Why do women seem to be more open to the idea of Bestiality

An awfullot of men who are 'into zoophilia'' aren't zoophiles at all. They're psychos who like sick shit. They want the grossest zoo/pedo/scat porn they can find and they like it because it's disgusting and gross(to them ). For that reason they prefer rape and not by any stretch consensual.

Women are pretty much never into that because most of 'em already been victimized by men like that. So girl zoos are actually zoos and not just zoo-themed sickos. They overwhelmingly prefer dogs because they're more practically accessible and they're worried a horse would eviscerate them like Mr Hands.
 
MacRumble said:
An awfullot of men who are 'into zoophilia'' aren't zoophiles at all. They're psychos who like sick shit. They want the grossest zoo/pedo/scat porn they can find and they like it because it's disgusting and gross(to them ). For that reason they prefer rape and not by any stretch consensual.

Women are pretty much never into that because most of 'em already been victimized by men like that. So girl zoos are actually zoos and not just zoo-themed sickos. They overwhelmingly prefer dogs because they're more practically accessible and they're worried a horse would eviscerate them like Mr Hands.
Click to expand...
I think in the aggregate I agree with you, but I've seen a video of a female zoo that was a sicko.

There's one camgirl who straight-up admitted that the porn she's into is dudes raping female animals in a clearly violent manner.
 
MacRumble said:
An awfullot of men who are 'into zoophilia'' aren't zoophiles at all. They're psychos who like sick shit. They want the grossest zoo/pedo/scat porn they can find and they like it because it's disgusting and gross(to them ). For that reason they prefer rape and not by any stretch consensual.

Women are pretty much never into that because most of 'em already been victimized by men like that. So girl zoos are actually zoos and not just zoo-themed sickos. They overwhelmingly prefer dogs because they're more practically accessible and they're worried a horse would eviscerate them like Mr Hands.
Click to expand...
Where did you get that fucking stupid notion?
 
MacRumble said:
An awfullot of men who are 'into zoophilia'' aren't zoophiles at all. They're psychos who like sick shit. They want the grossest zoo/pedo/scat porn they can find and they like it because it's disgusting and gross(to them ). For that reason they prefer rape and not by any stretch consensual.

Women are pretty much never into that because most of 'em already been victimized by men like that. So girl zoos are actually zoos and not just zoo-themed sickos. They overwhelmingly prefer dogs because they're more practically accessible and they're worried a horse would eviscerate them like Mr Hands.
Click to expand...
Not sure how much mental gymnastics this took but not very true. Woman can be just as much into the sick stuff as men
 
Though "sick stuff" is very vague and you really are generalizing. Everyone has limits and where those limits are differs for everyone.
I actually prefer the notion of dogs as sex toys more because I feel if you go into zoophilia you are projecting human emotions and responses that just aren't there because dogs aren't humans. I see having a dog help you with sex in the same way as a dog helping you with other stuff like finding burried things or even being a pair of eyes.

I think think the ones who prefer dogs to humans are the dangerous ones. Dogs can serve as an addition to a human relationship but they can not serve as a substitute. Humans need human contact and avoiding human contact for other things is when fetishes start to get dangerous.
 
Marinus18 said:
I think think the ones who prefer dogs to humans are the dangerous ones. Dogs can serve as an addition to a human relationship but they can not serve as a substitute. Humans need human contact and avoiding human contact for other things is when fetishes start to get dangerous.
Click to expand...
guess that's an understandable opinion if you somehow see prefering dogs to humans relationship-wise as "avoiding human contact". you do realize you can have perfectly functional social life without wanting to fuck any of your human friends, right? well, almost perfectly functional as i can't really attend any double dates.

also, i have no idea how you got to the "substitute" part. from a zoo-exclusive point of view at least. substitute implies it's like "the next best thing" for me and similar ppl when in fact it's not. it's the only thing. is there any projecting at play? it would be naive to claim there isn't. i never had any sexual/love interest in humans. i have friends i frequently socialize with, i'm simply not interested in fucking (or marrying for that matter) any of them.
 
