• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

No more human dick pics as profile pic

Bloodwolf said:
Congrats! You represent maybe 1 to 5% of the population of the minority of the minority. Keep in mind what traffic actually comes through here and keeps the lights on. THAT is an unfortunate reality here.
Click to expand...
Oh, I know, and hear what you're saying...

I don't think I'm so much in the actual minority, but yes, definitely in the minority when it comes to those that speak out..

Case in point, I've been zoo since, oh 1987 or so..

Been actively practicing for several years, however never joined any forum or anything at all really until I came here months ago..

Makes me think that there's plenty out there that are comfortable in what they're doing and don't need or want to be part of something like this, whereas the pervs NEED something like this..

Or at least that's my theory on the disproportionate numbers...
 
My contribution to the "I am a dick week!"

Angles of dick - three hundred and sixty dicks in one.
smaller.gif

Feel free to use this free unsolicited penis as your profile picture. :p
Thank you anonymous googled donor for your flesh.
 
Keepinitlowkey said:
The member count dropping would not be a bad thing.
I don’t mind the dumpster fire. You know what to expect there. To say it spills out tho, is putting it lightly. I don’t know if you’ve ever noticed “stashes” posts, but they had many outside of the dumpster fire, and the mods took their sweet ass time banning that idiot. Then you have the jackass pes harassing members because he’s not attracted to them.

Great place this is…
Click to expand...
Were you not just bugging a member and arguing back and forth outside the dumpster fire a few months ago?
 
pes said:
I would limit it to human only.
Click to expand...
It would be easier to just forbid NSFW avatars and avoid the drama.
I mean, all the porn is not visible without an account, but you can see porn in profile pictures anyway in the general section as a visitor, which doesn't speak very well to them.
 
Austral said:
It would be easier to just forbid NSFW avatars and avoid the drama.
I mean, all the porn is not visible without an account, but you can see porn in profile pictures anyway in the general section as a visitor, which doesn't speak very well to them.
Click to expand...
To be honest several mods have said including me that this is not going to happen or is very unlikely to happen.
So I do not think there is a point in continuing this discussion anymore.
 
pes said:
To be honest several mods have said including me that this is not going to happen or is very unlikely to happen.
So I do not think there is a point in continuing this discussion anymore.
Click to expand...
Following was complained about fir years, then he finally budged and at least restricted lurkers against it.

It's ridiculous to not at least install the addon the would give users the OPTION to auto blur that shit.
 
dartel said:
It's ridiculous to not at least install the addon the would give users the OPTION to auto blur that shit.
Click to expand...
Addons are usually paid components which the admins have to either buy or pay for monthly. Which is an extra cost for the forum. Also they have to be compatible with the current version of the forum.
 
pes said:
Addons are usually paid components which the admins have to either buy or pay for monthly. Which is an extra cost for the forum. Also they have to be compatible with the current version of the forum.
Click to expand...
The one that took me 5 minutes to find and link on page 3 is all of $25. If the site doesn't have $25 to spend to protect its usrrs against sexual harassment then it's in huge fucking trouble.

And if that one isn't compatible, though it has multiple iterated versions with the last update in dec so it should be, then spend more than the 5 minutes it took me to find and find one compatible. If there's one addon they'll be others.
 
dartel said:
The one that took me 5 minutes to find and link on page 3 is all of $25. If the site doesn't have $25 to spend to protect its usrrs against sexual harassment then it's in huge fucking trouble.

And if that one isn't compatible, though it has multiple iterated versions with the last update in dec so it should be, then spend more than the 5 minutes it took me to find and find one compatible. If there's one addon they'll be others.
Click to expand...
Mods do not have the ability to install these or make these decisions. Wait for ZTHorse.
 
dogluver101 said:
Were you not just bugging a member and arguing back and forth outside the dumpster fire a few months ago?
Click to expand...
Yes, and do you remember why? Cause frankly I’m still a lil pissed off about how you all handled that situation with the puppy porn supporter.
If we’re gonna get into this, explain why it’s ok to harass members before a thread is sent to the dumpster fire? Are regular members allowed to determine what’s DF material themselves? Also, are mods allowed to body shame, or just be generally shitty people outside of the DF? Asking for a friend ?

*Edit* I’ll add this in for you @dogluver101
C62002F7-959A-4D3C-B113-6282018E6099.png

I’m not trying to drag you into this either @FoxandtheHounds, but your views on this sort of thing pretty much align with mine.
 
Last edited:
So this adult forum which is reasonably open to sharing of views, ideas, help and suggestions has a bunch of people that wish to censor and ban those who show genitals? Also these images may or may not be the poster's actualy image. But on the flip side, you are allowed to post those genitals or other people's in forums and messages (to which they don't own the rights to those images or intellectual property). I've had pictures and videos clips which were taken from another site and posted in a forum and that's ok but any skin or image of nudity will not be allowed? Didn't know the Inquisition was still around
 
pes said:
To be honest several mods have said including me that this is not going to happen or is very unlikely to happen.
So I do not think there is a point in continuing this discussion anymore.
Click to expand...
I think the hope is that if enough people continue to voice this opinion that ZTHorse will eventually realize that there are far more people who are bothered by it than would be upset by banning genital photos as PFP.

As I said before, I think it'd be interesting to see where in the ranking the people dicks as PFPs are in forum usage/activity.
Just to know... if you the member list was sorted two times: 1) post count 2) reaction score... How far down each sorting would the first person with a dick as a PFP be?
I think that'd be a quick and easy way to see how important the people who would be upset would be.
Maybe I'm wrong and they're the backbone of the community... but I doubt it.
 
allyfitz said:
I think the hope is that if enough people continue to voice this opinion that ZTHorse will eventually realize that there are far more people who are bothered by it than would be upset by banning genital photos as PFP.

As I said before, I think it'd be interesting to see where in the ranking the people dicks as PFPs are in forum usage/activity.
Just to know... if you the member list was sorted two times: 1) post count 2) reaction score... How far down each sorting would the first person with a dick as a PFP be?
I think that'd be a quick and easy way to see how important the people who would be upset would be.
Maybe I'm wrong and they're the backbone of the community... but I doubt it.
Click to expand...
It doesn't even have to be banned. Just give us a toggleable setting that will lets us choose not to have our eyes assualted while reading a "what book are you reading" thread just because it happens to be on an "adult" site. As I've said many times, even HOOKUP sites offer a toggle to not see random nudity. Hell, grindr, the king of gay hookup, doesn't even allow nude profile pictures.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top