knotboy6969
Tourist
Simple things first .
It would be nice to be notified your under review, if your going to remove commenting options . For example the edit function . I understand why, but the fact that it just disappears and there’s no mention of anything.
Would be nice to say “account is under review, certain permissions may be disabled at this time “
vs finding out other ways that I’m being secretly spied on ….
Next thing . Insta bans with no way to defend themselves.
Can’t you just lock the account for a bit so the person can at least chat with staff to discuss the issue ?
The main issue I have around this topic is when people are banned due to responding to a topic .
when a person responds to a topic and there is a screen shot of a video posted as reference by the op. They respond with a clip or video of that video then end up banned .
Why? They did not post the original, as far as they know that was within the rules , given the fact it was still up and visible.
Is it expected that every person go thru the banned vid list before they post any pic or video whatsoever? ( especially if it’s not even listed there until after banned)
How can someone be punished to that extent simple by responding to what is presumably a legitimate post.
But then given no option to explain even discuss it.
The original poster I can see harsher punishment, but as stated if a thread is active, most would assume it’s fine .
If that is not the case then maybe some sort of thread starting moderation needs to go in an effect .
Where the first post is either allowed or not .
Because as of rn if i see an active thread, im under the assumption that they are legal threads .
I’m just saying I feel it’s unfair for people to get banned for a reply to a post, if the first post has the original content.
At least give it an audit time . Especially for members of several years without issues
It would be nice to be notified your under review, if your going to remove commenting options . For example the edit function . I understand why, but the fact that it just disappears and there’s no mention of anything.
Would be nice to say “account is under review, certain permissions may be disabled at this time “
vs finding out other ways that I’m being secretly spied on ….
Next thing . Insta bans with no way to defend themselves.
Can’t you just lock the account for a bit so the person can at least chat with staff to discuss the issue ?
The main issue I have around this topic is when people are banned due to responding to a topic .
when a person responds to a topic and there is a screen shot of a video posted as reference by the op. They respond with a clip or video of that video then end up banned .
Why? They did not post the original, as far as they know that was within the rules , given the fact it was still up and visible.
Is it expected that every person go thru the banned vid list before they post any pic or video whatsoever? ( especially if it’s not even listed there until after banned)
How can someone be punished to that extent simple by responding to what is presumably a legitimate post.
But then given no option to explain even discuss it.
The original poster I can see harsher punishment, but as stated if a thread is active, most would assume it’s fine .
If that is not the case then maybe some sort of thread starting moderation needs to go in an effect .
Where the first post is either allowed or not .
Because as of rn if i see an active thread, im under the assumption that they are legal threads .
I’m just saying I feel it’s unfair for people to get banned for a reply to a post, if the first post has the original content.
At least give it an audit time . Especially for members of several years without issues