BishiBashiSpecial said:
Not sure how much mental gymnastics this took but not very true. Woman can be just as much into the sick stuff as men
Click to expand...
I totally agree, Bishi. I like a lot of porn that many, many people would consider extreme to the point of being ‘sick’. What can I say… it turns me on. Loads of guys get aroused by ‘sick’ porn too - but many… possibly most… never do in real life anything remotely as extreme as what they enjoy watching. Chicks are like that, too (some… not all). Three g/fs and I enjoy watching quite outrageous stuff… and often DO watch it before having a 4-some. It sure gets the juices flowing! 😉
 
Dankdunkdrunk2 said:
So i have been into watching women get fucked by animals for a long time. But still at this point if someone offered me some animal pussy i would be like "nah, i'm good". And i have the feeling a lot of men that are into zoo girls or even have active wives/girlfriends would have the same reaction.

Looking around at forums/communities there seem to be a lot of people that have been able to get multiple girlfriends/wives from outside the zoosphere into bestiality. And looking at the Animal porn industry, a reasonable amount of women are down to perform in one of the most, if not the most depraved act of sexuality getting paid mere peanuts.

So my question is: Why do women seem to be so much more open to the idea of bestiality?

I mean, i have some idea's, but i'm really wondering what people here think about this.





And this is something that has wracked my mind for quite some years. Why are seamingly "normal"
Click to expand...
alot of people are in for what exictes them, and i think the difference with women is that they can exprience more sexual pleasure because they dont have the losing horniness issue guys have after ejcauliting so you can see women expriencing in things that are unique like having sex with multiple partners like 8, 10, 100 and etc
 
I've struggled with the reflection of what other posters have said about only being into the kink side of it but when I look into my own experiences (mainly licking my cock) I can safely reassure myself.

While the porn aspect is definitely one part, the reason that porn is usually so enticing is because it's a lifestyle I want to share and partake in, and love seeing my partner happy. Usually when girls are videod with their dogs it's an extremely intimate/romantic endeavor to me to see and having the chance to enable and/or integrate into that exchange and feel that joy with someone is why I like it.

I think like with normal relationships you can be into it to varying degrees and/or for different reasons. I love thinking back to my dog going to town licking my dick, but at the same time I also don't necessarily want to fuck a female dog. I do however also see zoo as a lifestyle beyond more than just sex. I'm also into animal dildos/sleeves for myself as well.

Often times like with bdsm and petplay I often refer to an "exchange of energies" when it comes to any kind of kink or sexual activity or community. The kind of energy exchange with zoo is a different beast (pun intended) altogether.

I don't think it's more prevalent with women though. I think if anything 9 times out of 10 a woman will never reveal or talk about this with anyone. As much as I'd love for that to be different my gender hasn't exactly facilitated the greatest amount of trust for that. Combine that with the prosecution they would face if they were caught by the wrong people and it breeds a taboo environment that can attract a lot of people there to exploit their love rather than want to share in it.

Sorry for rambling I just saw some other posts and had a lot to say about it.
 
You have to be careful to differentiate between a relative increase and an absolute increase. A significant relative increase from a small base still means that a practice is uncommon. If for example 1% of women are zoos and there is a 50% increase then there is still only 1.5% of women who are zoos. That remains an insignificant number when compared to the whole population of women. It's not until a significant number of women become zoos (probably will never happen) that a relative increase can have, emphasis on can, a significant effect on the absolute scale.

Are more women zoos now than there were twenty-five years ago? Yeah probably because of the ready access to zoo content of all types and other types of porn on the internet which was practically unavailable before especially for zoo porn. That still doesn't mean that a significant percentage of women are into it though.
 
PatC said:
I'm not sure we're more into it than men. It might seem like it because there are more videos and written material about women and dogs. I think it's a case of more people wanting to see us getting fucked by animals. That's just my thought on it, I have no actual data to support it.
Click to expand...
i think the general population of this forum and the amount of "how to make my wife fuck a dog for me" threads compared to "how to make my husband fuck a dog for me" is plenty of data.
 
PatC said:
I'm not sure we're more into it than men. It might seem like it because there are more videos and written material about women and dogs. I think it's a case of more people wanting to see us getting fucked by animals. That's just my thought on it, I have no actual data to support it.
Click to expand...
^This, the porn industry is always going to cater to the largest demographic.

