why many hate anal sex with animals?

[DonnyDoggo]

Why are there so many people who hate anal sex content with the animal?

I really don't understand.

Most anal topics, whether male or female, are soon deleted.
I always see the same explanation. It is not suitable for being forced sex, abusive sex, much bigger than the animal or even for being unhygienic.

are you kidding?

what's the logic?
why is this only applied to anal content?

If we use the same logic, we could only post content where he fucks us.

What is the difference of the vaginal? will they prohibit posting if they do not have a penis of the same circumference as a canine penis?

Won't you be able to post if the position the animal is in is considered abusive? Oh really?

This leaves content creators who only do anal, for having males, or females who only accept anal for having smaller vaginas, cannot post without risking being banned, even if unfairly.

I've seen a lot of content that can clearly be considered abusive, but the mods don't care. they only remove anal content.

I’ve also heard people complain that mods only remove content that they don’t really like, and not for breaking the rules. Why is a mare having her vagina hit by an arm not a problem just because she is big? Fuck you.

 

[ζion]

Agreed, I quite like the stuff ;-;

 

[pes]

Why are there so many people who hate anal sex content with the animal?

I really don't understand.

Most anal topics, whether male or female, are soon deleted.
I always see the same explanation. It is not suitable for being forced sex, abusive sex, much bigger than the animal or even for being unhygienic.

are you kidding?

what's the logic?
why is this only applied to anal content?

If we use the same logic, we could only post content where he fucks us.

What is the difference of the vaginal? will they prohibit posting if they do not have a penis of the same circumference as a canine penis?

Won't you be able to post if the position the animal is in is considered abusive? Oh really?

This leaves content creators who only do anal, for having males, or females who only accept anal for having smaller vaginas, cannot post without risking being banned, even if unfairly.

I've seen a lot of content that can clearly be considered abusive, but the mods don't care. they only remove anal content.

I’ve also heard people complain that mods only remove content that they don’t really like, and not for breaking the rules. Why is a mare having her vagina hit by an arm not a problem just because she is big? Fuck you.

Nice to fuck you too.
First let me explain how content removal works here. You report something you find wrong -> a moderator reviews it -> the moderator maybe discusses it with other mods -> a decision is made. So if you see something that is abusive, report it. You can probably imagine that 12 mods are not going to be able to review all content posted on the forum on their own.

The content removal is not applied only to anal content. I know it because I rarely watch anal content but I often report abuse in other types of videos. 90% of my reports end by the content being removed. So your claims of only anal being removed are completely and utterly false.

Mods are free to remove any content because they made the rules and more importantly they own the website. This is just how the world works here. For example on certain telegram servers you are not allowed to post feral yiff art and if you do, it is removed. Here it is the same thing, just different porn.

Now lets explain why porn can be considered abusive or worthy of removal.
You may have noticed that some things are quite hard to convey in a video. For example you often do not see the relationship between the animal and the human, you often do not see much of the animal at all, and so on. You can only judge the content by what you do see and when the person who made the video made poor choices and the video is questionable, it may be considered abusive and removed.

I do not like anal content for the very simple reason that it is very hard to prove that the animal enjoys it. I have in fact never seen any animal specifically ask for anal sex (I have seen dozens of animals ask for regular sex though).
I have seen very little evidence of animals enjoying anal sex (more often there is just an indifferent reaction). Due to the nature of animal anatomy an erection is not a proof of enjoyment. Even science confirms this.
At the same time lots of anal content is often provably abusive and then removed. And the fact that known animal abusers often do like anal does not help the matter much at all.
You can imagine that this does not paint anal content in very bright colors, at least not to me.

 

[KnotKnormal]

I personally haven't enjoyed anal penetration by objects. Even watching people to people porn, I am not so sure the female partner thoroughly is enjoying it. There are the rare few I've seen that have orgasms from anal sex.

Some of my human partners have initiated anal while we were fucking in the heat of the moment, but in such a scenario, I can plainly see she wanted it and likes it.

