Tit for tat I agree! However……I haven’t ever been offended by a pussy pic yet! ?I think it is unlikely. Also you would have to apply that to vag pics as well.
I do not want to see someone's fleshy bits that look like the ham I buy in the local shop either.
View attachment 465143
Wow I feel attacked. I blurred out my tiny dick. anything else you disapprove of about my nude body?
Nah, I am okay, ?
Or get carried off through the forest by a horde of them like in "jungle burger"???
I agree as I don't have much of an exhibit complex lol
I’m glad. But I also suggest you pick something for an avatar. The letter B is not memorable. But hey ok if you don’t your choice.
I had another picture before but it was probably a little too revealing, it was a protogen version of my fursona so... Yeah
That's probably a wise decision. Usually it's not wise to mix zoophilia with with furrism due to the passionate anti-zoo sentiment that exists among many furries. Especially with the younger generation of furries. Hopefully you'll find yourself a nice replacement avatar for the one that you had previously. Perhaps you could even create yourself a unique "zoo-sona" character separate from your normal fursona.
I’m not disgusted , just I come to a zoo site to live in my experience as a zoo, if I wanted to embellish my sexuality with humans I will go to appropriate sites for that. Now human and zoo together stuff is A—OK of course.
I was referring more to the original poster who seemed to be unable to refer to a human penis without some form of strange euphemistic insult.
My DMs are open for the uncensored version of your profile pic, if you feel like sharing. ?
That’s because Apple doesn’t allow listings of any app that has publicly available NSFW content which means that if Grindr allowed public nudes they’d lose half their membership from being unavailable on iOS devices.
Thank you for your reply, its true that I was going to put myself in danger, and honestly I'm kinda glad to have changed it, and I think I'm gonna stick with the "B" for now xP
This is a good argument. Though at the same time, one could have a profile picture of Superman, so why distinguish between the two?
I have to explain what the difference is ? I mean the same reason you don’t see human genital images plastered all over in public, and why in nearly all places it is illegal to expose yourself in public. Human genital images evoke a sexual response or in some cases aversion in a majority of the population. If I was looking for cock or vag pics to give myself an arousal response I’d go look for them on purpose. Like visit a thread for them . Same goes for what I don’t want to see as cocks are not something I don't want to look at least most of the time unless they are involved in activities that attract me. So again on a zoo site I would expect zoo themed sexual pfps, not straight up human only genitalia. Of course non sexual or disgusting pfps of Superman are fine , I mean that’s a given.
So do I
