Banned Websites

I would think the last thing youd worry about is the Users being lied to. It's part and parcel of the entire movie industry. You see, as I have said a million times....just this week....what the producer wants you to see. Whether its here, Hollywood, Bollywood or Mars, that will remain true. If the idiots cannot take care of themselves, its their problem.
 
search quest for "zoophilia" be like after browsing some results:

1) snake/alligator sex - hmph
2) eel insertions - hmph^2
3) sex with chickens and geese - wtf
4) snail insertions/maggots - wtf^2
5) vore - wtf^3

thats a weird concept of zoophilia
 
I have visited most of these banned sites for years, never seen any CP there. Never been aware it existed there either, specially the sites that even have zoo or beast in the name. I thought they was only containing animals. It would be great to know what sites are safe to visit, if any?
The videos here are fine but it’s quite few compared to the tubes.
Ztube org are also on the bad side?

What about sites like artofzoo? It costs money tho.

Would be nice having something safe to go to, even if costing money.
 
I have visited most of these banned sites for years, never seen any CP there. Never been aware it existed there either, specially the sites that even have zoo or beast in the name. I thought they was only containing animals. It would be great to know what sites are safe to visit, if any?
The videos here are fine but it’s quite few compared to the tubes.
Ztube org are also on the bad side?

What about sites like artofzoo? It costs money tho.

Would be nice having something safe to go to, even if costing money.
That would be us supporting Art of Zoo. We don't allow commercial content, so anything from them isn't allowed. Even Seamless-Flow
We only will list the bad ones. Plus nearly 99% of all of them (Even not mentioned) are filled with pop ups, adware, etc. Then we'll be looked at like we're supporting all of that.
 
That would be us supporting Art of Zoo. We don't allow commercial content, so anything from them isn't allowed. Even Seamless-Flow
We only will list the bad ones. Plus nearly 99% of all of them (Even not mentioned) are filled with pop ups, adware, etc. Then we'll be looked at like we're supporting all of that.
Oh I see. I understand. It’s just so hard finding something that feels somehow safe to visit. It seems all of them are full of pop ups and adware.

I guess it’s allowed for anyone to PM me tips of good and safe sites?
If so, I would be grateful for any tip of a safe site.
 
Oh I see. I understand. It’s just so hard finding something that feels somehow safe to visit. It seems all of them are full of pop ups and adware.

I guess it’s allowed for anyone to PM me tips of good and safe sites?
If so, I would be grateful for any tip of a safe site.
Well, here is pretty decent, I'd say some of the better amateur stuff is here, especially since abusive garbage gets tossed, often rather quick.
 
Well, here is pretty decent, I'd say some of the better amateur stuff is here, especially since abusive garbage gets tossed, often rather quick.
It is too inconvenient though. It is not quick fast porn.
And to be honest I get that, I also like to have quick access to yiff when jerking off and I prefer e621 before threads on here.
Unfortunately the forum does not offer a gallery like access to content.
 
It is too inconvenient though. It is not quick fast porn.
And to be honest I get that, I also like to have quick access to yiff when jerking off and I prefer e621 before threads on here.
Unfortunately the forum does not offer a gallery like access to content.

That's entirely fair. It would be nice if we could implement an RTMP server that also supports still galleries to run the porn content under ZV moderation and rules, but the effort is great, as is the cost.
 
Can we have an allowed list too or do we already have one?
There are hundreds of crap porn sites. It is unrealistic to be able to list them all. As long as the site is not on the forbidden list, it is allowed.
 
There are hundreds of crap porn sites. It is unrealistic to be able to list them all. As long as the site is not on the forbidden list, it is allowed.
Maybe a small list of good, approved sites would be more beneficial and a blanket ban on the hundreds of crap sites would be easier to maintain??
 
Why's ******** still not on the list?
I do not know. Which things does it violate?
It is going to be everywhere. Every single zoo porn video site I have seen so far had a hit for at least one of these:
Chicken fucking.
Fish fucking.
Eel insertion.
Bound horses.
Fake cum.
AAA porn.
You can not fight this issue with education because that would need people to care, which they mostly do not.
You can not ban them all since one goes down and 2 with the same content go up.
The attempt to make the world's first video site that actively bans people for posting animal abuse is not likely going to be successful.
 
