• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

Banned Websites

Moderating a porn site would be a nightmare if you allow people to upload stuff.
It is here. Let alone something purely based on people posting only content and maybe comments.
You would have to watch hours of crap porn a week maybe a day or give up at which point you become the one hosting animal abuse.
And I would venture to say that the moment you allow people to upload, you will have animal abuse on your site in the matter of a few dozen minutes.

The majority does not see the animal abuse. What they see is the boobs and many other features of the human female/male/trans/whatever also involved.
 
idk, most likely none. lmao.
Any others just look like the same 90's format.
Sort of actually thought of running one myself.
Well if you go for it despite all warnings, please add some AI script that improves the image quality from VHS upanddownloaded a million times to modern 4K standards. Also nice if you can make that AI thing update those 70's-90's hairstyles to something more recent.
 
Also nice if you can make that AI thing update those 70's-90's hairstyles to something more recent.
No way!
Those pesky AI got the only video of Betty Boop doing a Thylacinus, and turned it into Jessica Rabbit doing a sheppy
🤦🤬
Lost forever now
 
there are videos on that aren't available anywhere else, especially in the highest possible quality
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello, it would be nice to have the list of video sites that are authorized
Those that are not on the list.
And if you happen to post links to a site that has CP, you will be banned and the site will be added to the list. You are responsible for the content you post.

We can not have a list of allowed sites because nobody knows all of the available sites. They pop up again and again with the same content, just different names. Reposts of reposts of reposts of decades old porn in 144p quality that halfbrains gobble up as "New to me" every single time.
 
Those that are not on the list.
And if you happen to post links to a site that has CP, you will be banned and the site will be added to the list. You are responsible for the content you post.

We can not have a list of allowed sites because nobody knows all of the available sites. They pop up again and again with the same content, just different names. Reposts of reposts of reposts of decades old porn in 144p quality that halfbrains gobble up as "New to me" every single time.
What happened to the Link Dump section of the forum? It looks like it was nuked?
 
There has been a few postings from a certain website that is also housing CP.

Do not post or even visit this website. Even just for zoo videos. There are plenty of other sites that have the same thing. Just without the CP added in. Links to this website will be removed. (Site name mentions mix. as the domain. A Russian site.)

If you choose to try to overcome the automatic filter. you will be given warning points.

Here is a list of websites that are NOT allowed to be posted on the forum in link form:

View attachment 667422



This list will likely be updated in the future, as more and more zoo porn websites with unmoderated CP content/adverts and zoosadism will likely arise in the future.
Thank you for sharing!
 
I feel like it would have been faster and easier to post sites that ARE deemed acceptable.

I frequent a lot of these sites, and have for years. Can't say I've ever come across any kid stuff. Not sure what that stuff would even have to do with the zoo content anyways.
 
Those that are not on the list.
And if you happen to post links to a site that has CP, you will be banned and the site will be added to the list. You are responsible for the content you post.

We can not have a list of allowed sites because nobody knows all of the available sites. They pop up again and again with the same content, just different names. Reposts of reposts of reposts of decades old porn in 144p quality that halfbrains gobble up as "New to me" every single time.
If I may ask, say someone posts something from a site not in the list. They found a video that's allowed to be here, but someone else knew or claimed the site had cp.. Somewhere on the site somehow.

Is the poster supposed to know every video and whether or not the site supposedly had cp in it? How would anyone know that unless they came across it first? Why a ban straight out the gate if nobody even knew before hand?
 
I feel like it would have been faster and easier to post sites that ARE deemed acceptable.
There are thousands of sites and new sites (with the same decades old content) pop up when one goes down. A whitelist is impossible to have.

Is the poster supposed to know every video and whether or not the site supposedly had cp in it?
No. We allow videos to even have a watermark of a banned site as long as the content is not breaking any rules.
Links are not allowed.

Can't say I've ever come across any kid stuff.
Lots of these sites are on the list for animal abuse. Chickens, fish, eel, live insertion, snakes, reptiles... other types of animal abuse and so on.
 
There are thousands of sites and new sites (with the same decades old content) pop up when one goes down. A whitelist is impossible to have.


No. We allow videos to even have a watermark of a banned site as long as the content is not breaking any rules.
Links are not allowed.


Lots of these sites are on the list for animal abuse. Chickens, fish, eel, live insertion, snakes, reptiles... other types of animal abuse and so on.
Oh okay. I must have misread. So instead of posting a link that will provide the video, you're saying it's safer to download the video, and then post it, skipping the link process?
 
Oh okay. I must have misread. So instead of posting a link that will provide the video, you're saying it's safer to download the video, and then post it, skipping the link process?
Word of advice.......

I wouldnt post anything I haven't viewed every second of, and have NO DOUBTS as to whether it conforms to site rules. Related to that concept, I wont even put a "like" on a video that doesnt meet that same criteria.
 
Word of advice.......

I wouldnt post anything I haven't viewed every second of, and have NO DOUBTS as to whether it conforms to site rules. Related to that concept, I wont even put a "like" on a video that doesnt meet that same criteria.
Oh I rarely ever post videos because of... Everything, but things I do post I usually have watched numerous times.

Though the way some things are worded still catch me off guard.
Like the rule: No large insertions

Does that mean I should never post people with horses or a well hung dog? The vagueness of some things makes me not really want to post anything to begin with
 
Search for "teen" on any questionable site and if there's any results odds are it's going to have content that we'd blacklist it for. Same thing for "chicken" "calf" or "foal" ect..
 
Back
Top