• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

A few questions

natronlee

Tourist
1. How long have you been exclusive?

2. Do you ever miss a human in a sexual way

3. (Sry if this is too personal) why did you go exclusive?
 
1. whole life

2. can't miss what i never craved.

3. ask whoever wired my brain.

you seem to read "exclusive" as "not currently with a human". you either are or are not, nothing in between. if someone is "currently exclusive" because of a bad break up or something, they're not really exclusive.

it's not an attempt at like a special badge or similar. just a "i have no sexual attraction towards humans" descriptor...
 
1. How long have you been exclusive?
Since ever.
2. Do you ever miss a human in a sexual way
I have a few homosexual human sex experiences. Which I have done out of curiosity.
And the result of each of these events has ever been that dogs are better.
Smells, taste, texture all of that is better with dogs.
3. (Sry if this is too personal) why did you go exclusive?
Born like that.
You do not choose it.
You will often see people use the term in this way and that is caused by misunderstanding what it actually is.
If you "go exclusive" because humans are no longer doing it for you, you are into humans and you would continue being so if you did not have some sort of a disappointing experience.
 
1. past two years or more

2. not really no

3. Because I've always been more physically attracted to dogs than people, it just took me a while to realize. I even tried to go back to people with a 4 year doggy drought and it wasn't going to work for me. Going back to dogs meets my needs, I still have lots of family and friends I socialize with of course.
 
I have a few homosexual human sex experiences. Which I have done out of curiosity.
And the result of each of these events has ever been that dogs are better.
Smells, taste, texture all of that is better with dogs.
Well you know pes ... uh people tell me I smell like a dog sometimes if you ever wanted to take a big ol wiff sometime 😉😘

Woof
 
I've noticed something on this forum, and it bugs me. Everyone seems to have a definition of zoo exclusive, and they always define it in a very narrow way. "It's this way, and that's just it, you either are or you're not." Most things in life aren't that simple. I know multiple zoos that are DEFINITELY exclusive, yet at some point in their lives have had human relationships/marriages for whatever reason. I fall into that category- I am zoo exclusive now. Was I born that way? No... but I have ALWAYS found horses sexually attractive since my earliest memories. While I don't adhere to your definition of zoo exclusive, I am exclusive, as are the others I have mentioned before. Could we please stop having such a narrow viewpoint of exclusivity? If someone says they have always been exclusive, great! Be happy for them! If someone says they became exclusive, great! Be happy for them! Let's stop defining and saying this is this and that is that and making everything narrow and rigid.

To answer your questions:

1. I have always had zoo attractions my entire life, but am now exclusive with my mare wife. We've been a couple now since February of this year, but we were together exclusively before that. Time wise I'd say around a year or so.

2. Sexually, I no longer have interest in women. Although I do still find the human female form appealing, I no longer find myself thinking in a sexual manner towards them, as IMO the equine form is the pinnacle of sexual beauty. My sexual thoughts are pretty much focused on my partner and wife, and she deserves my sole focus.

3. Falling in love with my mare changed me in so many ways. I find her incredibly irresistible... just her presence is amazing. I have never doted on anyone animal or human the way I dote on her. Just being in her stall and watching her eat is magical. Nothing could compare to this beautiful creature.
 
1. 5 years (going on 6) with my one and only beloved wife

2. No. Before I became exclusive I had human girls and I can still of course say if they are beautiful or not, if I like them or not (subjective opinion), but I don't regard them as an object of sexual attraction at all. There is nothing and no one more sexual/beloved for me than my mare wife.

3. I just realized at one happy moment that she is my love, my real other half and only with her I will be completely happy.
 
1. Since birth, I've never been in love, I've never had sex.
2. Never.
3. Because I found dogs sexually and emotionally attractive, but not people, so everything developed around that.


Could we please stop having such a narrow viewpoint of exclusivity?
A red thing will not be blue, it will be red. I will not distort the true meaning of a word because some people are unable to grasp its grammatical meaning.
 
A red thing will not be blue, it will be red. I will not distort the true meaning of a word because some people are unable to grasp its grammatical meaning.

That's not the case here though, and in reality you are simply helping prove my point. Both colors have thousands of shades. Reddish blue, bluish red. Very few things can be so narrowly defined. Even black and white have various shades. Fact is, there is no "grammatical meaning" of "zoo exclusive". Exclusive is not a permanent word, as it defines something in a current state.

Cambridge dictonary defines the word exclusive as:

D1: limited to only one person or group of people
D2: expensive and only for people who are rich or of a high social class

Neither definition implies permanence, and can change based on people entering of leaving a group or social status. So, by definition, if a person (such as myself and several others I know) is in an relationship with an animal or multiple animals and is solely in relationship with those animals, they are zoo exclusive, regardless of any other attractions they might have. If they engage in a relationship outside of animals, they aren't zoo exclusive at that point. With this in mind, those of you who were never attracted to anything but animals, I'd say to call yourself a "zoo purist". It's a better definition, as it says you are purely into animals and nothing else. My only beef with that is it sounds elitist, but I can't think of anything better to state that you are attracted to animals and animals alone.

For those of you that are solely attracted to animals, I am envious of you, as it would have saved me years of heartache and tribulation if I had solely been attracted to animals. I never would have married and my life, I feel, would be much different today.

I'm not trying to be divisive here, but inclusive. I WANT those of you that are solely attracted to animals to have that special definition of what and who you are. I also, however, want those of us that have become exclusive to be recognized for who we are as well.
 
1. How long have you been exclusive?

My entire life. It went straight there.

2. Do you ever miss a human in a sexual way

Nope. Never had any desire towards it. Tried it didn't work at all

3. (Sry if this is too personal) why did you go exclusive?

Destruction of human relationship and trust at a very young age, animals were always my safe spot.
You love and feel for what you are comfortable with not what you can't figure out and what tries to hurt you.
 
Back
Top