GizmoThePizmo
Tourist
Well, hopefully THIS TIME the new admin won't spend over 10K of forum funds on a shitty furry comic.if there are actions being taken to prevent the site from going down again like it did
Well, hopefully THIS TIME the new admin won't spend over 10K of forum funds on a shitty furry comic.if there are actions being taken to prevent the site from going down again like it did
Info like the county is all public knowledge via the ongoing court case involving the person that was arrested in MO.Ok NOW I’m real interested. Since word had traveled past social media and internet news. DM me the county for my own confirmation.
I was just about to ask the same thingHave we got a Zoovilles Telegram? Can I get the invite? : )
Read back in this discusssion. It is/was just for announcements.I was just about to ask the same thing
Yeah but they inherently believe there's exclusive/VIP zoo porn in there. Their pea sized brains can't think of anything else.Read back in this discusssion. It is/was just for announcements.
@FloofyNewfie Is it or can we put this somewhere visible so people know it exists? Even though it is mostly useless not very much maintained and silent for the majority of the year.And it is not a group, it is a channel where you can not post.
Zooville
t.me
same her glad this one is back also. What other site were you onThere were only two sites that I had a profile on and they both vanished at about the same time. Glad this one at least is back.
If that is what I think it is, it is not worth it.
full of pedophiles. and ''not worth it'' because they nuked zoo years ago.If that is what I think it is, it is not worth it.
Any evidence I’ve had has been shared with FloofyNewfie and won’t be shared publicly on the forum, with the exception of the Missouri court case which is already public record but I can’t say what that persons ZV username is because that would be “doxing”. Nothing will be public on here unless he chooses to share what he finds. The other guy claims to have more definitive proof than I had so we’ll see what comes of it.So there are two users (with new accounts, interesting...) who claim that a recent zoosadist case involves dogluver and that's why the sites were shut down.
Is there any evidence for this besides a few similarities?
If it really happened, then the zoophile community is facing a huge problem, because then the credibility of ZV and many wellknown big names will be leveled with the ground. The entire ZV was built to support ethical zoophilia (and porn).
If such a case really happened, then the credibility of all users will be zero. It wasn't advisable to blindly trust anyone anyway, but now you won't be able to trust anyone anymore, not even the staff. So the future of ZCA will also be a big problem, because who would want to use a forum with such a past, who can be trusted? This will cause huge damage.
Moreover, ZV can expect even more antizoo attacks in the future, because "ZV is just a sadistic site."
If it really happened.
I hope it's just a mistake.
Floofy is looking into it.So there are two users (with new accounts, interesting...) who claim that a recent zoosadist case involves dogluver and that's why the sites were shut down.
Is there any evidence for this besides a few similarities?
If it really happened, then the zoophile community is facing a huge problem, because then the credibility of ZV and many wellknown big names will be leveled with the ground. The entire ZV was built to support ethical zoophilia (and porn).
If such a case really happened, then the credibility of all users will be zero. It wasn't advisable to blindly trust anyone anyway, but now you won't be able to trust anyone anymore, not even the staff. So the future of ZCA will also be a big problem, because who would want to use a forum with such a past, who can be trusted? This will cause huge damage.
Moreover, ZV can expect even more antizoo attacks in the future, because "ZV is just a sadistic site."
If it really happened.
I hope it's just a mistake.
There is not really any way to completely know someone you only talk to online or even in person. That is just the reality of the ability to lie. We trust people based on their actions that we can know about. You do that as well and you can not say you know everything about every contact you have either.It wasn't advisable to blindly trust anyone anyway
Just because there was one asshole doesn’t mean the whole thing is rotten. Dont let the jerks ruin the whole thing for everyone. People will say what they will say.So there are two users (with new accounts, interesting...) who claim that a recent zoosadist case involves dogluver and that's why the sites were shut down.
Is there any evidence for this besides a few similarities?
If it really happened, then the zoophile community is facing a huge problem, because then the credibility of ZV and many wellknown big names will be leveled with the ground. The entire ZV was built to support ethical zoophilia (and porn).
If such a case really happened, then the credibility of all users will be zero. It wasn't advisable to blindly trust anyone anyway, but now you won't be able to trust anyone anymore, not even the staff. So the future of ZCA will also be a big problem, because who would want to use a forum with such a past, who can be trusted? This will cause huge damage.
Moreover, ZV can expect even more antizoo attacks in the future, because "ZV is just a sadistic site."
If it really happened.
I hope it's just a mistake.
I mean, ZTHorse is still around...Just because there was one asshole
May still be around. But that reputation is in tatters.I mean, ZTHorse is still around...
Yeah, I'm incredibly dubious of these claims coming from new accounts.So there are two users (with new accounts, interesting...) who claim that a recent zoosadist case involves dogluver and that's why the sites were shut down.
Should've just nuked his account to be done with him. To set an example. because he trots around like he's some kind of savior.May still be around. But that reputation is in tatters.
That would require removing the keys entirely. Of which has to be done by the top. Will they do such? I have no idea nor do I know any potential involvement of what’s going on. Pointing fingers and branding him of such would be wrong without any direct evidence. Vetting the top is an incredibly difficult task giving the nature of what we are involved in.Should've just nuked his account to be done with him. To set an example. because he trots around like he's some kind of savior.