• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

ZV needed a cleanse

nekdoneco123 said:
when "we" see the first female dog hopping vagina first on a penis by herself, we can perhaps apply this logic on males too.
Click to expand...
And I was actually thinking you had some rationality to you - then you had to go and say something this deranged????
 
nekdoneco123 said:
when "we" see the first female dog hopping vagina first on a penis by herself, we can perhaps apply this logic on males too.
Click to expand...
How convenient that you left out the exact part in your quote of me where I show I've steelmanned myself against this exact reply. Did you mean by "letting them decide" they should decide to tolerate it?

Oh and for the record, bitches will absolutely hop onto a penis vagina first on their own accord in the right circumstance.
 
Oily said:
Did you mean by "letting them decide" they should decide to tolerate it?
Click to expand...
and we're steering towards "they just tolerate it" already, yay!

by "letting them decide" i mean just that. leave enough room for a "no" and don't force anything, ever. it's obviously not very natural thing for them (tho there are plenty of cases of male dogs copulating together all the way to a tie so what do i know), doesn't mean they can't enjoy it... or seek it out.

not that you'll believe me, but my current boy does flag... anal initially wasn't even my idea, he likes getting his rectum and perineum rubbed and i merely tried how far he let's me push things.
 
nekdoneco123 said:
the only species with the capability to enjoy anal
Click to expand...
Just have a look on how vets gently perform prostate massage on stallions to analyse some pre-cum... it's a technical move.
Open eyes, open nostrils, floppy dick out, quick glances back at the vet, doesn't try to go away... most of the time they are more than ok with that.
I don't think stallions are vets fetishists.
I don't want to make the promotion of it though. I have the feeling some weirdos would use my words to stuff anything in some gelding ass.
 
Last edited:
nekdoneco123 said:
and we're steering towards "they just tolerate it" already, yay!

by "letting them decide" i mean just that. leave enough room for a "no" and don't force anything, ever. it's obviously not very natural thing for them (tho there are plenty of cases of male dogs copulating together all the way to a tie so what do i know), doesn't mean they can't enjoy it... or seek it out.

not that you'll believe me, but my current boy does flag... anal initially wasn't even my idea, he likes getting his rectum and perineum rubbed and i merely tried how far he let's me push things.
Click to expand...
That's why I don't automatically assume all k9 anal is abusive, while some undoubtedly is there's also those that are into it, much like my late QH mare that was very into it while my miniature mare will break your kneecaps if you try getting near her tail hole.
 
dogluver101 said:
I was nice and left a few.
Click to expand...
It's so nice to have admins that simply delete everything in the Europe/Other section, because who cares about the communities in the smaller countries right? It took years to collect a few people in our local post... and now well.. whatever. Apparently we are just lateral damage, because there were a few unactive or deleted accounts around and some individuals that were searching just for a quick hook up.
The main point/benefit of a forum is to keep history - that's what makes it better from the random Telegram chats.. but not here apparently.

dogluver101 said:
This was intended to be a zoo forum. In fact, a better zoo forum than BF. But from some talk I've had in the past with others, this site was of course, being another BF.
Click to expand...
Better? If the admins are even more radical, how can it be better? On BF they would actually delete users that were active on the forum just to create a toxic environment instead of building a community - here those users (some that don't even identify as zoos) attack in packs, ego boosting each other while pushing genuine users to write something that is against the rules and then getting them banned. I agree that there must be rules and modding, but we are only humans and not machines - I've seen admins here just seeing everything in black and white way too often - users getting banned over literally nothing! From my point of view, oppression and overly strict rules is not how you create a friendly community but just a passive aggressive place with a lot of frustration and anger building up. Or maybe I am just for waaay too long in this community and already too tiered of getting disappointed over and over again. :unsure:
 
Last edited:
darkwolf said:
It's so nice to have admins that simply delete everything in the Europe/Other section, because who cares about the communities in the smaller countries right? It took years to collect a few people in our local post... and now well.. whatever. Apparently we are just lateral damage, because there were a few unactive or deleted accounts around and some individuals that were searching just for a quick hook up.
The main point/benefit of a forum is to keep history - that's what makes it better from the random Telegram chats.. but not here apparently.
Click to expand...
Did you even read the first post here? The reasoning behind the cleanup?
If there are threads of actual value that should be restored, ask the admins and they'll look into it.

darkwolf said:
Better? If the admins are even more radical, how can it be better? On BF they would actually delete users that were active on the forum just to create a toxic environment instead of building a community - here those users (some that don't even identify as zoos) attack in packs, ego boosting each other while pushing genuine users to write something that is against the rules and then getting them banned.
Click to expand...
Maybe stay out of the DF...

darkwolf said:
I agree that there must be rules and modding, but we are only humans and not machines - I've seen admins here just seeing everything in black and white way too often - users getting banned over literally nothing!
Click to expand...
Provide one example of someone getting banned that didn't deserve it.

darkwolf said:
From my point of view, opression and strict rules is not how you create a friendly community but just a passive aggressive place with a lot of frustration and anger building up.
Click to expand...
Calling strict rules "Opression" is rulebreaker mentality. If those rules lead to frustration and anger, maybe this place is not for you.

darkwolf said:
Or maybe I am just for waaay too long in this community and already too tiered of getting disappointed over and over again. :unsure:
Click to expand...
Probably.
 
