• Zooville Critical Notice, For all Users!
  • User Permission and Privilege Changes (PMs and Forum Layout): Sept. 20th, 2025: Please read the following announcement: CLICK HERE!
  • Update, October 4th, 2025: The ability to create NEW groups in the social groups area of the forum has been disabled. Click the hyperlink in the notification above for more information.

A push to remove personal ads advertising first time

Should we get rid of seekers

  • Yes, let's get rid of them

    Votes: 33 50.8%

  • No, I'm a degenerate and wanna fuck someone else's animal.

    Votes: 32 49.2%
  • Total voters
    65
First timers have to start somewhere and the personals would be a good place for them, you can post around the forum and chat to others and see if an owner comes by and is willing to chat and meet but the personals is a better bet for them
 
Because just want this thread needs is another unasked for opinion....

I see the risks and dangers of a personals/meet up section far out weigh the gains.

I'm sorry for none owners. I'm familiar with the feelings of longing and desire. I was there myself in the past. But the proper way to address those is the alter your life in a way that makes owning an option. If you just want the kink thrill, videos, pics, and stories are whats on the table. If your want to animal prostitute, not here. Please find a new home.

There is legitimate value to having a forum for knowledge, educational material, medium to vent, and content. To risk it by facilitating high risk hook ups just isn't a smart gamble imo.
 
CookieEnthusiasm said:
And what is your opinion? You didn't exactly give one.
Click to expand...
Yes they did, the rules make them feel safe. It's not good English but I managed to get it.

Theunis323 said:
I think , my opinion, the Personal Ads and Meetup should be for those looking to meet someone as a partner or for in long-term relationships .
Click to expand...
No! They should be 109% about what I'm looking for, lol

I just became owner of four dogs.

So sad I'm too busy trying to train them to behave or I could pull some of that dog whoring money!/s
 
Get rid of it? No.

Add some rules- only open to members who have been around for a certain amount of time or have certain post levels? Yeah, definitely.

I didn't think it's looking for connections or hooking up with owners that's the issue, but it's clogged with people who make no serious effort and don't actually engage with the forum at all beyond a beg post.
 
100% believe the personal section can use some reform, both for the safety of people who are too trusting and gullible, and for the animals that may be at risk. That being said, it is a cool to know you aren’t alone in your area, and that others like you are around. End of the day, freedom of choice is important and it probably won’t be removed because it does create some type (however awful) of a local community.
 
I don't intend on meeting anyone for any reason. I don't want to ever risk losing my four legged family, just by there being a chance in the mind I was meeting up for "activities." It scares me very much.

That being said, I agree in the sense we do not know until it is too late whether those wirh ill intent are neglecting, exploiting or abusing their animals privately, with those ads for intimacy. It can be lessened by overhauling the rules. ZETA stands for something. :/

I have no problem with people responsibly sharing intimacy, so long as everything-that-should-be is considered, however, we just dont know what is going on after these posts are acted upon. And that is what should be first considered...

Before I am asked to elaborate, here are a few considerations when you have 1. known someone for awhile, 2. see your companion/lover take an interest.
(My brain is mush, please don't assume I am leaving somehing out on purpose. I'm not playing devils advocate for meetups, I just dont see the problem with well prepared meet ups, or organicaly agreed upon intimacy. If the best solution is "Fuck no. Disallowed." That's for the best. Maybe I will dip into that section and see formyself what the damage is lol...)

3. Dont advertise it. You should at minimum be forced/heavily advised to privately scrutinize the profile as you would for a meetup in general, and "flirt" in DMS... Is that decent start? It's up for debate!

If you are doing first meet sex, youre already overstepping the advice here for safety of yourself, and MOST importantly, your critters who rely on you! If you are otherwise an attentive family member/lover, why would you lack this critically? Aspire to change that, please...

5. Get tested. Yeah, zoonotic diseases are rare and STI transmission can be mitigated, but dont risk anything.
 
Last edited:
btdc69 said:
For example, groups exist on this website and I personally have never really engaged with them.
Click to expand...
There's so many groups where some is the same area or some use it like its a messaging service. Nearly 99% just people joining just to join with no engagement at all.
Knutshack said:
First timers have to start somewhere and the personals would be a good place for them, you can post around the forum and chat to others and see if an owner comes by and is willing to chat and meet but the personals is a better bet for them
Click to expand...
I was a first timer to. Surely many were. It was years before I even got to meet anyone. I think most of it is people are trying to find something quick, only to end up with a fake, or end up in something worse.

People should learn to have patience.

PupasaurWRECKS said:
I don't intend on meeting anyone for any reason. I don't want to ever risk losing my four legged family, just by there being a chance in the mind I was meeting up for "activities." It scares me very much.

That being said, I agree in the sense we do not know until it is too late whether those wirh ill intent are neglecting, exploiting or abusing their animals privately, with those ads for intimacy. It can be lessened by overhauling the rules. ZETA stands for something. :/

I have no problem with people responsibly sharing intimacy, so long as everything-that-should-be is considered, however, we just dont know what is going on after these posts are acted upon. And that is what should be first considered...

Before I am asked to elaborate, here are a few considerations when you have 1. known someone for awhile, 2. see your companion/lover take an interest.
(My brain is mush, please don't assume I am leaving somehing out on purpose. I'm not playing devils advocate for meetups, I just dont see the problem with well prepared meet ups, or organicaly agreed upon intimacy. If the best solution is "Fuck no. Disallowed." That's for the best. Maybe I will dip into that section and see formyself what the damage is lol...)

3. Dont advertise it. You should at minimum be forced/heavily advised to privately scrutinize the profile as you would for a meetup in general, and "flirt" in DMS... Is that decent start? It's up for debate!