...also, I expect they gay crowd are equally receptive but they aren't on your radar due to your own sexual preferences and straight men who fuck female dogs are probably more secretive than the rest of us.
 
Thats easy, its a sex act. Not all men are and Id bet you those guys who arent into at least viewing it or curiosity have low interest in sex. People with a high to very high sex drive are MUCH more proned to be into a kink or many kinks.

If you are horny a lot you mind wanders into all kinds of fantasies to satisfy your hunger. I think single women into this may not be interested in relationships and or enjoy the control of when and how, hence single women here DO NOT want a single man's attention, thats well documented all over this site. Couples maybe use it to spice things up, I know it w9uld be my reason in a relationship.
 
kinkysara said:
I can't speak for anyone but myself, but I agree that the being taken, as you put it is the appeal that mostly draws me to my lifestyle choices, the adrenaline rush and that mixture of excitement ,guilt and fear combined with that feeling I get from being totaly submissive with my chosen partner be it human or dog.
I wouldn't say i want to be raped but definetly turned on by being dominated and challenged.
Click to expand...
The main thing I've realized that turns me on about it, is no matter who your chosen zoo partner is, they won't listen to owww stop, or oh easy boy, or even AHHHHHHHH! That turns me on tremendously, if a human partner did that I would just be angry and 100% turned off instantly. That lack of control because of raw animal instinct to breed outweighing everything else, makes its so hot imo. Seeing videos of the bottoms trying to move away to ease the mindless, unchecked, furious pounding, only to be followed instantly by their dominator is the hottest thing ever. Again if a human partner did that (unless concented to) imo they are a shitty person. So for me at least it's def, that raw, animal instinct taking over everything else that melts me. But since you enjoy it from either partner its most likely a subconscious hierarchy thing, which BTW is most often found in more powerful people with men, and less powerful with women. It's also seen in some weaker men, but that often requires a very high amount of abuse, degradation, or made to feel less than others for any or every reason, from a very young age, but it usually needs to be very deep seeded to become a kink. Most of the time, with weaker men its either a huge fear, or its been beaten into them to the point it's seen as normal to them. But like everything with people its not black and white its an uneven rainbow, with certain "colors" making up more of the rainbow than others. Some of that is textbook psychology, and some is things gained directly from the people I've talked to about this subject, both into it, appalled by it, and some in the middle areas.

BTW if you disagree, please post it here, don't flood my dms or my wall to argue about it, I'll probably just block you.
 
PatC said:
I'm not sure we're more into it than men. It might seem like it because there are more videos and written material about women and dogs. I think it's a case of more people wanting to see us getting fucked by animals. That's just my thought on it, I have no actual data to support it.
Click to expand...
Your 100% right on it being more desired, but it's also because it's much easier to facilitate for women as non owners. It is much harder for non pet owning men to find owners who are willing to share their loved ones with other guys, 1. because they aren't turned on by it, and 2 women are seen as much less of a threat, and perceived as much more gentle and passive by a large % of men. Think of it this way, men are much more wary or even scared of other men that they don't know. Most men, especially in sexual situations, have little to no fear of women they don't know, and are much more willing to "roll the dice" if you will that unknown women are much less likely to be dangerous or have bad intentions than men as a group. It's also thought most of the women who do have bad intentions, it's to take money or give them an std, ect, with men its mainly violent intentions. Which is usually 100% correct. Another factor is that those type of people are more often found with above average intelligence people, so men know they need to be more careful and secretive and the women know that most guys think their harmless or their bad intending aren't as bad as their male counterparts. That's not just because of the numbers being uneven but also because that type of behavior is much more alarming in men than in women. Those feeling about women are also much more likely, to be written off, while when seen in men its a trait that is more likely to stick and be either investigated, or accepted as fact with no evidence. This is because of the perceived level of danger men present compared to women. If you disagree, just ask yourself this, if a strange man, or a strange woman, knocked on your car window in a deserted parking lot at night, and your window didn't work, how different would your reaction be? How much more likely would you be to open your door to interact in each scenario? Go 1 step further and now it's a scared or panicked man or women, how likely are you to open your door in those 2 scenarios?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top