I can't speak for gay guys, but I'd imagine they would love to have vaginal sex if they could

I'm also on the thicker side, and anal often feels too tight. I LOVE vaginal sex especially knowing that women have so many nerve endings there for pleasure.

 

[Schuppentier]

I had a donkey once who seemed to not mind be taken analy, but, I do not really know if he did enjoy it. He did let me do my thing without butclenching, stepping away or any other negative or positive body reaction.

Some gelding like there but hole to be played with, but I did not find a gelding yet who actually liked being penetrated.

So, from my little bit of experience, I come to the conclusion, that it is very rare that an animal really enjoys it, maybe some tolerate it.

 

[Oldman]

Why are there so many people who hate anal sex content with the animal?

I really don't understand.

Most anal topics, whether male or female, are soon deleted.
I always see the same explanation. It is not suitable for being forced sex, abusive sex, much bigger than the animal or even for being unhygienic.

are you kidding?

what's the logic?
why is this only applied to anal content?

If we use the same logic, we could only post content where he fucks us.

What is the difference of the vaginal? will they prohibit posting if they do not have a penis of the same circumference as a canine penis?

Won't you be able to post if the position the animal is in is considered abusive? Oh really?

This leaves content creators who only do anal, for having males, or females who only accept anal for having smaller vaginas, cannot post without risking being banned, even if unfairly.

I've seen a lot of content that can clearly be considered abusive, but the mods don't care. they only remove anal content.

I’ve also heard people complain that mods only remove content that they don’t really like, and not for breaking the rules. Why is a mare having her vagina hit by an arm not a problem just because she is big? Fuck you.

Content creators? 90% of the stuff here is regurtitated from somewhere else, repeatedly. So it seems like by your rant that you enjoy seeing dogs held down and fucked anally, or tied down and fucked anally, or drugged and fucked anally. Those are the only ones we remove, clear forced content, or enough over the line to cause concern. We are for the enjoyment and benefit of the animal, not the other way around.

Nice to fuck you too.
First let me explain how content removal works here. You report something you find wrong -> a moderator reviews it -> the moderator maybe discusses it with other mods -> a decision is made. So if you see something that is abusive, report it. You can probably imagine that 12 mods are not going to be able to review all content posted on the forum on their own.

The content removal is not applied only to anal content. I know it because I rarely watch anal content but I often report abuse in other types of videos. 90% of my reports end by the content being removed. So your claims of only anal being removed are completely and utterly false.

Mods are free to remove any content because they made the rules and more importantly they own the website. This is just how the world works here. For example on certain telegram servers you are not allowed to post feral yiff art and if you do, it is removed. Here it is the same thing, just different porn.

Now lets explain why porn can be considered abusive or worthy of removal.
You may have noticed that some things are quite hard to convey in a video. For example you often do not see the relationship between the animal and the human, you often do not see much of the animal at all, and so on. You can only judge the content by what you do see and when the person who made the video made poor choices and the video is questionable, it may be considered abusive and removed.

I do not like anal content for the very simple reason that it is very hard to prove that the animal enjoys it. I have in fact never seen any animal specifically ask for anal sex (I have seen dozens of animals ask for regular sex though).
I have seen very little evidence of animals enjoying anal sex (more often there is just an indifferent reaction). Due to the nature of animal anatomy an erection is not a proof of enjoyment. Even science confirms this.
At the same time lots of anal content is often provably abusive and then removed. And the fact that known animal abusers often do like anal does not help the matter much at all.
You can imagine that this does not paint anal content in very bright colors, at least not to me.

I wish you could have seen a sweet donkey jack i used to own. He would clearly ask for anal, and when he got it, would push back hard wanting more. I kind of wished he would have allowed his massive cock to be loved and worshipped, but nope. He only enjoyed anal. It was not for me, but who am I to say no to a flagging donkey thats trying to pin you to a wall with his rear.

 

[caikgoch]

Content creators? 90% of the stuff here is regurtitated from somewhere else, repeatedly. So it seems like by your rant that you enjoy seeing dogs held down and fucked anally, or tied down and fucked anally, or drugged and fucked anally. Those are the only ones we remove, clear forced content, or enough over the line to cause concern. We are for the enjoyment and benefit of the animal, not the other way around.