Maybe a small list of good, approved sites would be more beneficial and a blanket ban on the hundreds of crap sites would be easier to maintain??
Those sites upload the same videos, so I suspect the list would be near cero...

I mean, even here, being quite effectvely cleaned, you may find the occasional wrong video before it gets reported. Whiever saw it, would remove it ftom the list
 
Personally I find it fascinating that zoo porn video sites often ban tor IPs or refuse to work properly.
What a beautiful idea for the safety of your visitors watching sometimes illegal porn depending on where you live.
On the other hand if any of those sites ever causes problems for their visitors, the people visiting them form a nice thick shield before any zoophiles are affected. :D
 
Personally I find it fascinating that zoo porn video sites often ban tor IPs or refuse to work properly.
What a beautiful idea for the safety of your visitors watching sometimes illegal porn depending on where you live.
On the other hand if any of those sites ever causes problems for their visitors, the people visiting them form a nice thick shield before any zoophiles are affected. :D
TRUST ME your not missing anything. Any assumptions things can make outside the forum are true.

Because outside the forum the bare minimum is "female degradation by animals" to well... Small animal stuff. (Putting it lightly).

(Imo humankind are sadists naturally. Considering the fact something so straightforward isnt acknowledged such as animal welfare. They prefer making money and shortcuts. If this wasn't true they would have equality sure enough) This is all my opinion LoL
 
But who cares if people use certain food products for help, dildoing, fish, and other ways. We want to see freaky shit.
I would agree fucking food does not hurt animals but news is this is "zooville" so we are i terested in animals, not in supermarket groceries.

For the record, I searched "chicken" and I got videos of someone fucking a clean de-feathered grocery chicken (wonder if that is necro?? :D ) and also a video of a truched allegidly eating fried chicken (damn hot wings are hot as fuck?? lol)

btw.
WE do not want to see freaky shit, thanks. Not US, maybe you do.
And there IS freky shit like worms in cock, mouse vore and a few more niceties
 
Might as well ban ALL websites then, if you look through any beast site you can find something that the admin here labels as abuse. Including videos posted here by members. But I think the goal is to ban any website that doesn't have control over content to the point they dont do anything about abuse or CP. 4Chan deals with CP and Bestiality constantly, but the admins there clean that up instantly (just like here).
 
Only reason I actually watch any of the videos in the porn section is to make sure it's not abusive or violating our rules here anyways
 
If the USA is so uptight about beastiality. Why do they allow all these sites to be up and running.
A) The US doesn't control the internet.
B) Those sites aren't hosted in the US.
C) No one "allows" a website to exist. All one has to do to create a website is put it on a computer that's connected to the internet and attach a domain to that computer's IP. Unless that computer and the data on it is physically seized no authority can "shut down" a website because all the person with that computer has to do is change the IP the domain they set up is targeting. There's no global police force busting down doors to seize every computer that contains data that's "not allowed online".
 
A) The US doesn't control the internet.
B) Those sites aren't hosted in the US.
C) No one "allows" a website to exist. All one has to do to create a website is put it on a computer that's connected to the internet and attach a domain to that computer's IP. Unless that computer and the data on it is physically seized no authority can "shut down" a website because all the person with that computer has to do is change the IP the domain they set up is targeting. There's no global police force busting down doors to seize every computer that contains data that's "not allowed online".
You forgot
D) It's bestiality, not beastiality, idiot
 
You guys defending the "freaky shit" are the reason zoophiles will never be accepted.
What "freaky shit" are you claiming we're defending? Didn't know not allowing something was defending. But I guess words can mean anything these days regardless what the official meaning is.
 
What "freaky shit" are you claiming we're defending? Didn't know not allowing something was defending. But I guess words can mean anything these days regardless what the official meaning is.
I thought he was talking about the people who defended sites that you guys banned, but I could be wrong.
 
Back
Top