• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

Which pre-humans would you breed with?

Macropos

Tourist
BANNED USER
Alright, since we're all into screwing all kinds of species on here, i think we should give some of our human ancestors a thought too. So if you had the chance, either through time travel or cloning, to have sex and breed with one of the pre-human species, which one would you choose?

I bet most are going to say Neanderthal, because that's just the "cliche" answer.

ph17307.jpg


Denisovans may have looked pretty "normal" too:

file-20180822-149496-wrlmga.jpg


Homo Rhodesiensis hit the uncanny valley:

broken-hill-skull-reconstruction-two-column.jpg.thumb.1160.1160.jpg


Homo Habilis is way more animal-like:

12445.jpg.webp


Homo Floresiensis oddly sensual:

C0146152-Homo_floresiensis_model.jpg


But my favorite of all has to be Homo Georgicus, just so damn cutesy!

image14-1-300x235.jpg


So which one of these hotties would you have a go with, why and how?
 
You restricted it to Homo....Which leaves out a lot of pre humans...
Including bubbapithecus malodorus, who has relatives on this forum.
 
I can't necessarily say that I find any of them particularly attractive. They all pretty much hit the uncanny valley for me. I mean... Neanderthal is sort of the only one here that looks kind of passable. Hooking up with a Neanderthal would be like a regrettable drunken one night stand with a raggedy chick from a low-class small town bar.

But I'm sure someone here will find them attractive, but it ain't my thing.
 
Alright, since we're all into screwing all kinds of species on here, i think we should give some of our human ancestors a thought too. So if you had the chance, either through time travel or cloning, to have sex and breed with one of the pre-human species, which one would you choose?

I bet most are going to say Neanderthal, because that's just the "cliche" answer.

ph17307.jpg


Denisovans may have looked pretty "normal" too:

file-20180822-149496-wrlmga.jpg


Homo Rhodesiensis hit the uncanny valley:

broken-hill-skull-reconstruction-two-column.jpg.thumb.1160.1160.jpg


Homo Habilis is way more animal-like:

12445.jpg.webp


Homo Floresiensis oddly sensual:

C0146152-Homo_floresiensis_model.jpg


But my favorite of all has to be Homo Georgicus, just so damn cutesy!

image14-1-300x235.jpg


So which one of these hotties would you have a go with, why and how?
Whichever one is the hairiest! Also I wouldn’t touch a human female or near-human female because I don’t desire to procreate, which makes my response to this thread totally moot... ?

I have fantasized about letting a built, hairy, human ancestor fuck me crazy before though... ?
 
Alright, since we're all into screwing all kinds of species on here, i think we should give some of our human ancestors a thought too. So if you had the chance, either through time travel or cloning, to have sex and breed with one of the pre-human species, which one would you choose?

I bet most are going to say Neanderthal, because that's just the "cliche" answer.

ph17307.jpg


Denisovans may have looked pretty "normal" too:

file-20180822-149496-wrlmga.jpg


Homo Rhodesiensis hit the uncanny valley:

broken-hill-skull-reconstruction-two-column.jpg.thumb.1160.1160.jpg


Homo Habilis is way more animal-like:

12445.jpg.webp


Homo Floresiensis oddly sensual:

C0146152-Homo_floresiensis_model.jpg


But my favorite of all has to be Homo Georgicus, just so damn cutesy!

image14-1-300x235.jpg


So which one of these hotties would you have a go with, why and how?
Any? All? Species is just kind of a moot point to me. Interest in, and desire are.
 
The one that looks like an attractive female (and isn't dumber than I am, I'm pretty dumb.)
Prevaricator, procrastinator, antagonist (smart arse), elitist, self deprecating, oppressed (victim), liberal yes...but dumb? na never - maybe :LOL:
 
For the OP....neanderthalis is NOT "prehuman" since we carry their genetics forward with our own....along with, perhaps, all the other Apes of the Homo group....Now....the little blonde australopithecus kitten in that cave across the Rift......
 
Technically any mammal in our genetic history that eventually led to evolving into an ape and then us is a pre-human.
So I am definitely going down far enough to something that had 4 legs and was vaguely dog shaped.
Hopefully at some point we had something like this in our history. :D
GettyImages-168839747-f138782.jpg
 
Canis and Apes have next to nothing on common....its a whole other line from so far back as to be irrelevant.Humans didnt evolve from apes, in any case.
 
Canis and Apes have next to nothing on common....its a whole other line from so far back as to be irrelevant.Humans didnt evolve from apes, in any case.
I know. But we did have some sort of 4 legged ancestors somewhere in the history that were vaguely dog shaped. :D
I just did not want to put that amount of effort into searching what it could have looked like.
 
Very Vaguely at best...Miacis, I think...common to both dogs and cats...and all other four footers
 

Attachments

  • Miacis-epochs-Eocene-Paleocene.jpg
    Miacis-epochs-Eocene-Paleocene.jpg
    240.5 KB · Views: 6
Very Vaguely at best...Miacis, I think...common to both dogs and cats...and all other four footers
If that is about the size of a lab, then it is sexable. :D
If not, we have to go deeper. :D If there is nothing else, oral is always an option.
 
I think they were smaller, but Om pretty sure thats the start of all land-based carnivores, unless someone discovers a new one.
 
If that is about the size of a lab, then it is sexable. :D
If not, we have to go deeper. :D If there is nothing else, oral is always an option.
About the size of a modern weasel...I suppose you could do one orally....lol...Youd never need a shave again....20 claws no waiting.
 
Back
Top