ZV needed a cleanse

Meg97 said:
Soo.. can we expect of removal of non-zoo sections from ZV? Hm?
Click to expand...
lmao. Good one! That was talked about for years. Now we just ignore it. Until a very large thread gets reported so much. Like... over 10 times that now we're looking at the non zoo section more than other parts of the site.
I'm not comparing ham sandwiches to see if its real all day.
 
dogluver101 said:
lmao. Good one! That was talked about for years. Now we just ignore it. Until a very large thread gets reported so much. Like... over 10 times that now we're looking at the non zoo section more than other parts of the site.
I'm not comparing ham sandwiches to see if its real all day.
Click to expand...
Real or not, the only folks around here who give a damn about ham sandwiches are the ultra-thirsty wankers we'd be better off without in the first place.
 
dogluver101 said:
lmao. Good one! That was talked about for years. Now we just ignore it. Until a very large thread gets reported so much. Like... over 10 times that now we're looking at the non zoo section more than other parts of the site.
I'm not comparing ham sandwiches to see if its real all day.
Click to expand...
I will believe it when I see it!
 
Ok the purge of old thead or poorly followed topics but the doggedness some topics or towards the naked bodies of active boys and girls is too much, then the whole porn section should be eliminated, making such drastic choices and creating this scary situation without consulting the members of a forum makes the forum very weak, after all I am only a member but I have the power to stop following the forum, I know my opinion counts for little but a forum exists mostly because of its members who following the basic rules post and interact in the forum.
 
Moses01 said:
Ok the purge of old thead or poorly followed topics but the doggedness some topics or towards the naked bodies of active boys and girls is too much, then the whole porn section should be eliminated, making such drastic choices and creating this scary situation without consulting the members of a forum makes the forum very weak, after all I am only a member but I have the power to stop following the forum, I know my opinion counts for little but a forum exists mostly because of its members who following the basic rules post and interact in the forum.
Click to expand...
If you wanna see naked bodies go to pornhub, this is a zoo forum.
 
Moses01 said:
Ok the purge of old thead or poorly followed topics but the doggedness some topics or towards the naked bodies of active boys and girls is too much, then the whole porn section should be eliminated, making such drastic choices and creating this scary situation without consulting the members of a forum makes the forum very weak, after all I am only a member but I have the power to stop following the forum, I know my opinion counts for little but a forum exists mostly because of its members who following the basic rules post and interact in the forum.
Click to expand...
Hmm, looking at your few posts, almost exclusively one word, you haven't really contributed anything to the forum. So if you no longer want to participate in the forum, the damage is extremely limited...
 
dartel said:
If you wanna see naked bodies go to pornhub, this is a zoo forum.
Click to expand...
No naked animals anymore. Got it. All animals must be fully clothed just as Jesus intended, right? That's what you're saying. No naked… anything. Good thing most women clothe their dogs and horses. I love a good tux on a horse but then again, don't we all?
 
UR20Z said:
Which part of "Zooville - Zoophilia and bestiality forum" (which appears at the top of *EVERY DAMNED PAGE LOADED!*) is unclear as to what the topic of this forum is intended to be?
Click to expand...
The explicit lack of "ONLY" and "exclusively" before those words. Because they aren't there, it isn't said that the site is only and exclusively meant to be only and exclusively a zoophilia and bestiality forum.
 
OwnThatKinkGirl said:
The explicit lack of "ONLY" and "exclusively" before those words. Because they aren't there, it isn't said that the site is only and exclusively meant to be only and exclusively a zoophilia and bestiality forum.
Click to expand...
Willie was right - Kill all the lawyers (and lawyer wannabes)

Gawd but it's disgusting that some people can't even use their smarts to figure out the glaringly obvious meaning of something that's written in plain english....
 
KnottyFloof said:
but its a community and community memebrs want to see each others bodies.

like zoophile bodies?
Click to expand...
No. If I want to see a naked human I can see any naked human anywhere. There is no psychological "boost" to it belonging to human who just happens to share a particular paraphilia with me. Why would it?
 
The problem is not nude body yes or nude body no,
the problem is the hypocrisy of not saying that without the nude bodies especially of actives, shown for exhibitionism or seen for desire, this forum would have 70 percent less members, nudity and zoophilic sexuality move this forum much more than other things, it is a fact. Have the courage to make a choice, if we consider naked bodies of actives part of the forum topic then create a new section specifically for active exhibitionists but don't make ridiculous battles against naked bodies, otherwise delete all related threads. Choose.
 
