So, presenting yourself to a dog who is willing and eager to fulfill his natural needs is molesting? Although morally questionable my defenition of molesting is being the penetrator. Getting fucked is what she wants, fucking a dog is what you are all about so who's the molester now?
Because it is not your fucking dog.
"she" as in @cherryblossomfoxx. Nice try twisting words to achieve focus on pronouns instead of giving your personal view ons this matter
I didn't gather that from your post. It was confusing what fucking you were talking about. Anyway I stand by my comment that it is molesting the dog if the dog is a) not your own, or b) you have permission from the owner. That is my personal view and is in fact even the rules on the forum.
This tells us more about why you are here than you seem to think it does about us.
Ah, you're one of those people.
Making unfounded accusations are we? I suggest that you tread very carefully with that garbage.
So you're confused what "fucking" I was talking about. Let me explain it to you. Either you fuck or you get fucked. @cherryblossomfoxx wants to get fucked. As I said before, I find it morally questionable to get fucked by a dog that isn't your own or without permission from the owner. However, this doesn't change my opinion about the defenition of "molesting"
I suggest you share your opinion about my "garbage" instead of just labeling it as "garbage"
Your opinion that any penetration of an animal is "molesting" them, while you are entitled to your opinion suggesting that someone that penetrates a animal is a molester @erphy in this case will get you banned unless you have evidence to back up your claim.
Very easy. In my opinion an animal is "molested" if a person performs sexual actions with it without the owner's knowledge or consent (aka , against the owner's will). To extend it, molesting an animal is also defined as using restraints and forcing sexual actions on it against it's will.
"Consent" is the key in this discussion. I do believe non-verbal communication can be a honest and reliable way for consent between human males and non-human females. That being said, I was triggered by the suggestion @cherryblossomfoxx would "molest" the dog of her roommates gf by just offering herself to him. I am convinced it takes a lot more to achieve consent in human male to non-human female intimacy then it is the other way around
I can not agree with this statement. Molesting has nothing to do with owner's knowledge or consent. Molesting is making unwanted sexual advances towards .. That being said, I certainly do not approve approaching pets without permission from the owner but I stand by my conviction if this would be the case, you can not label it as molesting
Consent from the animal is part 1 of a 2 part criteria. The animal and animal's owner need to both provide consent. Only exception is a wild animal, so sure if she spread eagle in the woods and a wild wolf decided to mount her sure go for it.
OK agree to disagree I'm fine with that. I extend it as molesting as having sex requires 2 part consent of the animal and owner. Violating any one of those in my book is "molestation".
Don't want to have sex with someone else's dog. I won't go into your house, I won't lie in your bed, I won't reach into your wallet, I won't drive your car.