I wish you could have seen a sweet donkey jack i used to own. He would clearly ask for anal, and when he got it, would push back hard wanting more. I kind of wished he would have allowed his massive cock to be loved and worshipped, but nope. He only enjoyed anal. It was not for me, but who am I to say no to a flagging donkey thats trying to pin you to a wall with his rear.

I've seen more than 1 pair of donkeys swap anal. Remember that if you mount one and he gets a hardon while you screw him, he's anticipating how he's going to fuck you next.

 

[Gokcoc]

I personally haven't enjoyed anal penetration by objects. Even watching people to people porn, I am not so sure the female partner thoroughly is enjoying it. There are the rare few I've seen that have orgasms from anal sex.

Some of my human partners have initiated anal while we were fucking in the heat of the moment, but in such a scenario, I can plainly see she wanted it and likes it.

I can't speak for gay guys, but I'd imagine they would love to have vaginal sex if they could ☺

I'm also on the thicker side, and anal often feels too tight. I LOVE vaginal sex especially knowing that women have so many nerve endings there for pleasure.

The ass has many... If not more nerve endings and if done properly is very pleasurable as well. I wouldn't trade my ass for a vagina. I like it because it is tight.

 

[JAMD101]

I've seen more than 1 pair of donkeys swap anal. Remember that if you mount one and he gets a hardon while you screw him, he's anticipating how he's going to fuck you next.

Idk why, but "He's anticipating how he's going to fuck you next." made me laugh. Not sure if it was meant as a joke but funny none the less.

Why are there so many people who hate anal sex content with the animal?

I really don't understand.

Most anal topics, whether male or female, are soon deleted.
I always see the same explanation. It is not suitable for being forced sex, abusive sex, much bigger than the animal or even for being unhygienic.

are you kidding?

what's the logic?
why is this only applied to anal content?

If we use the same logic, we could only post content where he fucks us.

What is the difference of the vaginal? will they prohibit posting if they do not have a penis of the same circumference as a canine penis?

Won't you be able to post if the position the animal is in is considered abusive? Oh really?

This leaves content creators who only do anal, for having males, or females who only accept anal for having smaller vaginas, cannot post without risking being banned, even if unfairly.

I've seen a lot of content that can clearly be considered abusive, but the mods don't care. they only remove anal content.

I’ve also heard people complain that mods only remove content that they don’t really like, and not for breaking the rules. Why is a mare having her vagina hit by an arm not a problem just because she is big? Fuck you.

For this, I'm sorry. Anally fucking a dog isn't good imo. Could seriously hurt them. And before someone possibly makes the "Male dogs fuck male dogs" Most male dogs get hurt from it. Their tailholes are not meant for penetration more-so because of how small they are compared to us. Especially when its forced, things could happen. If any choose to discuss my opinion, I ask to not PM me. I won't really respond to this after this, I just wanted to give my piece of mind on the matter. I'm absolutely not judging people for it. I, in my opinion, believe it's wrong. Everyone has the right to disagree

 

[Ruben]

Their tailholes are not meant for penetration more-so because of how small they are compared to us.

The size of tail holes varies among dogs.

The general idea, that a particular body part of a dog who is smaller than a human must also be smaller than said body part in the human, is demonstrably false. But I don't know whether that was what you were thinking or whether, for example, dogs you have known simply happened to have small tail holes.

 

[caikgoch]

Idk why, but "He's anticipating how he's going to fuck you next." made me laugh. Not sure if it was meant as a joke but funny none the less.

It's not a joke. Donkeys are commonly used as livestock guardians. That requires a pair because so many predators don't hunt alone but a male / female pair will form their own little herd with other priorities than the livestock. So a pair of jacks is the usual set up. I have watched a pair of jacks screw their way through a small herd of cows (no bull) and when the cows weren't in the mood, they'd take turns screwing each other.

There are lots of vids of jacks doing this and self sucking. They will not mind at all including you in their circle if you give them a chance. Jacks are notoriously horny little fucks. So are jennys for that matter.

