to expand...
Well, I could go with the "going with a random animal is just physical, not really zoo love" thing.
I mean, this actually works like that for me, no relation, I won't be able to do anything.
It is like having a lovely girlfriend at home and caring one for the other versus getting a fast relief with an street crack whore who will surely get a few $ she needs (to keep killing herself).

But since the title of this forum says
Zoophilia and bestiality forum
So I understand this would be a mood point. Mentioning just for my background. Discussion wise lets pretend I just did not write this :)
 
I just thinking on how you would want the mods to enforce the rule.

I mean I can already see some grey areas of this kind of rule, and I can see some unfair enforcement of the rule.

Like:

Is it banable if you just taking a picture of a stray female in heat, or if a stray male having a boner so to speak?

Should a video of two stray dogs mating be banned as well?

And what about if there is a video of someone doing it with a dog, but the dog accidentally looks like it is stray?

The grey area seems to be too big for a topic like this, and alot could be unfairly banned because of xyz
 
Haze said:
I just thinking on how you would want the mods to enforce the rule.

I mean I can already see some grey areas of this kind of rule, and I can see some unfair enforcement of the rule.

Like:

Is it banable if you just taking a picture of a stray female in heat, or if a stray male having a boner so to speak?

Should a video of two stray dogs mating be banned as well?

And what about if there is a video of someone doing it with a dog, but the dog accidentally looks like it is stray?

The grey area seems to be too big for a topic like this, and alot could be unfairly banned because of xyz
Click to expand...
Good point.
I mean hell, if some ass hat picked up a stray, had sex with it, took a video and posted it, all they would have to do is NOT mention its a stray.
 
*nods and sighs* Some interesting and valid points and discussion. Considering basic human nature it's likely there is material here on ZV that violates the fence/owner hopping prohibition but objectively proving that's what the material is, unless the poster admits it, is virtually impossible...
 
rocky_dp said:
Good point.
I mean hell, if some ass hat picked up a stray, had sex with it, took a video and posted it, all they would have to do is NOT mention its a stray.
Click to expand...
Well.... Unlike some or how we know some people are, then I wouldnt mind to pick up a stray. If I can finance having a pet at home, then I will pick one up. Not to have sex with it, but rather to make sure it has a great home and shelter. I even will try to figure out who the owner is/was if I can see if it has a collar or is chipped
 
Haze said:
Well.... Unlike some or how we know some people are, then I wouldnt mind to pick up a stray. If I can finance having a pet at home, then I will pick one up. Not to have sex with it, but rather to make sure it has a great home and shelter. I even will try to figure out who the owner is/was if I can see if it has a collar or is chipped
Click to expand...
Basically what I did with my girl.
I had no intention of keeping her but she grew on me quick AF.
 
I can rehome a stray dog needing a good home to be cared and provided, a shelter to feel safe, have freedom and happiness, there's always a welcoming place for them with me . In my perspective and opinion, it's inhumane to pick up strays, screw them and dump them back in the street .
 
Theunis323 said:
I can rehome a stray dog needing a good home to be cared and provided, a shelter to feel safe, have freedom and happiness, there's always a welcoming place for them with me . In my perspective and opinion, it's inhumane to pick up strays, screw them and dump them back in the street .
Click to expand...
Is his life worse off after you screw him and put him back on the street? Sentiment aside, objectively? I'm with you, i wouldnt put them back on the street. But I wouldnt disallow someone else doing it, if the animal is no worse of. Would I consider them heartles? Maybe, depending on their situation. But if you gave the dog a choice, do you really think he would turn it down? We need to be able to look past our own feelings on a subject before we simply say 'I don't like it so i want it forbidden'. As i said, the same argument is constantly used against zoos in the first place.
 
I both agree with this post and have done this. I took a stray home and jerked him off, before giving him a bath and feeding him. I kept him in the garage for a few days until I could try and search for his owners. In the end, I had to surrender him to the shelter and he didnt have a chip. To this day I still feel guilty about it. I mean, I'm sure he was neutered and some loving family adopted him... but I could never know for sure. I wanted to keep him so badly but I couldn't. I think zoos have a soft spot for strays and most would want to keep them. At the very least, we genuinely care about their well being. But a fuck and dump? Absolutely deplorable.
 
That is overthinking ?

Getting an stray, giving some food and even letting him/her stay home even for only a short time is absolutely fine and something to thank you about.

After that, if you can find them a home, or a shelter or leaving them back where they already know how to move. Those are all good options depending on the circumstances.

IF there is something sexual on the process or not, well, up to you. As long as that was not the main reason, I would personally not consider it *that* wrong.



What I understand is the "no stray sex" concept discussed here is the...
"hey, nice dog, big cock... umm.. Come here Fido... food!!, come... come... come...into this dark alley"
*frus frus moment*
" now go away, you mongrel, I can not keep dogs at home"
(- Bonus points for recording the sex innuenfo, then uploading it here in the porn section)
 
Is it wrong to give a stray dog a treat without taking him in? Because to a dog sex and treats mean the same thing, a good time. You're all placing human morality on a dog. They aren't human, they don't view sex the same way we do.
I've never done it, but I don't see a single moral issue with taking a dog in for a good time, giving them a parting treat and waving goodbye come again soon
 
HyperWoof said:
Is it wrong to give a stray dog a treat without taking him in? Because to a dog sex and treats mean the same thing, a good time.
Click to expand...
Fair point. Although most people usually do sexual things primarily for their own pleasure, not for the partner's pleasure. Sadly.

Anyway, I also agree with others that "fuck and dump" is wrong. But "give them food and take them for a walk, then dump them on the street again" (or to the shelter where they are castrated and/or killed) is equally wrong, at least in my opinion.
 
Last edited:
Lots of good points here. I'm all for discouraging "strays as a fetish". Where people are clearly getting off to the idea of a fuck and dump relationship with poorly cared for, easily coerced animals.
By all means, take care of a stray for a day. Give them some good food, clean them up, take them to a vet if they need one, and if they're a horny critter then no problems with having a romp. But don't upload videos of clearly poorly cared for dogs here with the title "caught another stray fuck".
 
What bothers me a lot more is guys who go into animal shelters after-hours to take advantage of the captive dogs there. They must have a peril-of-getting-caught fetish to justify that level of wrongness. Maybe it's no longer happening much, due to the proliferation of security cameras. But there are plenty of reposts here of old content from at least three BF members who specialized in that stunt.
 
I feel there are different ways to see this, and it is more to do with the Consensual sex thing !!
If a Male human, takes in a stray female dog to have sex with it, that is Wrong, because he is making advances where they aren't wanted.
There is no way to know if the female dog is consenting to his advances, or just being Submissive to a Master type figure !!
For him to lead the way and go on with intercourse, I would call that Abuse of that Bitch !!

But !!

If a Woman invites in a Stray Male dog into her home, or private space, and befriends him, then offers herself to him, She is being Consensual, and if he shows interest in her, enjoys the taste and scent of her pussy, and also moves on to try Humping her, Then he too is showing his Consent, and that he wants to have sex with her !!
How is that Abuse ?

Even if she does send him out afterwards, He will be happy for his experiences, would he not ?

There is definitely a difference between a Man taking in a Stray Bitch with intention of Penetrating her !!
and a Woman taking in a Stray Dog, and offering herself to him !!
She is not forcing him to do anything, just tempting him and Consenting to him having sex with her, Which he will no doubt enjoy doing !!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top