Photos taken by users who are active here are certainly welcome and appreciated. I see a discrepancy with the countless users who download random images from porn sites and then spam the forum with commercial crap. Just one commercial photo with boobs and then hundreds of comments saying “hot,” “sexy,” “fantastic,” “I want to fuck you,” etc. In my opinion, these are the problem.
 
OwnThatKinkGirl said:
No naked animals anymore. Got it. All animals must be fully clothed just as Jesus intended, right? That's what you're saying. No naked… anything. Good thing most women clothe their dogs and horses. I love a good tux on a horse but then again, don't we all?
Click to expand...
That's not what Dartel was talking about and you know it.

KnottyFloof said:
but its a community and community memebrs want to see each others bodies.

like zoophile bodies?
Click to expand...
The kinks someone is into doesn't change how they look...

Hoverdog said:
this forum would have 70 percent less members
Click to expand...
If the only thing those members contribute, is dickpics and other nakedness... Who cares that they don't post it here any more?
Not to mention all the thirsty pornhounds swarming any and everything that even remotely seems to be a woman. Ugh.
 
katiegotjobs said:
Maybe the mods should start from scratch. Start over. Delete everything, everyone. Start new.
Click to expand...
It is not at all excluded that this will happen. The server is so outdated and so poorly run that it will crash once and for all and can only be started with a new and empty forum. Moreover, the previous admin and his friends run it, if they get bored with it, it will disappear permanently overnight.

I would not be sad at all.

However, it would be worrying if after ZV a person or people opened its successor who might be zoosadists or would operate it with even looser rules than BF.
 
Mass extinctions happened on Earth few times and they comes regularly so.. we can be sure that mass user ZV "extinction" will happen in future.. far future!
Sooner or later all communities will end their existence. It's just matter of time.
Old crashing servers, no backups, solar wind storms crashing Earth, AI become consent, massive power outages or angry banned lurkers revenge - there is lot of dangerous factors 😉
 
Hoverdog said:
The problem is not nude body yes or nude body no,
the problem is the hypocrisy of not saying that without the nude bodies especially of actives, shown for exhibitionism or seen for desire, this forum would have 70 percent less members, nudity and zoophilic sexuality move this forum much more than other things, it is a fact. Have the courage to make a choice, if we consider naked bodies of actives part of the forum topic then create a new section specifically for active exhibitionists but don't make ridiculous battles against naked bodies, otherwise delete all related threads. Choose.
Click to expand...
lol

You mean so you can drool over what you believe to be females but are in fact catfish that you are too ignorant to identify?

The FACT is, clowns like you are a huge reason why any of this is even a debate, CLOWN.
 
bohoc.jpg
 
Was there another purge?
Or was it the database still cleaning up?

Just asking as I am seeing users asking and noticing that all of a sudden they have lost the ability to DM and that there "message" count has dropped them below the 10 for DM's

Maybe some more specific posts were deleted last night?
 
Bossmandad said:
Was there another purge?
Or was it the database still cleaning up?

Just asking as I am seeing users asking and noticing that all of a sudden they have lost the ability to DM and that there "message" count has dropped them below the 10 for DM's

Maybe some more specific posts were deleted last night?
Click to expand...
Asking for a friend :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 
dogluver101 said:
So I never actually provided announcements on this. They usually just happen to be who ever asks first, or if someone sees it mentioned.

...
Click to expand...
I think you should start by removing all dildogging (so basically ~40% of the female humans x dogs section) and other abusive crap that is still being tolerated for some reason.
 
Cookiecaretaker said:
which other abusive crap - can u please tell details?
Click to expand...
We can start talking about the other abusive crap *after* dildogging (which is very unpleasant for the dog and even painful in most cases) is removed and banned. There is no point in discussing the other problems when one of the biggest of them (that is already banned in most other zoo communities) is being tolerated.

So, let's please focus on the dildogging for now. Thanks!

Please take a look at the related thread that I created some time ago.
 
CanisLupus said:
We can start talking about the other abusive crap *after* dildogging (which is very unpleasant for the dog and even painful in most cases) is removed and banned.
Click to expand...
Then report the bad content instead of making blanket statements.

the mods here are very happy to remove abusive content, but they’re not omnipotent. If you know of abusive content, report it.
 
Mare Lover 1975 said:
No there wasn't, like so many others all their posts were in the personals section and they've suddenly noticed they're no longer able to PM.
Click to expand...
Yeah.......I guess it causes butthurtedness when you wake up 1 day to realize you can no longer harass any random suspected female account for cyberwhack material........................................................................
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top