Bloit said:
If there are threads of actual value that should be restored, ask the admins and they'll look into it.
Click to expand...
In the section for small countries in Europe (Others), there was no important comments, some members were active, the rest just wrote a comment and we never saw them again. This is not a community, it is completely unnecessary to preserve its history. Moreover, after 4 pages, someone always opened a new thread for the same country, eventually there were 15 threads with 2-4 pages for a country with a population of 10 million and out of the 50 people who commented in total fox 4-5 years, 5 were active. These 5 people will make a new thread now.

People do not want to accept that zoophilia is completely dead in these small countries due to the small population and they insist on comments from several years out of nostalgia, because this shows signs of activity, in fact only falsely.
 
darkwolf said:
ego boosting each other while pushing genuine users to write something that is against the rules and then getting them banned. I
Click to expand...

Oh that's a good one. Yea. We somehow
get new members to sign up and upload sadist and cp just to ban them. Wtf logic is that.

Also bf would've banned you just for disagreeing.


I restored mostly everything and check the rest. Ill admit clearing it out entirely was too far.
 
Oily said:
So you think it is acceptable to anally penetrate dogs then?
Click to expand...
If the dog is ok with it yes, unless you are one of the cultists that thinks all dogs are flawless carbon copies of the one that told you No.

I sort of figured you where more intelligent than this?
 
Last edited:
Just saying, it would be nice if people would be friendlier when talking here. Of course it could be just because we are writing, and it's harder to read the emotions and tones. Something that is intended to be neutral could be read as rude. Even if we're behind the anonymous nicknames, we're all still living and feeling humans. I'm saying this just overall to everyone who happen to read this, as a reminder.

Yes, the purge was very sudden and very large, it surprised many of us.
Yes, the purge was obviously needed. I don't believe the moderators would do this if it'd be otherwise.

And still it's allowed to have all this feelings. It's allowed to feel sad and angry over the deleted threads, and it's allowed to feel frustrated with people who don't seem to understand the reasons behind this.
But it's not nice to be rude, these feelings don't justify it.
 
nekdoneco123 said:
and we're steering towards "they just tolerate it" already, yay!

by "letting them decide" i mean just that. leave enough room for a "no" and don't force anything, ever. it's obviously not very natural thing for them (tho there are plenty of cases of male dogs copulating together all the way to a tie so what do i know), doesn't mean they can't enjoy it... or seek it out.

not that you'll believe me, but my current boy does flag... anal initially wasn't even my idea, he likes getting his rectum and perineum rubbed and i merely tried how far he let's me push things.
Click to expand...
One my friends male dogs was a slut, he'd flag all the males of the neighbor hood and would all ways let go to full tie, the absolute horrible tragedy of it, my friend was a non zoo, what I would have given to breed him my self!

Sadly haven't seen it since so will say it is very rare, but a lot of males / females I have been in most will let you, and good deal seem to have actively enjoyed the interaction, more females granted then the males, but if they are not going to let it they make it very clear.
 
Flµff said:
Just have a look on how vets gently perform prostate massage on stallions to analyse some pre-cum... it's a technical move.
Open eyes, open nostrils, floppy dick out, quick glances back at the vet, doesn't try to go away... most of the time they are more than ok with that.
I don't think stallions are vets feshists.
I don't want to make the promotion of it because though. I have the feeling some weirdos would use my words to stuff anything in some gelding ass.
Click to expand...
lol a couple stallions would belly slapp at the track, disturbed the tech that was doing it, gave rest of us a good laugh made his job a night mare, just needed the Benny Hill skit music.

IMO Only cock should go in, never use any hard objects people things are sensitive in there and delicate!
 
Mare Lover 1975 said:
That's why I don't automatically assume all k9 anal is abusive, while some undoubtedly is there's also those that are into it, much like my late QH mare that was very into it while my miniature mare will break your kneecaps if you try getting near her tail hole.
Click to expand...
2 of my girls (K9) enjoyed anal a ton, one my minis ONLY allows anal, sadly 1 k9 passed, and the other age hit her like a brick wall and She's lost interest in any sex.

atm 1 girl leans more to tolerating it, and the other one doesn't mind but doesn't love it like the other two did.

The trick is knowing you partner, doing what they enjoy the most, and like any relationship you can ask for some thing you enjoy and then they will either say yes or no.
 
Idk. Purges may clear out the junk, which is good. But this is exactly how you turn away members. Why try to meet others if your post will likely be pruned? Why post content if the community is passive aggressive towards you? I mean just look at the comments here.
Idk. Seems like a good way to drive down engagement.
 
I did not understand this drastic deletion of so many threads and therefore posts! and what is the discriminating factor why some were not deleted. If then one of the main reasons is Fake accounts or Fake material go look at the ones you have not deleted. At least be consistent and delete everything. Nonsense
 
offgridk9lover2 said:
One my friends male dogs was a slut, he'd flag all the males of the neighbor hood and would all ways let go to full tie, the absolute horrible tragedy of it, my friend was a non zoo, what I would have given to breed him my self!
Click to expand...
my current boy will not only flag (you touch his perineum and his tail just flies aside when he's in the mood), but push back when "engaged" back there too. of course, none of the "it's rape because i said it is" ppl will believe. he weights more than i do and probably can overpower me easily if he ever wanted, he's a saint bernard.

pes said:
I feel this is irrelevant in this thread.
Click to expand...
you can nuke it all on the next round of random deletions.
 
nekdoneco123 said:
you can nuke it all on the next round of random deletions.
Click to expand...
Well, not me. :D
pes said:
Just a quick heads up, direct the questions about deleted threads to dogluver101 or Mare Lover, because I did not delete anything since I did not even know about the purge happening until it was already in progress and then I did not take part in it anyway. So I can not answer questions about what and where is gone.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top