If you are doing first meet sex, youre already overstepping the advice here for safety of yourself, and MOST importantly, your critters who rely on you! If you are otherwise an attentive family member/lover, why would you lack this critically? Aspire to change that, please...

5. Get tested. Yeah, zoonotic diseases are rare and STI transmission can be mitigated, but dont risk anything.
Click to expand...
Getting to know someone for awhile is for the best. Some word of mouth may not be so bad, if said person truly knows them and its not just to plan a fuck meet up. Many of my meets were just casual. Sex wasn't even a topic. May be some jokes here and there.
Even my girls had their own wanting to know you first before getting dicked.
Guess to the fetishist, I'm a boring one. Since I don't force my girl to take it no matter what.
 
dogluver101 said:
Gettting to know someone for awhile is for the best. Some word of mouth may not be so bad, if said person truly knows them and its not just to plan a fuck meet up. Many of my meets were just casual. Sex wasn't even a topic. May be some jokes here and there.
Even my girls had their own wanting to know you first before getting dicked.
Guess to the fetishist, I'm a boring one. Since I don't force my girl to take it no matter what.
Click to expand...
I hope to find more friends one day. I dont like hanging around nonzoos beside my relatives I guess.
 
CookieEnthusiasm said:
I wanna see if I'm not the only one. Are you tired of seeing in the personal ads for people seeking owners for first time experience or owners basically whoring out their animals?
I would love to see the space treated as a way for like minded zoos to meet others in their area and not for a reason to hookup.
Click to expand...
Sadly this forum, like most of the zoo chats on the Internet, is mostly bestialists, kinksters and wankers. That's one of the reasons the Zoocadia sister site was started. I just wish they'd put a personal ads section on there too.
 
pes said:
Why?
If you talk to someone you like on the forum, you can do the courtship ritual in PM in private.
You do not need to advertise how big of a cock you have in the public.
Click to expand...
The problem arises when one is looking for people in one's area to have a walk or drink some tea together. That's difficult without some kind of public geographic filtering in advance. Unfortunately, most interesting people tend to live too far away.

Fortunately, most people I wouldn't want to meet live far away as well. ;)
 
pes said:
Why?
If you talk to someone you like on the forum, you can do the courtship ritual in PM in private.
You do not need to advertise how big of a cock you have in the public.
Click to expand...
😂 Well it's easier to know if someone is even interested in being contacted for such a thing (relationship not dickpics) in the first place if they have a personals ad up. It's also easier and simpler to pm someone a link to a post rather than a bunch of back and forth intro only to find out they're married. Personals can have more pertinent details (are they available, are they a kinkster or real zoo, are they interested in humans and to what degree, etc) that otherwise would take much longer to find sifting through their entire post history prior to deciding whether or not you want to even bother contacting them in the first place. Also instead of typing everything out you can just send them the link to the post.

Sure, most straight guys in places like this looking for a zoolady will settle for anything because they don't want a relationship they want disposable kinky sex fantasy fulfillment. But folks like me who care about compatibility, love and long term relationship need a little more than that and anyone seeking a human partner can go to that section and browse, knowing everyone on that section is looking too. That's one of the ways that personal ads make mate-seeking easier.
 
i mean, if people want to try and hookup, let them, most owners dont even respond or look. HOWEVER consider the alternative, for someone wanting to dip their toes in the water, what are their options? asking randoms on dating apps? fence hopping? as much as you may dislike the personals, feels like the lesser of evils.
 
Nah. It's unfortunate that most posts are of that nature, but I don't believe that would help.

Something I think would be a good idea, however, would be restricting the personals section to people with PM permissions. I don't see the point of allowing those accounts access when they have no way to actually communicate privately without sharing their telegram username publicly - it's just baiting people into breaking the rules and encouraging brand new accounts to go begging for their kinky zoo fantasy without first actually making a contribution to the community. I think changing this would make a meaningful improvement to the quality of the threads and responses in the personals sections.
 
CookieEnthusiasm said:
I wanna see if I'm not the only one. Are you tired of seeing in the personal ads for people seeking owners for first time experience or owners basically whoring out their animals?
I would love to see the space treated as a way for like minded zoos to meet others in their area and not for a reason to hookup.
Click to expand...
Not having people "whore out their animals" I can understand. But everyone is a first-timer at some point looking for ways to have their first experience. How else are they going to have those first experiences if not by finding people who'd be willing to help them with that?
 
Soije678 said:
Not having people "whore out their animals" I can understand. But everyone is a first-timer at some point looking for ways to have their first experience. How else are they going to have those first experiences if not by finding people who'd be willing to help them with that?
Click to expand...
I mean... by getting your own animal? Not saying I disagree with your sentiment but that's a pretty obvious answer, lol
 
Soije678 said:
But everyone is a first-timer at some point looking for ways to have their first experience. How else are they going to have those first experiences if not by finding people who'd be willing to help them with that?
Click to expand...
By becoming owners and taking responsibility for and loving an animal. If all they want is to feel and animal dick then they can get a dildo.
 
Soije678 said:
Not having people "whore out their animals" I can understand. But everyone is a first-timer at some point looking for ways to have their first experience. How else are they going to have those first experiences if not by finding people who'd be willing to help them with that?
Click to expand...
This is a message that I see from everyone trying to give as an excuse to why them feel it's ok. If you truly want to experience it for yourself, then adopt your own. Not that I would recommend it for you considering if sex is the only thing on your mind with animals.
 
Now I'm going to express an unpopular opinion, from a neutral point of view.
I agree that beggars are assholes. But why only men?
I find it strange that almost everyone agrees that men who look online for owners of dogs for sex are assholes (I agree on it), but at the same time women who look online for dogs for sex are viewed with approval and admiration. Isn't that a double standard?
What do you think?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top