 

[zeta27]

My brown horse likes anal, he puts his ass on me and my other stud when he want be fucked.
He lets himself be fucked by my other stud, what's more, he is asking for that.
When he want to be fucked, he puts his butt on me or on black stallion, he raises his tail, neighs and stand look at us, just like mares call horses .
it's true.

That sounds super hot Do you have any videos/pics about that?

 

[Lover of Centaurides]

I don't hate anal sex, but I'm really not moved by it. I don't see myself engaging in anal sex, because I have coprophobia (fear of feces). It's going to take a huge card to get me to plunge my penis into an anus (big butt cheeks on a woman or a perfectly big and round ass on a mare).

I do have to say that I don't like the idea of having anything put up my ass; my ex tried doing an enema on me, and that crap burned. I hated the lingering feeling of having the runs.

 

[FloofyNewfie]

When it comes to dogs in particular the idea of Anal sex is an uncomfortable one. Yes, I am aware that some dogs DO enjoy anal sex, they have a lot of the same sensitive nerves that connect to the genitals which can be stimulated by anal sex. Humans also posses these nerves. The biggest problem is that, for dogs in particular, the majority of them do not like anal sex. Normally you'll see them either tolerate it, or flat out show signs of discomfort to the point of being rape.

There's a second glaring problem as well... Of the zoos I've spoken to that engage in anal sex with dogs, the majority of them have eventually admitted to me that their dog did not start out liking anal sex. It was something that they had to acclimate the dog to accept through continuous prodding and poking. Usually they'll claim that the dog learned to like it, or that the dog learned to put up with it. If you're an ethical zoo, that statement should be sounding a bunch of alarms bells. You shouldn't need to acclimate the dog into sex, either they want it or they don't. Again, this isn't always the case, some dogs do like anal right off the bat and will even ask for it, but it's a minority of dogs from what I've seen.

Not ALL topics and porn involving anal sex is removed from the forum. Only those that are abusive in nature. It just so happens to be the case that a lot of content involving anal sex with animal, particularly dogs, falls into the abusive catagory and is therefore removed. It's just that simple, there isn't any conspiracies against you.

 

[DogSweden]

I don't hate anal sex

 

[FireShire]

A mini stud friend of mine loves his anus played with. He loves his rump being scratched while I screw him. Only time I enjoyed anal.

 

[DarkFox]

Nice to fuck you too.
First let me explain how content removal works here. You report something you find wrong -> a moderator reviews it -> the moderator maybe discusses it with other mods -> a decision is made. So if you see something that is abusive, report it. You can probably imagine that 12 mods are not going to be able to review all content posted on the forum on their own.

The content removal is not applied only to anal content. I know it because I rarely watch anal content but I often report abuse in other types of videos. 90% of my reports end by the content being removed. So your claims of only anal being removed are completely and utterly false.

Mods are free to remove any content because they made the rules and more importantly they own the website. This is just how the world works here. For example on certain telegram servers you are not allowed to post feral yiff art and if you do, it is removed. Here it is the same thing, just different porn.

Now lets explain why porn can be considered abusive or worthy of removal.
You may have noticed that some things are quite hard to convey in a video. For example you often do not see the relationship between the animal and the human, you often do not see much of the animal at all, and so on. You can only judge the content by what you do see and when the person who made the video made poor choices and the video is questionable, it may be considered abusive and removed.

I do not like anal content for the very simple reason that it is very hard to prove that the animal enjoys it. I have in fact never seen any animal specifically ask for anal sex (I have seen dozens of animals ask for regular sex though).
I have seen very little evidence of animals enjoying anal sex (more often there is just an indifferent reaction). Due to the nature of animal anatomy an erection is not a proof of enjoyment. Even science confirms this.
At the same time lots of anal content is often provably abusive and then removed. And the fact that known animal abusers often do like anal does not help the matter much at all.
You can imagine that this does not paint anal content in very bright colors, at least not to me.

Fuck you three! : ) Nobody wants your words